Flashback: In August 2010, President Midas Touch Scrapped Tougher Bush-Era Quarantine Rules Designed to Halt Spread of Epidemics
First, a little background on Bush's thinking in 2005 when he proposed the rules.
Bush Weighs Strategies to Counter Possible Outbreak of Bird Flu
WASHINGTON, Oct. 4 - President Bush said today that he was working to prepare the United States for a possibly deadly outbreak of avian flu. He said he had weighed whether to quarantine parts of the country and also whether to employ the military for the difficult task of enforcing such a quarantine.
"I am concerned about what an avian flu outbreak could mean for the United States and the world," he said at a White House news conference.
The president emphasized that he was not predicting such an outbreak. "I'm just suggesting to you that we better be thinking about it," he told reporters, "and we are. And we're more than thinking about it, we're trying to put plans in place."
Since 2003, the avian flu has killed about 65 people in Southeast Asia who had been in contact with infected fowl. So far the virus has not mutated into a strain capable of transmission from one human to another.
If it does, scientists say that it could kill millions of people worldwide, reminiscent of the 1918-19 Spanish-flu pandemic, which claimed more lives than World War I. Because the virus is new, humans have little or no defense against it. It kills about half of those infected, and an outbreak could spread around the world in days.
Now watch this drive:
More than 30 Democratic senators, including Mr. Obama, sent Mr. Bush a letter today asking him to release the administration's final plan for dealing with a pandemic influenza. The group expressed its "grave concern that the nation is dangerously unprepared."
So Democrats and Obama were forward-leaning on outbreak control when Bush was president.
Gee I feel like I've seen this movie a few times before.
Flash forward to April 2010, after Obama became president, and reviewed the 2005 rules. He "quietly" dumped them.
The Obama administration has quietly scrapped plans to enact sweeping new federal quarantine regulations that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention touted four years ago as critical to protecting Americans from dangerous diseases spread by travelers.
The regulations, proposed in 2005 during the Bush administration amid fears of avian flu, would have given the federal government additional powers to detain sick airline passengers and those exposed to certain diseases. They also would have expanded requirements for airlines to report ill passengers to the CDC and mandated that airlines collect and maintain contact information for fliers in case they later needed to be traced as part of an investigation into an outbreak.
Airline and civil liberties groups, which had opposed the rules, praised their withdrawal.
Incidentally, Obama has a history of rebuffing calls to close borders in response to a public health threat:
Thus far, the Obama administration has gotten high marks from quarantine critics, particularly for rejecting suggestions that the U.S. close its border with Mexico during the initial swine flu outbreak. "The current administration quite rightfully resisted those calls," Jennifer Nuzzo of the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Biosecurity said.
Health Officials Now Monitoring 100 Ebola Contacts, Up From "12-18"
The good news is that they say they are tracking this man "out of an abundance of caution." This is one of this PR-obsessed Administration's favorite phrases, but it may be justified here. They say the list of 100 includes people who had limited contact with Duncan (or with one of the kids Duncan may have infected). They are not high threats for infection.
Contrast that with four people who had close contact with Duncan now being ordered to stay at home.
I don't know who those four are, but anyone who was in the apartment Duncan was staying at, or in the ambulance that brought him to the hospital, are at much higher risk. Per Reuters:
Two days after he was sent home from a Dallas hospital, the man who is the first person to be diagnosed with Ebola in the United States was seen vomiting on the ground outside an apartment complex as he was bundled into an ambulance. …
"His whole family was screaming. He got outside and he was throwing up all over the place," resident Mesud Osmanovic, 21, said on Wednesday, describing the chaotic scene...
Apparently Duncan had direct physical contact with an ebola patient shortly before he got on that plane. He was helping to move a pregnant woman infected with the disease.
I know a lot of people are going to say "We should criminalize that, the failure to inform about contact with an infectious person when applying for a Visa."
The trouble is this works into the deadly gameplan of the virus, which is to turn humans into its willing coconspirators. If you threaten punishments for lying, people will just conceal their symptoms more, and thereby remain free to infect more people.
The threat of a punishment is counter-productive (and may actually work in ebola's favor).
This Administration has to admit that its screening at airports is just taking someone's temperature and is almost entirely useless.
Remember Security Theater at the TSA? Well this is just Public Health Theater, and it's not even a lot of theater besides.
But Obama won't do that until there's an enormous crisis which starts making itself be felt in polling.
80 People Came Into Contact With Texas Ebola Patient
Well, this doesn't sound good.
About 80 people came into contact with U.S. Ebola patient Thomas Eric Duncan or one of his family members before he was hospitalized, Dallas County health officials said Thursday.
However, not all of them were necessarily in close physical contact with the Liberian national, Dallas County's Health and Human Services director Zachary Thompson said. That number is in addition to the 12 to 18 people who had direct contact with Duncan, including some school-age children, Texas Gov. Rick Perry said Wednesday
I think the important thing here is to remind everyone to stay calm. Don't panic. Don't run to the store right now and buy supplies. Wait until later, after I've had my chance to buy up all the supplies. Don't worry, I will sell some to you at a 2,000% mark up.
Thursday Morning Open Thread
Sorry guys, work got in the way.
Where most people named Ronny live in Germany.
...aaaaaand that changes the ENTIRE conversation... (tmi3rd)
Hi there, Morons and Moronettes.
As many of you are undoubtedly aware, we've had some advancements in the Ebola storyline, and it changes the perspective of the entire story.
Last night's post was based on the understanding that our dear patient in Dallas didn't know he was infected, and happened to get exposed as he was making a planned trip to visit family in the United States. That would indicate that it would be a comparatively isolated incident (around twenty people exposed and will be monitored).
That no longer appears to be the case.
More below the fold. I apologize in advance for the length of this, but there's a lot to talk about...
Okay, so here's what we know as of this evening...
Our patient's name appears to be Thomas Eric Duncan of Liberia. Check out Bryan Preston's brief rundown of the NY Times article.
He came into direct contact with a friend who had Ebola. He rode with her in a taxi and carried her from the taxi to a hospital on September 15, four days before he flew to the United States. She was turned away from the hospital because the Ebola ward was full.
She died of Ebola early the following morning. Her brother also got sick and shows Ebola symptoms. That was at the same time that Duncan started getting sick. He left Liberia and arrived in Texas on September 20. Six days later he sought treatment at Texas Presbyterian Hospital, and was sent home. He returned two days later, and has been confirmed to be infected with Ebola.
Duncan also abruptly quit his job on September 4, so he might have already planned the trip to see his family in the U.S.
But he certainly knew that he had been exposed to Ebola by the time he boarded that plane and came to Texas, four days after his friend died of it. He must surely have known it when he first visited the Texas Presbyterian Hospital, and he must have known it when the doctors sent him home.
Editorial note: it has NOT been established that he was feeling sick prior to getting on the plane, despite the above blockquote.
Let that sink in, though: he knew he'd been exposed, and it's not unfair to deduce that he thought to himself, "the Americans will save me".
We'll get back to that in a moment, as there's more fun. Via Reuters:
Two days after he was sent home from a Dallas hospital, the man who is the first person to be diagnosed with Ebola in the United States was seen vomiting on the ground outside an apartment complex as he was bundled into an ambulance.
"His whole family was screaming. He got outside and he was throwing up all over the place," resident Mesud Osmanovic, 21, said on Wednesday, describing the chaotic scene before the man was admitted to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital on Sunday where he is in serious condition.
Now, that's not good, obviously, because you have to assume that the ground around the apartment- as well as probably the building's ventilation system- are contaminated. The good news is that bleach and Lysol can handle contaminated surfaces, and there are good professional decontamination groups who can handle those ventilation systems.
Still, that means he was (obviously) pretty sick when EMS picked him up, and that ambulance stayed in service. Now, having worked in the D/FW area, I've never known an EMS crew in the neighborhood that didn't aggressively decontaminate their ambulances daily. Certainly, one takes no chances, but the ambulance was decontaminated per CDC guidelines, and will be back in service again shortly. I don't have a problem with that.
The above link also notes that five school-age children came into contact with Duncan. That would be a nightmare scenario if the kids were already sick, but again, the bug doesn't spread until you're symptomatic. The indications are that as many as 18 people may have come into contact with Duncan while symptomatic, and they'll be monitored and kept at home for three weeks while we wait and see if they get sick.
Now, there was a mishandling of Duncan when he was initially assessed at the emergency room (this was prior to him getting his ambulance ride). He indicated to one of the staff that he was in from Liberia, but that was not communicated to the rest of the crew working on him.
I'm not going to speculate on how that happened- it's obviously a critical mistake, and it cost everyone a couple of days where they could have been getting on top of the disease. I will guarantee you that NOBODY in the business will repeat that mistake, and everyone will cross-check with each other to make sure that everyone is in the loop. Nobody in the business wants to contract a fatal disease working in the emergency room.
So, with those facts out there, let's get back to our dear Mr. Duncan, who not only jeopardized an entire continent, but set things up for an even uglier scenario down the road.
IF he survives- and he's still in pretty bad shape- then it's not much of a leap of logic to figure a lot of sick and potentially sick people will make the decision that it's worth the effort to get over to North America.
British Airways and Air France have already decided not to fly into the affected areas of west Africa, and there have been reasonable suggestions made to not admit travelers with passports from the affected areas to the United States. I actually agree with that assessment, but there's a reason it will fail mightily, and could make matters a lot worse.
Let's say the US puts a travel ban in place from western African nations. A determined person might then travel to Canada or Mexico and take their chances crossing the border there... it's a quick jump from Montreal, Vancouver, Toronto, and Winnipeg across the border into the US.
The Canadians, in my estimation, would be able to handle some of the influx, but I have no matching faith in our Mexican counterparts. Particularly along the southern border, the notion of thousands of new Ebola patients deciding to come visit fills me with no shortage of dread.
My point is that a travel ban to the US would only work if the rest of North and Central America follow suit. I don't know if that can be made to happen, and I also don't know if the folks in charge are willing to undertake something that might be construed as racially motivated.
Suffice it to say, I'm very concerned by this and angry beyond words at Mr. Duncan. What he has done endangers every last one of us, and if we as a nation can't figure out a way to keep the bug over there, our leadership has shown no capacity to handle a threat like this.
Best bet right now is to do just what you're doing- stay informed and stay healthy. It's still very unlikely any of us will see an Ebola case up close and personal (God willing), but it never hurts to make a habit of keeping your hands washed, particularly before you touch your face.
One final thing: I'm more concerned about the enterovirus, EV-68, that got loose in the Midwest. The initial set of cases caused a lot of respiratory distress, and hospitalized a lot of kids. Well, it's being linked to a rather scary paralysis as well. Now, we don't know whether it's the enterovirus itself that's doing this, or whether there's some other bug coming with it that's causing the paralysis.
The problem is that it's in the schools, and that's often where a lot of the reservoir of upper respiratory bugs come from. I'm more worried about this bug than I am about Ebola, frankly. It seems to be mainly a pediatric disease, but it's a scary one, and the timeline of when the outbreak began paints a pretty clear picture as to where it came from.
Stay vigilant and stay safe. Hopefully, this is as bad as it gets. Of course, as many have tried to tell our leadership
You know where to find me if you need me. I'll answer any questions I can, within the scope of my practice and training.
Thanks for reading- have a good rest of the week.
Close it up
Overnight Open Thread -- 10-01-2014: Sentimental Dork Edition
—Damn Dirty RINO
Dear 'Rons 'n 'Ettes,
It was so nice to correspond with you again earlier this week, I felt compelled to take to my keyboard yet again and compose another missive in a futile effort to gain your approval. And since your usual contributor to this space has abandoned you to the grubby clutches of a menagerie of guest-bloggers in favor of people in far-flung, exotic lands, I find myself presented with an opportunity to horn in on his action.
The thing is, I'm not a very interesting guy. That's why I'm not the one out globetrotting and hobnobbing with foreign grandees. Thus, I'm relegated to pecking away at this crumb-laden keyboard from a tumbledown hovel in western Kentucky, all by my lonesome. But that doesn't mean I can't make some worthy contribution to this long-revered institution known as the AoSHQ ONT. If nothing else, I can serve as the counter-example to all the things we should aspire to be.
Believe it or not, I haven't always been this way. I mean, I've always been boring; I just haven't always been self-aware enough to know it. In fact, I once harbored the fatuous notion that I actually had something to say that warranted being recorded in print. It's true. I honestly had the gall to dream of someday being a writer. And, while that seems silly given the benefit of hindsight, I still derive pleasure from playing around with the written word from time to time. It's as much a compulsion as it is a delusion.
“There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed.” ― Ernest Hemingway
“Writing is a socially acceptable form of schizophrenia.” ― E.L. Doctorow
If I had to pin down the origin of my inclination toward writing as a pursuit, I'd have to say it goes back to my early teens, when I whiled away a good bit of my free time composing letters to friends. One of those friends was the girl I considered at the time to be the unrequited love of my life, to whom I once wrote a letter in which I opened a vein that spilled out (if I recall correctly) nearly a dozen college-rule pages of handwritten ardor for her. And, while that love remained unrequited, I never regretted writing it or sending the letter. I do regret falling out of the habit of letter-writing over the years, though.
In an age of electronic everything and instant access to information, I, more than anything in the world, LOVE getting handwritten letters in the mail.
With the introduction of internet though, everything just seems a little bit less personal. There are a lot of wonderful people in my life that unfortunately live far away, and they all deserve a nice, handwritten piece of love … let me see if I can find my pen …
In one of those nostalgic fugues that seem to strike more and more often as I wend my way through my fifth decade of life, I got to thinking the other day about what I gained from writing all those letters. It's not an easy thing to quantify beyond vague, somewhat romantic notions of "personal growth" -- whatever the hell that means. But, there is something undeniably gratifying about making the effort to commit pen to paper for the sole purpose of recording your thoughts and sending them to a person you've been thinking about.
Sadly, the handwritten letter is quickly becoming a lost art -- at least if my experience is indicative of contemporary life in general. Though, you never know what's going to be the next trend. It could come roaring back; in which case, here's a brief etiquette guide.
The best letters will share news and information, mix good with bad news, respond to the questions asked or news shared in a previous letter, and ask about the recipient. Include only information you would be happy for others to see. It is more likely that a mailed letter will stay private; e-mailed ones can easily be forwarded inadvertently or intentionally.
Letters Best Left Unwritten
- Woe-is-me: A letter full of misfortune and unhappiness won’t give your reader pleasure and will leave him or her worried or depressed.
- Tell-all: There’s nothing wrong with pouring your heart out in a letter, but providing too many intimate details could eventually lead to embarrassment.
- Gossip: It’s wrong to tell everything you know about someone’s trials and tribulations, so check your impulse to share.
- Anger: Bitter spoken words fade away, but written words stay on a page forever. Put a letter written in anger aside before sending it. Go back later and maybe you’ll soften the tone or decide not to send it.
By way of example of the "Letters Best Left Unwritten" -- [contains highly NSFW language]:
I know the counsellor said we shouldn’t contact each other during our “cooling off” period but I couldn’t wait anymore.
The day you left, I swore I’d never talk to you again but that was just the wounded little boy in me talkin. Still, I never wanted to be the first one to make contact. In my fantasies, it was always you who would come crawling back to me. I guess my pride needed that. But now I see that my pride’s cost me a lot of thing. I’m tired of pretending I don’t miss you. I don’t care about looking bad anymore.I don;t care who makes the first move as long as one of us does. Maybe it’s time we let our hearts speak as loudyly as our hurt.
This is what my heart says: “There’s no one like you, Connie. I look for you in the eyes and breasts of every woman I see, but they’re not you. They’re not even close.
Two weeks ago, I met this girl at Flamingos and brought her home with me. I don’t say this to hurt you, just to illustrate hte depth of my desperation She was young, maybe 19; with one of those perfect bodies that only youth and maybe a childhood spent ice skating can give you. I mean, just a perfect body.
From there, it just gets brutal. Buh-RU-tuhl.
So, with that little bit of guidance on what not to do, I just wanted to encourage those of you among the Moron Horde who may have some past experience with writing personal letters to consider revisiting it. And to those of you whose experience with correspondence is limited to email and texting, you might want to give it a try. I can promise you it's a good deal more rewarding as both the sender and the recipient.
And with all the maudlin exhortations out of the way, allow me to share a photo I took recently of a friend of mine. And, yes -- it was taken with her knowledge and permission.
Tonight's ONT is sponsored by the United States Postal Service.
Close it up
White House on Travel Bans: Nah
The White House said Wednesday it will not impose travel restrictions or introduce new airport screenings to prevent additional cases of Ebola from entering the United States.
Spokesman Josh Earnest said that current anti-Ebola measures, which include screenings in West African airports and observation of passengers in the United States, will be sufficient to prevent the "wide spread" of the virus.
The chances of a U.S. epidemic are "incredibly low," he said.
Washington Post Reporter Ed O'Keefe Covers "Manipulative," "Semi-Stalkerish" Democrat Fundraising Email Solicitations
Well I was just complaining the media wasn't covering this obvious story.
Including with the "manipulation" angle.
From shaming to semi-stalking, Democrats flood inboxes for last-minute campaign cash
by Ed O'Keefe
Ahead of a quarterly fundraising deadline Tuesday night, Democratic campaign committees and House, Senate and gubernatorial candidates flooded donors’ inboxes with last-minute appeals for campaign cash. The deluge has inspired a tribute site, a parody song and fake fundraising pitches circulating on Twitter.
No link, dude?
I'm linking you.
So here's the reason for the panicky tone of the solicitations:
Robert Epstein, former editor in chief of Psychology Today and senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, said research shows that "people are far more likely to take action to avoid negative events than to produce positive ones."
"Loss is simply more impactful than gain," he said. "People know this intuitively, and so do the campaign managers and others whose job it is to manipulate the masses."
Turns out, my fake solicitations weren't the ones he was referring to. People have been parodying these for a while.
This one's pretty funny:
A Tumblr site, "Emails from the DCCC," started posting fictional e-mails in July. A message it wrote to appear as if it was from Vice President Biden started with the subject line, "There is Literally No Reason Left to Live."
Then there's the song.
An Ohio-based band, Daddy’s Gonna Kill Ralphie, strung together actual subject lines from DCCC e-mails and set them to music that might be strummed by a coffeehouse guitarist.
That song is here. It's... well, I approve of the effort.
Meanwhile, thanks to @rdbrewer4, progressive Thomas B. Edsall notes the hypocrisy in progressive fundraising of "dark money" from plutocrats.
You don't see many pieces in the Establishment Democrat Corporate Media noting this, so, kudos.
Brandon Finigan: The GOP Still Has the Edge in the Senate Derby
His current forecast is GOP 52, Democrats 47, with one independent.
The two states which continue to be hair-tearingly problematic (to use a word I hate): Kansas and North Carolina.
Brandon's also got a forecast on the Decision Desk site -- including (and it's pretty neat) a chart summarizing how all the forecasters rate the up-for-grabs seats.
Imperium: White House Orders Reporters to Not Talk With Crowd at Rally
And the Tina Turner Press continues to take it.
The White House's contempt for the news-gathering process extends to the most petty incidents. On Monday, Michelle Obama came to Milwaukee to campaign for Democrat Mary Burke, who is challenging Governor Scott Walker. To the astonishment of reporter Meg Kissinger of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, aides to Obama and Burke told her she could not talk to the crowd at a Burke event in Milwaukee. "Assigned to cover Michelle Obama’s speech today and was told by a Mary Burke aide and one for the White House that I could not speak to the people in the crowd," she recounted on her Facebook page.
"To say that I was creeped out is an understatement. This is what reporters do in America: we speak to people. At least that’s how I’ve been doing things -- at all kinds of political events -- since 1979."
To her credit, the reporter says she ignored the Imperial Advisory and asked questions.
On the other hand -- why is this only being reported on FaceBook?
Where is the real story running in the real media?
CDC Director Tries to Reassure Public, Fails Abysmally
He actually worries the hell out of me.
I've been noting this for some time. The media and the government -- essentially, these two institutions have fused; they are partner operations in the same corporation -- endlessly peddle fictions to the public on the theory that the public cannot handle the truth, and will panic, or bomb mosques, if they are told the truth.
Witness the government and media assuring us -- falsely -- that Alton Nolen's religion was all but irrelevant to his Jihadi Beheading Rampage.
This interview of the director of the CDC -- the first, best, and only line of defense against a major outbreak of a deadly disease -- with Sanjay Gupta of CNN seems to be of a piece with that idea of telling the morons whatever you have to tell them to keep them quiet and peaceable.
The director of the CDC says that you have no fear of infection by ebola unless you are in direct contact. So, he says to Gupta, neither of us is at any risk of infecting the other just standing here, talking to each other, at a distance of a yard or so.
The CNN anchor in the studio asks about a sneeze, and Gupta then points out that the CDC's own guidelines state that infection is a risk in cases of either direct contact or close proximity of three feet or less with an infected person.
The CDC guy then blathers something about taking each case individually on its own merits or something.
These are general guidelines, and apparently the CDC's own general guidelines do say that close proximity (three feet or less) is enough to create a risk of infection.
"We would look at that" and "it depends on the situation" are very, very different from "no risk" of transmission.
So why is this guy claiming that only direct contact is enough for transmission?
This is very worrisome.
You know what would make me not panic? If the officials in charge of protecting us actually sounded like they knew what the hell they were talking about and weren't forever censoring the truth to keep us from panicking.
And by the way, this guy didn't seem to be prepared to discuss this. He did not have a ready explanation for his seeming contradiction.
Now some of this stuff is complicated, and maybe it's the case that (he seems to have been hinting clumsily at this) if a patient is in his most highly infectious stage, he can transmit it by simply being within close proximity, but in those cases, he would almost certainly be a known ebola victim and kept under medical quarantine.
And maybe he meant that in non-diagnosed cases, the patient may be infectious but not as infectious as in full-blown all-symptoms-presented ebola, and in that case, the case where the public is more likely to encounter such a person, only direct contact will suffice.
But if that's what he meant, he sure didn't do a very good job of explaining it.
And this is the head of the CDC. It's kind of an important part of his job to accurately and articulately broadcast information about public health threats to the public.
So what the hell happened here?
Why was Gupta's question about three-feet-or-less such a curveball for him?
Shouldn't he have been more ready to address that?
What the hell. What the hell.
You tell me if you feel "reassured" by this, or if your doubts about the Expert Officials tasked with protecting us have in fact increased.
Try just treating us like educated adults and fellow citizens with a full right to know the information that affects us and our republic for a change, huh?
The best inoculation against rumor and panic is the truth, the straight truth, the Adult Version of the truth, not the child-safe version of the truth where you tell everyone (as Obama did) that it's "unlikely" that ebola will ever come to the US, or that no one need fear ebola unless he comes into direct physical contact with an infected person.
The government's and media's insistence on withholding information from us that it doesn't think we can handle is causing panic and rumors, not tamping down on them.
Julia Pierson, Director of Secret Service, Resigns In Wake of Embarrassing Disclosures About Agency's Lapses
The wheels of Obama's bus are tall, and roll over obstacles easily.
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said he accepted her resignation and he named Deputy Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to lead an investigation into the Sept. 19 incident in which authorities say Omar Gonzalez scaled the White House fence, made it into the executive mansion and overpowered an officer before being subdued by a second officer.
Mr. Johnson also said he’s convening a panel of independent experts to report back on changes needed at the troubled Secret Service.
She was the first female director of the elite security service.
The #WarOnWomen is calling from inside the house.
(This isn't my joke -- a commenter used it years ago, for some other similar purpose.)
More: At Hot Air, Josh Earnest just defended her this morning.
More importantly: the White House has agreed to an "independent" investigation into the Secret Service's lapses.
I guess on the theory an agency cannot investigate itself.
The Obama administration also says there will be an independent investigation into White House security concerns. pic.twitter.com/mg6x878S7R— Tamara Keith (@tamarakeithNPR) October 1, 2014
So here's my question:
When will the White House agree to an independent investigation of the IRS?
First US Ebola Patient Identified; Second Possible Ebola Patient Under Watch; Schoolkids Monitored for Possible Infection
The first Ebola patient diagnosed in the United States told relatives that he notified health care workers the first time he went to the hospital that he was visiting the U.S. from Liberia, the man's sister said Wednesday.
Mai Wureh told The Associated Press that her brother, Thomas Eric Duncan, went to a Dallas emergency room on Friday and was sent home with antibiotics. He returned two days later after his condition worsened and was admitted to Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital.
Dr. Mark Lester confirmed Wednesday that a nurse asked Duncan on his first visit whether he had been in an area affected by the Ebola outbreak that has killed thousands in West Africa, but that "information was not fully communicated throughout the whole team."
Officials are monitoring 12 to 18 people who may have been exposed to the man, including three members of the ambulance crew that transported him to the hospital and five schoolchildren.
Several questions here. The man from a country in which there is an out-of-control Ebola outbreak. He was visiting the US for ordinary, not extraordinary, reasons: to visit his relatives here.
We have not barred entry from West Africa but it's time to do so. At the very least it's time to restrict entry except in extraordinary circumstances, so that we have fewer visitors, and so that we can actually give each would-be visitor a more serious examination than merely checking them for fever.
At the very least, all travelers from West Africa should be required to check in for a health check (say) three days before their intended flight, and then get checked again on the day of the flight.
This will still permit some infected people to get through -- but hopefully it would catch some people with Ebola symptoms, too.
Duncan might have transmitted Ebola to a second patient, one close to him.
Health officials are closely monitoring a possible second Ebola patient who had close contact with the first person to be diagnosed in the U.S., the director of Dallas County's health department said Wednesday.
All who have been in close contact with the man officially diagnosed are being monitored as a precaution, Zachary Thompson, director of Dallas County Health and Human Services, said in a morning interview with WFAA-TV, Dallas-Fort Worth.
"Let me be real frank to the Dallas County residents: The fact that we have one confirmed case, there may be another case that is a close associate with this particular patient," he said. "So this is real. There should be a concern, but it's contained to the specific family members and close friends at this moment."
At this moment, yes, but it was also contained to a few close family members in West Africa at one point, too.
It is the nature of outbreaks to break out.
I'm not advising panic, of course. But I am advising the government to get a little more serious about this -- even if it means (horror!) disrupting foreign visitors' non-urgent travel plans.
Five kids in a bunch of different Dallas schools are being monitored as well, as a precaution. I assume they came in contact with Patient One or Patient Two but do not exhibit any symptoms of Ebola. Yet.
Dallas ISD superintendent Mike Miles also revealed that five children from four of the district's schools were possibly exposed to the virus.
Miles identified the schools as:
Conrad High School
Tasby Middle School
Hotchkiss Elementary School
Dan D. Rogers Elementary
The patient who was diagnosed with the Ebola virus was staying at a northeast Dallas apartment complex, according to a Dallas police spokesman.
Incidentally, that article notes that there's a large-ish (10,000+) Liberian community in Dallas. Hence the connection.
Meanwhile, even Chris Matthews wants to know why President I Got This told the American public that it was "unlikely" that Ebola would reach America's shores.
Allah disputes the "unlikelihood" of it -- all we're doing is checking people for fever. That's a symptom that might not present itself for days after the actual infection.
So why would Obama say this?
Because he says "Nothing to see here, folks, move on" to everything. He is worried how worries will affect him politically, so he does nothing but offer empty -- and often outright false -- assurances that he's on top of everything.
He's not on top of anything at all except the low rising hill at the sixth hole.
Did any of these political guys see Jurassic Park?
It takes significant efforts to possibly halt a disease from breaking out.
"Life will find a way," Jeff Goldbum's character noted there. And for these purposes, a virus counts as "life."
Romney on a 2016 Bid: "We've got a lot of people looking at the race. We'll see what happens."
Not until today, having read the words of the man himself, have I sincerely believed he might run again. The RomneyWatch(TM) posts are fun to write but not because Mitt 2016 was a real thing -- I thought. They were fun because it wasn’t a real thing. It was a way to collectively pretend-scare ourselves, like playing with a ouija board.
I'm not as scared by this, but I haven't really taken this very seriously. I think Mitt's a good man and I think a good (if very flawed) candidate.
But because this didn't seem really real, none of us had to focus on those flaws. If Romney's candidacy was just a pretend hypothetical blow-off story, we could just talk about the good aspects of Mitt, and think again to the first hour of election night, when many of us still thought he would actually win.
If this is a Real Thing, though, then we have to talk about Romney's failings.
First: Perhaps the highest recommendation for Romney was the idea that he was a together guy, a numbers guy, a great CEO, who would implement a highly effective (if somewhat soulless) campaign.
His campaign was not highly effective. I'm sure John Ekdahl can tell you about that. A frequent taunt of Romney I see is "We hit all of our numbers," referring to the campaign's conviction that they did all the mechanical aspects of campaigning right.
But they didn't.
Add into that a base which was dragged into supporting Romney the first time -- shouting, with some degree of vindicated conviction, that Romney just could not win. I don't know how those who bitterly opposed Romney, but went along with the program reluctantly anyway, can be induced to not go absolutely Nuclear at the prospect of a second Romney candidacy.
I think DrewM's head would actually explode. I like DrewM. I worry about his head exploding. Heads shouldn't explode. It's not right.
And of course add in Romney's lack of any sort of emotional connection with the electorate. Perhaps his great humbling of 2012 makes him more "relatable;" but I don't know how much that gets you. Political charisma is something someone has or doesn't have. It's not fair that idiots like Obama have it, or scoundrels like Clinton, or that good men like Paul Tsongas don't have it.
But politics aren't fair.
I really don't know about this. I'm predisposed to liking Romney -- as the election went on, I came to actually like him and see the human inside of him -- but, putting that to one side, I don't know.
Allah discusses the implications for a Jeb Bush bid. Romney has indicated he wouldn't run if Jeb did. Does this mean that Jeb isn't running? Or does it mean that Romney had assumed Jeb would be a strong candidate but now, having seen the first few moves Jeb has made, has decided that Jeb isn't much of a candidate and so should not be the Center Right's representative in the 2016 derby?
Or does it just mean that Romney does in fact have "President Disease," as one wag put it, and won't be able to shake it until he either becomes president or is so thoroughly crushed that the idea becomes hateful to him?
I don't know. But I guess we have to start talking seriously about all this now.
Wednesday Morning News Dump
- A US Senate Race Refresher
- All The Facts Fit To Delete
- Obama Stands Aloof From America's Four Foreign Policy Traditions
- Secret Service Missed Man With Gun In Elevator With Obama
- Futures Trading
- School Board Tells Homeschool Family Curriculum Must Be Guided By Common Core Standards
- Time: Ebola Blah Blah Climate Change Blah Blah
- WH Huddles While ISIS Advances Towards Turkey
- In A Stunning Development, Turns Out Islamist Oklahoma Headchopper Is Also A Racist
- Hong Kong Protesters Brace For A Holiday Test
- GOP Celebrates Unhappy Second Anniversary of Obamacare
- CDC Issue Ebola Guidelines For US Funeral Homes
- Google Climate Name Calling
- Why Isn't The Media Outraged About The Kansas City Chiefs?
- Obama's Mixed Messages On War
Follow me on twitter.
Top Headline Comments 10-1-14
Fueled by this summer's bad news, Fox News just had the most-watched quarter in primetime across cable, something it hasn't managed in more than a decade. Also reruns of Shark Tank on CNBC outperformed every single telecast on MSNBC.
Hundreds were poisoned from contaminated chicken at a Food Safety Summit. "The outbreak was the first in the 16-year history of the Food Safety Summit."
AoSHQ Weekly Podcast | Stitcher | Download | Ask The Blog | Archives
ONT 9/30/14 - Homework Edition [krakatoa]
YeeIkes. Tuesday already.
Time flies when you have a 7 month old. Some people say it's the added responsibility, the extra work just to get an extra human being through the day, or even just a defense mechanism against remembering in vivid detail what just came out of your perfect little mini-you.
I say it's all the Scotch.
Or in this case, Bulleit Rye, which is my new favorite. It's not terribly pricey, it has a unique flavor, it's smooth, and after the first sip or two, it completely dulls the pain of Val-U-Rite Vodka's well known side effect, open throat ulcers. Or, according to science, Cancer. But then you give a moron enough of anything *, and he or she is sure to get some disease.
So I volunteered to be your Tuesday diversion. Your regularly scheduled ONT host has better things to do, although we promised to tell the regular readers that he misses them greatly, and it is with great regret that he had to foist you off on guest bloggers so that he could pursue "job responsibilities". And then he said something about some tentacle pr0n conference, and a asked whether "these rhinestones make my Cthulothario costume too 'effeminate'". We assured him it was probably the Freddy Mercury mustache, of all things, that was making people uncomfortable.
Anyway, on to the festivities.
Let's get the ugly out up top. After that opening, I know what everyone is thinking: "Homework? Double-U, Tee-Eff?"
I don't know how many of you read the sidebar.
Hell, I don't know if any of you can actually read. Much less type. I certainly don't follow up on the comments and try to decipher what most often can be charitably described as the crack-addled spasms of a 3-fingered epileptic. **
But for those of you that can read, and can form complete sentences, did you happen to check out the sidebar item on creepy "true" reddit stories?
I blew more time than I like to admit there, having experienced my share of crazy stuff in my life. Haunted house, haunted apartment, UFO sighting, the drive by Area 51 complete with crazy giant jackrabbits vaulting our vehicle while we did 50 mph and ghostly flying creatures that could best be described as albino giant bats... and I know it's all true because I have super-explicit memories of them. You might say those memories are scientific.
So tomorrow, I want you to blow off work, or slut-shaming, or whatever your day job is and read some of those stories to get in the mood, and then tomorrow night, just crap all over that ONT with your own creepy stories.
Or hell, be a real go-getter and post them here tonight for extra credit.
I got nothing with meat to talk about. Slow news day, and you can only talk about Obama's snowballing sideshow of a presidency so often.
Maybe some fun pictures to soften the experience.
Obama's response to various scandals, crises and golf junkets as described by the MSM:
Obama's various solutions, in reality:
I had this in my back pocket --- apologies if this made a previous ONT, but it segues in with the concept of unintended consequences when the government decides to DO ANYTHING! Among other things, more cobras than you can shake a press secretary at.
But that's no fun. Let's see... how about something that will provide some distraction from the existential nightmare that is the contemporary Western world.
I know what you're thinking. Family Feud, amiright? This is a list of FF answers that "Caused Steve Harvey to Lose His Faith In Humanity."
That said, I think the response to this one was about as affirming as you could possibly hope for.
This ONT brought to you by Male Models. Because chicks need support too.
* Especially: Spare Time.
Also: If you have a little extra, think about giving to LibertyChick.
Close it up
Ebola: EVERYONE SETTLE DOWN (tmi3rd)
Hi there, Morons and Moronettes.
As we're all aware, the first confirmed case of Ebola (that we didn't bring here deliberately) has made it to our shores, and is currently in strict isolation at Dallas Presbyterian Hospital.
This, obviously, is not good news, but let's get everyone up to speed on how Ebola works, how you stay away from it, how it's spread, and a few other bits.
More below the fold...
First of all:
Seriously, folks- I used to work emergency medicine at a hospital in Fort Worth. Whenever something scary gets going disease-wise, everybody and their grandmother descends upon the emergency room. If you're not absolutely sure you've got something you need urgently looked at, call the doctor's office and either go see them the next day or talk to whoever's on call. Most doctors' offices have an answering service for that very reason.
We saw this happen with a couple of ugly influenza strains in '09 and '10- it eats up all our resources, and all of a sudden, you've got a waiting room full of people who are scared, irritable, and having to wait a long time. That seldom goes well, and you mainly wind up exposed to the disease that the guy next to you actually has.
The bottom line is that you'll show up at the emergency room and it'll look like the entrance to a Best Buy before opening on Black Friday.
So please, don't panic. Now let's talk about how the bug works...
The Ebola virus disease is caused by a virus called the Ebola virus (I know, Captain Obvious), or EBOV, and it causes a usually-fatal hemorrhagic fever. Hemorrhagic fevers are thought to cause disseminated intravascular coagulation, which is a nice way of saying that your blood goes through its clotting mechanism within your blood vessels without clumping. This eats up your ability to form clots where and when you really need them. This, in turn, leads to all sorts of other systemic problems that I won't bore/scare you with; the Wikipedia entry on it details this just fine.
The important part of this is how Ebola is spread, and thus how you avoid it.
First of all, this is believed to be the Ebola Zaire strain. The Ebola Zaire strain is NOT- I repeat, NOT airborne. Thus, you can only get Ebola Zaire by handling body fluids of an infected or dead Ebola patient.
Body fluids- as obvious as this may seem- include (but are not limited to) blood, sweat, tears, vomit, urine, feces, semen, vaginal secretions, and the like. You can also get it by contact with contaminated medical equipment that has come into contact with infected or dead patients. Finally, you can also get it by coming into direct contact with infected animals (like eating infected meat, which is believed to be part of how this epidemic got going in the first place).
Equally important- and I want to emphasize this- Ebola can only be spread human-to-human AFTER SYMPTOMS BEGIN. Symptoms can pop up anywhere from two days to three weeks after exposure. If they're not sick after three weeks, they're not going to get sick, and this has been established.
Now, the Dallas patient was symptomatic and out of the hospital for a total of four days. Certainly, anyone this cat came into contact with is at risk, but remember: it's very contagious but not as easily transmitted. If you're in the D/FW area, just stay calm.
So what are the symptoms? Well, unfortunately, they look a lot like the onset of cold, flu, malaria, dengue, et cetera. Here's the list (pay attention to (pay attention to the early stuff; if you get to the back end, you're already in trouble):
Here's what the virus looks like:
Just like with any viral disease, there is no actual cure for it (we've never actually cured a virus in human history), but that doesn't mean we can't treat the symptoms. We do that through what we call supportive care: we pump fluids into you to keep your blood volume up and to keep you from dehydrating, we give you stuff to get the fever down and keep the pain at bay, we may give you blood if you need it, and so forth.
So to wrap this up, here's the story: yeah, having a case loose in a major metropolitan area is a bad thing. Yeah, having this cat loose in the public with Ebola is a very bad thing.
You get past it in public by washing your hands frequently, and by not touching your face- don't give a bug a door to come in, whether it be the common cold all the way to Zombie Maker or whatever. Cover your mouth and nose if you cough or sneeze, and all the things you're used to doing as we get into cold and flu season.
If you're genuinely getting sick and you're worried, by all means, have someone take a look at you, but please don't panic. The emergency rooms are going to be busy for probably the next month with people overreacting (it always works out that way), and you're going to wait a lot longer to be seen, at the very least.
I hope this helps- as I'm currently an EMT trying to get into medical school, I can't give you medical advice much beyond "have someone look at you", but if you need me for something, you can always find me on Twitter.
Here's the CDC's information sheet on the outbreak, and there's a great infographic at the link as well.
Y'all just stay safe, informed, and aware, and this'll hopefully just be a bad memory in about a month.
Close it up
I've been looking for a nightcap story and I just decided to give up three seconds ago.
The best I got is Mollie Hemingway's report that yes, Saturday Night Live is not merely terrible.
It's been terrible for years. What it is now is frankly embarrassing. The show has a real amateur dinner theater shenanigans vibe to it now.
Remember Senior Follies when seventeen year olds with no comedic ability would get on stage and do sketches?
Yeah, it was bad. Plus, the popular kids tended to get it into their heads that they were So Cute that they would naturally entertain people just by being adorable.
That's what Saturday Night Live is -- the Senior Follies of a school you didn't go to featuring superannuated seniors who aren't adorable.
A Break From The Constant Cycle Of Horrible News
Finally, some good news.
First US Case of Ebola Confirmed In Dallas
Confirmed by the CDC.
"The patient is an adult with a recent history of travel to West Africa," said Texas' Department of State Health Services, in a statement. "The patient developed symptoms days after returning to Texas from West Africa and was admitted into isolation on Sunday at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas."
Meanwhile, Kent Brantly, the doctor who survive his ebola infection, calls the outbreak "a fire from the pit of Hell."
Prosecutor: Sure Alton Nolen Was "Infatuated with Beheadings" and Sure, Maybe He Used Some "Arabic Words" While He Was Beheading That Woman, But This Sure Looks to Me Like Plain Ol' Workplace Violence
An Oklahoma man apparently uttered Arabic words during an attack in which he allegedly severed a co-worker's head, and had "some sort of infatuation with beheadings," but the killing appeared to have more to do with the man's suspension from his job than his recent conversion to Islam, a prosecutor said Tuesday.
The statement is technically defensible -- it is possible the man's termination had "more to do" with the sudden decision to go jihad that his fascination with jihad -- but it sure seems aimed to suggest that jihad had nothing to do with this.
By the way, if you're wondering why I say his firing did have something to do with it: Well, the timing. He did this immediately after (or during) the "process of being terminated." Surely that is not a coincidence.
However, he just as surely had a predisposition to publicly behead women, and it is not really a mystery from whence his predisposition came.
I'll just post one more quote:
"There was some sort of infatuation with beheadings. It seemed to be related to his interest in killing someone that way," Cleveland County Prosecutor Greg Mashburn said. "Other than that, it seemed to be related to his being suspended earlier in the day."
Other than that.
Update: Other than this.
On March 7th, Nolen added an image to his Timeline which shows a partially decapitated man with someone standing over him pulling his head back to show the wound. Above the image there is a quote which reads, "Thus do we find the clear precedent that explains the peculiar penchant of Islamic terrorists to behead their victims: it is merely another precedent bestowed by their Prophet." Just below the image is a citation from the Quran, "I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off of them."
Great Ad Slams Mary Landrieu As Absentee Senator Who's Done Nothing to Help Black Constituents
Really good ad.
Josh Kraushaar: Obama's Pass-the-Buck Presidency
Earlier today, on Twitter, I was asking why the media does not see the pattern of Obama's dissembling and ducking of responsibility. They seem to now realize he's lying about his subordinates failing to warn him about ISIS:
Obama has had accurate intelligence about ISIS since BEFORE the 2012 election, says administration insider
A national security staffer in the Obama administration said the president has been seeing 'highly accurate predictions' about the rise of the ISIS terror army since 'before the 2012 election'
Obama insisted in his campaign speeches that year that America was safe and al-Qaeda was 'on the run'
The president said during Sunday's '60 Minutes' program that his Director of National Intelligence had conceded he underestimated ISIS
But the administration aide insisted that Obama's advisers gave him actionable information that sat and gathered dust for more than a year
'He knew what was at stake,' the aide said of the president, and 'he knew where all the moving pieces were'
Obama takes daily intelligence briefings in writing, he explained, because no one will be able to testify about warning the president in person about threats that the White House doesn't act on
That whole piece is good. Those are just the up-top bullet points.
So why doesn't the media see the pattern? Obama absented himself from oversight of HealthCare.org, then claimed it was all Kathleen Seblius' fault, for example.
Why don't they connect the dots? This is not an isolated incident; this is the central defining mode of Obama's presidency.
Well, John Kraushaar of the National Journal does see the pattern in all these matters, and lays a bunch of them out.
I really suggest you read this whole thing, but I'll just quote a little, for the lazy:
The elements of the administration's blame, deny, and wait-it-out communications strategy has been front and center amid all the recent controversies. When the administration badly botched the launch of the health care exchange website, Obama said he was "not informed directly that the website would not be working the way it was supposed to." This, for his signature achievement in office. Blame was later pinned on Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who left the administration in April.
When officials at the Internal Revenue Service improperly targeted conservative outside groups for scrutiny, Obama first feigned outrage, saying he had "no patience for" the misconduct. But months later, as the public's anger subsided, Obama said there "wasn't even a smidgen of corruption" at the agency, and the administration has done little to hold anyone accountable since.
The administration's approach to controversies was best crystallized by former National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor, who deflected criticism about allegations that talking points on the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, were altered for political reasons. "Dude, this was two years ago," he told Bret Baier of Fox News. The remarks were perceived as flippant, but they underscored the success of the administration's public-relations strategy. Buy enough time, and inevitably problems tend to go away--especially in today's attention-deprived environment.
He doesn't say so, but add into that: Especially given a media that affirmatively wants Obama to get away with it, and so will consciously join in his scheme of burying Obama's bad news the moment they feel Obama has successfully deprived the story of enough oxygen to smother it.
More: The Judge in Pruitt Scolds the Obama Champions of the Judicial Branch
Gabe pointed this out as noteworthy, and I think he's right.
In concluding his ruling, the judge in Pruitt takes time to note the "apocalyptic language" used by the dissent in Halbig (the DC circuit case in which the majority found similarly that the IRS had acted lawlessly).
He notes that a lot of these objections have little do with the actual law or the actual guidelines judges follow when interpreting Congress' law.
A lot of their objections just seem to be of the flavor, "Well if we let these monsters win, Obama's policy goals will be thwarted!"
The judge here chides them for assuming the posture of a political advocate, concerned not with the law but with "helping" certain people (and, coincidentally I'm sure, certain Presidents).
The court is aware that the stakes are higher in the case at bar than they might be in another case. The issue of consequences has been touched upon in the previous decisions discussed. Speaking of its decision to vacate the IRS Rule, the majority in Halbig stated "[w]e reach this conclusion, frankly, with reluctance." Other judges in similar litigation have cast the plaintiffs' argument in apocalyptic language. The first sentence of Judge Edwards' dissent in Halbig is as follows: "This case is about Appellants' not-so-veiled attempt to gut the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ('ACA')." Concurring in King, Judge Davis states that “[a]ppellants' approach would effectively destroy the statute . . . ." Further, "[w]hat [appellants] may not do is rely on our help to deny to millions of Americans desperately-needed health insurance. . . "
Of course, a proper legal decision is not a matter of the court "helping" one side or the other. A lawsuit challenging a federal regulation is a commonplace occurrence in this country, not an affront to judicial dignity. A higher-profile case results in greater scrutiny of the decision, which is understandable and appropriate. "[H]igh as those stakes are, the principle of legislative supremacy that guides us is higher still. . . This limited role serves democratic interests by ensuring that policy is made by elected, politically accountable representatives, not by appointed life-tenured judges."
This is a case of statutory interpretation. "The text is what it is, no matter which side benefits." Such a case (even if affirmed on the inevitable appeal) does not "gut" or "destroy" anything. On the contrary, the court is upholding the Act as written.
Congress is free to amend the ACA to provide for tax credits in both state and federal exchanges, if that is the legislative will. As the Act presently stands, "vague notions of a statute's 'basic purpose' are nonetheless inadequate to overcome the words of its text regarding the specific issue under consideration. It is a "core administrative-law principle that an agency may not rewrite clear statutory terms to suit its own sense of how the statute should operate."
"If Congress enacted into law something different from what it intended, then it should amend the statute to conform to its intent."
(All internal citations omitted -- quoted language is from other cases, obviously, but I didn't feel like formatting all that crap.)
Oh and I meant to note this earlier, but forgot: Remember Jon Gruber, who declared that it was "absurd" that that Congress could possibly intend to withhold subsidies from states that didn't set up their own exchanges?
And then was found talking at conferences stating that that was in fact Congress' intent, and that it all made perfect sense?
He gets name-checked in a footnote:
Flip-flopping hack Jonathan Gruber makes an appearance in a lengthy footnote, of course. pic.twitter.com/DLGMPO1bLy— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) September 30, 2014
And I have to correct something: A "circuit split" occurs when the circuit courts of appeals split.
I misinterpreted Gabe. We do not have a circuit split yet, as I think only one appeals court (the Fourth Circuit) has has ruled on this on the circuit level, the appeals level. And there, they claimed that the law could be stretched as Obama liked.
All of the other rulings are from the originating (trial) courts.
Gabe's point was that he doesn't expect the Supreme Court to wait for a bona-fide split, but will probably take an appeal earlier, given the importance of the cases.
That error was mine, not Gabe's.
Oklahoma Federal Court Rules IRS Attempt to Save Obamacare's Subsidies for Federal Exchange Enrollees "Arbitrary, Capricious, an Abuse of Discretion, and Otherwise Not In Accordance with the Law"
BOOM. Pruitt just came out in Oklahoma. IRS subsidy expansion to fed. exchanges is "arbitrary and capricious." #halbig— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) September 30, 2014
Here's the bottom line in Pruitt v. Burwell: pic.twitter.com/39Gb9JZsTI— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) September 30, 2014
It is not often you see a district court judge chiding circuit court judges for being hysterical, as here. pic.twitter.com/lWaznrpIwl— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) September 30, 2014
The full decision is here.
If you're coming in late to this, or have forgotten, this concerns the IRS granting those who enroll into Obamacare in the federal exchanges the same subsidies as are granted to those who enroll in the state exchanges.
The problem is that the law only specifies subsidies for state exchange enrollees. It appears this was intended to be an encouragement for states to set up their exchanges.
But 26 or so states opted out -- but Obama's IRS, desperate to save his bacon with lots of enrollees, decided that by administrative rule they would trump the law passed by Congress and just rule that anyone signed up for Obamacare should have subsidies.
A federal court in Oklahoma has ruled otherwise.
Now, a DC circuit court also ruled this way a few months ago -- but that is now going to an en banc rehearing, and as the full court is stuffed full with progressives (thanks to Harry Reid's nuclear option), it is widely expected that the full progressive court will countermand the three-judge panel which issued the ruling.
As Gabe says-- Correction; Gabe did not say this; I misinterpreted him; see my full correction below -- this seems to insure that there's a split in the lower courts (there were some liberal judges who ruled that the administrative law-making was a-ok with them), thus dramatically increasing the odds that the Supreme Court will have to rule on the matter.
Correction: And I have to correct something: A "circuit split" occurs when the circuit courts of appeals split.
I misinterpreted Gabe. We do not have a circuit split yet, as I think only one appeals court (the Fourth Circuit) has has ruled on this on the circuit level, the appeals level.
All of the other rulings are from the originating (trial) courts.
Gabe's point was that he doesn't expect the Supreme Court to wait for a bona-fide split, but will probably take an appeal earlier, given the importance of the cases.
That error was mine, not Gabe's.
Obama Has Attended Less Than Half His Presidential Daily Briefings
And even in the 41% of security briefings he did attend, he spent the most time carpet-putting. (I assume -- but you know I'm right.)
President Pushback is putting out the word that while he may not care about the United States' security to show up for briefings, he reads each report with keen interest, but...
1. That's just him saying that. If he showed up for the actual briefings, we'd have an actual record of his presence. But when he claims "I read the Dickens out of these reports when no one's around," that's just Obama giving you his word that he's awesome.
Anyone still eager to take the word of Barack Obama?
2. The suggestion is made that he is very interested indeed in reading these things. However, when someone is very interested in something, they tend to make additional time for it. Like, say, the time necessary to show up for an hour briefing on the security situation of the United States.
So I don't think he's very interested at all. It seems to be like homework he doesn't want to do.
3. If the president were keenly interested in these matters, he'd want to be physically present for the briefing, so he could ask questions. How confident are you about this prediction? What is this based on? Are there additional possibilities you're not considering?
Obama can't ask such questions of a piece of paper.
I don't believe he asks many questions. (I'll get to that in a second.) Because he doesn't really care.
4. I think Obama's proxies, the guys he makes go to the briefings so that he can watch episodes of Homeland, brief him later, but this is second-hand nonsense, and furthermore, toadying minions will tell the boss what he wants to hear, and avoid telling him what they know he doesn't want to hear, won't they?
I mention that because of fact noted by even arch-liberal Norah O'Donnell, that there is a public paper record of Obama being warned about the rise of ISIS, and yet Obama is simultaneously claiming that he was never so warned, and that other people dropped the ball and let him down.
Well I don't believe a word Obama says, but it should be noted these two claims are in fact reconcilable if you make this assumption:
The intelligence committee did in fact repeatedly warn Obama's minions, attending the briefings and reading the briefings on Obama's behalf, but then his minions, knowing that Obama did not want to deal with any of this and pretty much just wants to go out and do #TheBearIsLoose photo ops with his dwindling number of fans, soft-pedaled it or ignored it entirely.
Obama claims he read this stuff. But going to the briefings would have done something important -- had he attended, he would have been confronted with the information in the briefings.
He would not been able to get a Minion to pipe down about all this IS bother by putting on his Bored Face and then asking "What else you got?" or whatever other signals he uses to indicate that he's got a tee time in 20 minutes.
Being absent from the briefings permits him to cocoon himself from things he doesn't want to think about or deal with, which is of course one of this president's deepest and most dangerous psychological traits.
A Couple of Silly Things Then I'll Start Working
Neil Tyson, apparently, now knows that Bush referred to the God who named the stars in 2003, not 2001, and in relation to the deaths of the crew of the space shuttle Columbia, not in relation to Al Qaeda, terrorism, or Islam generally.
Someone asked him when he intended to apologize:
@cfchabris Thanks. Sure, I plan to say something like that soon. I’m looking for a good medium & occasion.— Neil deGrasse Tyson (@neiltyson) September 28, 2014
Now, in case you don't know this, Neil Tyson's Cultists have a bizarre fetish for quoting him, marrying that quote to a dramatic/cool picture of him, and (often) adding a Star Field behind him, to show that Tyson is a Savior sent to us from the Stars to deliver his Wisdom.
Don't believe me? Google it, b*tch.
The one at the end of this list is particularly obnoxious.
So John Ekdahl decided to give Tyson's new quote -- trying to figure out the right "medium" to apologize to Bush on, implicitly admitting he was wrong all along -- the Starborne Savior treatment.
Meanwhile I got annoyed with the Democrats' never-ending fundraising emails. They tend to go like this:
You stood with us in 2008. Will you stand with us now, when your President needs you?
Please send $3 -- we must roll back the Republicans' anti-woman agenda.
They start with "Hey-" because telemarketers have found that many emails from actual friends begin that way, so it's a manner of tricking the eye into stopping at the email slugline. Then they pretend a friendship that doesn't exist -- all of these emails are written as if Nancy Pelosi or Barack Obama have a personal relationship with the addressee -- and conjure up some dire emergency just over the horizon.
Then they ask you for money. They often ask for $3, which is not a lot of money, of course ($3 barely covers the costs of processing the credit card transaction), but that $3 indicates the sender is a "live one" -- a Glengarry lead -- and also invests that person emotionally in the cause.
It's a well-known trick of psychological manipulation that if you can get someone to make a small gesture -- a token donation -- the very act of making that tiny donation will tend to make them more emotionally invested in the cause than they otherwise would have been. Now that they have "skin in the game," as it were, even just a tiny amount of skin, they become more reliable partisans in all aspects, from donating further to increasing likelihood of voting to donating time to canvas and so forth.
I think this effect is related to the psychological failing that keeps people at casinos trying to win back all the money they lost (and losing even more money). Once someone has a Sunk Cost, they will be irrationally invested in redeeming that Sunk Cost, in turning that Cost into a Win.
So these emails are crafted by psychological manipulation experts drawn hailing from the shabby field of telemarketing and cold-call high-pressure sales.
And the Democrats send millions of them every day.
So I decided to give them a taste of their own medicine. I began soliciting Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama with the same sorts of manipulative messages, begging for money.
Skip through the first bunch of tweets (which basically duplicate what I just wrote above) to get to the ones where I start asking Nancy Pelosi to contribute to my cause.
Hey- @nancypelosi, you have walked with me in the past. Will you stand with me now? Please send me $15 for Arby's.— iLoveScienceSexually (@AceofSpadesHQ) September 29, 2014
Tuesday Morning News Dump
- The Gelded Age
- Everything You Need To Know About 43 Topics Vox Knows Everything About
- Politico Finally Started Asking Tough Questions About The Clintons
- Obama Betrays The Kurds
- Bill Maher And Me
- Valerie Jarret Appears In Prime Time TV Show
- Iraq Was Then, Syria Is Now
- Choosing Fortune Over Freedom
- My Aggravating Year With Obamacare
- ISIS Advances Just Outside Of Baghdad
- The New McCarthyism
- Media Matters Petulant Attack On George Will
- ISIS To Open A Consul In Turkey
- Yeah Buzzfeed Andrew, We Totally Believe You
- Is Mark Udall A 9/11 Truther?
Follow me on twitter.
Top Headline Comments 9-30-14
Director of the USSS Julia Pierson will testify today before House Oversight about the recent security breach. WSJ has a timeline describing how the details of the incident have evolved.
Ed Morrissey is covering the Extraordinary Synod from the Vatican. What a cool opportunity.
A U.S. air strike last week almost took out a headquarters of our allies, the Free Syrian Army. Whoops. A lack of coordination with the FSA, which Obama proposes to train and arm, gets blamed.
Hundreds of thousands face the (extended) income- and citizenship-verification deadline today for Obamacare subsidies. "White House officials pointed to the health law's requirement that people who are proven to be ineligible for subsidies have to pay them back, but said additional guidance on how to do that will be provided later." Mmmhmm.
The U.S. and Afghanistan have signed a security pact to allow almost 10,000 U.S. troops to remain in the country.
AoSHQ Weekly Podcast | Stitcher | Download | Ask The Blog | Archives
Overnight Open Thread -- 9/29/2014: Corpulent RINO Edition
—Damn Dirty RINO
Good evening, 'Rons n' 'Ettes! It's been a spell since I was last permitted to darken the hallowed pages of AoSHQ. But, since your regular ONT provider purportedly has something more important to do, and I called dibs for tonight's iteration, I reckon you'll just have to swallow hard and accept whatever half-assed excuse for infotainment I manage to cobble together in the next couple of hours, or so.
Some of you may recall that I was a bartender the last time I encroached upon this otherwise estimable space. Well, thanks to a shitstorm apocalyptic proportion, I was unceremoniously relieved of those duties a little over a month ago. Since then, I've found employment in a somewhat different industry -- that is, chicken farming. I learned a lot in my first few weeks as a farmhand, first and foremost being that I'm too damned fat and out of shape to be a farmhand. Here's a fair approximation of the physical activity I typically engaged in prior to my unexpected career change.
But, after a few weeks of perseverance through searing agony, my body has adapted to the demands of the job. Yes, I'm still dog-tired at the end of the day, but I can manage a full day of carrying feed buckets the length of eight 520' chicken barns, doubling back several times in each one. And I'm doing it largely without pain. The only problem is, I'm old. And, being old, I didn't seem to be shedding the considerable beer gut I'd developed over years of tending bar. And, frankly, I'm highly skeptical of recent studies showing that the ladies quite dig men sporting the distended abdomen look.
According to a recent study commissioned to mark the DVD release of “Bad Neighbors,” starring Zac Efron and Seth Rogen, three in four British women prefer men with a bit of a belly over one rocking washboard abs when it comes to relationships.
The full results of the study are here, but the basic verdict is women prefer relationships with a man who makes them feel confident, not threatened. A man with a bit of a gut is likely not as concerned with appearances as a gym rat may be. Ergo, we feel less judged.
While that may be a comforting thought, experience has taught me otherwise. You don't just stroll up to some babe at the grocery store with a John Goodman physique and expect David Beckham results -- at least not of you're a blue-collar schlub like myself. And, with that in mind, I've decided to make some minor lifestyle adjustments.
Now, let me just stipulate that I'm not angling for the washboard stomach that's all the rage these days. That doesn't strike me as a realistic goal at this point. You see, I'm a man of appetites with an unfortunate tendency toward inertia in my downtime. I'm no Glenn Reynolds; this is about as close to six pack abs as I'm likely to get anytime soon:
But, I do have reasonably good muscle tone for a dude with four-plus decades on the planet -- especially for one who's spent as much time holding down barstools as I have. And I have no plans to eliminate that [in]activity from my admittedly debauched lifestyle. But, I have made some adjustments -- like cutting back on the beer and going back to a couple of old favorites: cheap scotch and gin and tonic. For those of you who may also have a taste for cheap scotch and have yet to try it, allow me to humbly recommend Hankey Bannister.
As I said, I am a man of appetites, and I'm not keen on denying them. And, yes, that does make losing the gut a bit of a challenge. But, some years ago, I came up with a system that worked pretty well for me. Essentially, I stopped all between-meal eating and started eating less fattening foods by cutting back on bread, potatoes [my greatest weakness], and sugar. Not foregoing them completely, mind you, but eating them in smaller quantities while making an effort to eat more of the things I like that are actually pretty good for me. I do this Monday through Saturday. And then, when Sunday comes around, I eat whatever the hell I want to eat, and as much as I want of it.
Obviously, that won't work for everyone. But, it worked for me the last time I tried it, and it seems to be working for me now. But, there are other ways of dropping a few pounds that aren't tantamount to masochism. Some scientist at Cornell thinks he's come up with a few.
“One thing that happens with people who are overweight is that they often feel their situation isn’t solvable, and they are on the verge of giving up,” explains Wansink. “What we’ve found over and over is that making one small change, like eating off a smaller plate, leads to a small weight loss, and then that triggers making more changes. Within a year, a person’s lost 35 pounds without ever ‘dieting.’ That’s our goal.”
“It’s so much easier to be ‘slim by design’ than by using willpower,” Wansink says. “You make one change, it’s done. Willpower is a 24/7 unending job.”
I have no idea how much weight I've lost. I don't even own a scale. I judge my weight by simply looking down at my waist from time to time, and by which holes in my belt I have to use to keep my pants up. I've cinched my belt up two holes over the past two weeks. That's probably a hundred pounds. Idunno. And all I've had to do is eat more green beans and salads, drink unsweetened tea and water (sometimes with lemon) instead of sweet tea and soft drinks with meals, and not run to the freezer for ice cream just before bedtime.
And, with a little diligence, maybe the next time I find myself on vacation in Panama City Beach, I won't be mortified at the notion of walking around shirtless on the beach. Speaking of which, here are a few shots I grabbed while I was there about a month ago:
Close it up
The World is Stupid - Also MNF
—Dave In Texas
I had to deal with a kid's car today and I got off cheap.
SO I got that goin for me, which is nice.
Patriots. Chiefs. Chiefs is likely the next target.
And Speaking of Major Security Breaches: Al Qaeda Claims Guilt for Rocket Attack on US Embassy in Yemen
Before getting to that, let me link this, which half of you have already mentioned in comments.
The White House insisted Monday that the U.S. counterterrorism strategy in Yemen is a model for the fight against the Islamic State -- despite the country being engulfed by a violent political crisis that last week led the Obama administration to remove some of its diplomats and urge American citizens to leave.
The White House, though, is standing by claims that the country is a "useful model" for dealing with militants elsewhere. Press Secretary Josh Earnest on Monday claimed fighters in Yemen remain under "continual pressure" from the U.S. despite the latest unrest.
Now, as to that rocket attack.
The State Department claimed that US personnel were being evacuated out of an "abundance of caution."
This phrase is usually meant to mean that there is no actual serious threat -- that steps are being taken in the absence of a serious threat, just to be completely, abundantly on the safe side of things.
But common words and phrases do not mean the same thing when spoken by this administration.
When this administration says it's evacuating personnel out of an "abundance of caution," what they mean is that the capital is overrun and Al Qaeda are shooting rockets are our embassy.
This is like saying "My house was on fire, so, out of an abundance of caution, I called the fire department. Just in case the flames did not choose to self-extinguish harmlessly."
An Al Qaeda splinter group launched a rocket attack on the U.S. embassy in Sanaa on Saturday, injuring several guards, to retaliate for what it said on social media was a U.S. drone strike in a northern province the day before.
The rocket landed 200 meters from the heavily fortified embassy, which lies in a compound surrounded by high walls, hitting members of the Yemeni special police force who guard the site. At least two were injured, police said.
The guards injured by the rocket attack were taken to a hospital, out of an abundance of caution.
Five O'Clock Follies have nothing on this crew.
White House Fence Jumper Made It Into the East Room; 2011 Shooting Incident Downplayed by Secret Service Revealed to Have Been More Serious Than Claimed
This 2011 incident was -- well, let me say, as non-provocatively as possible, not reported accurately to the public.
In 2011, a gunman fired a rifle at the White House (when Obama was not present, but members of his family were). Seven bullets hit the White House.
Do you remember reading about that?
Well, if not, there's a reason for that.
A bullet smashed a window on the second floor, just steps from the first family’s formal living room. Another lodged in a window frame, and more pinged off the roof, sending bits of wood and concrete to the ground....
Then came an order that surprised some of the officers. "No shots have been fired. . . . Stand down," a supervisor called over his radio. He said the noise was the backfire from a nearby construction vehicle.
By the end of that Friday night, the agency had confirmed a shooting had occurred but wrongly insisted the gunfire was never aimed at the White House. Instead, Secret Service supervisors theorized, gang members in separate cars got in a gunfight near the White House’s front lawn -- an unlikely scenario in a relatively quiet, touristy part of the nation’s capital.
It took the Secret Service four days to realize that shots had hit the White House residence, a discovery that came about only because a housekeeper noticed broken glass and a chunk of cement on the floor.
It's an important article, with some real reporting going on (for a change).
On the heels of that comes another story in which the Secret Service seems to have seriously downplayed how far an attacker penetrated White House grounds.
Spoiler Alert: The East Room.
The man who jumped the White House fence this month and sprinted through the front door made it much farther into the building than previously known, overpowering one Secret Service officer and running through much of the main floor, according to three people familiar with the incident.
An alarm box near the front entrance of the White House designed to alert guards to an intruder had been muted at what officers believed was a request of the usher's office, said a Secret Service official who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The officer posted inside the front door appeared to be delayed in learning that the intruder, Omar Gonzalez, was about to burst through. Officers are trained that, upon learning of an intruder on the grounds, often through the alarm boxes posted around the property, they must immediately lock the front door.
After barreling past the guard immediately inside the door, Gonzalez, who was carrying a knife, dashed past the stairway leading a half-flight up to the first family’s living quarters. He then ran into the 80-foot-long East Room, an ornate space often used for receptions or presidential addresses.
I sort of understand the reason for, um, less than accurate public reports here. The Secret Service is a security and intelligence outfit. Intelligence outfits generally conceal their successes, and their failures, and especially how they succeeded and how they failed.
This is the "methods" part of intelligence which spooks always claim is highest-level tippy-toppiest top secret. Letting your enemies know how you respond when probed or attacked gives your enemies far too much information about how to probe or attack you in the future.
I doubt this is a genuine "political" scandal, because I'm thinking Obama's political interests lay with overselling the danger here, not underselling it. I imagine, to the extent he blessed the Secret Service's course of action of underplaying these threats, he did so for reasons of concern about his personal safety and that of his family, and not due to any political advantage.
I imagine the Secret Service will be likely given the "methods" pass on this as well -- they do have, I think, a plausible case to make about why they choose to conceal/downplay attacks which are semi-successful (in that they result in far too deep a penetration for comfort).
However, on this last point, it's useful to point out something about human nature.
When one has a failure -- an embarrassment -- one has personal, selfish reasons to conceal that.
But people are very good about making up stories for their own consumption about how The Greater Good actually requires the same thing that their personal good requires (here, downplaying the incidents and concealing the Secret Service's failure).
And if someone in the Secret Service found these lapses embarrassing, I think it's entirely plausible that such a person might have made a good case to himself that the best course of action was to conceal the embarrassing lapse -- for the sake of the President's security, you understand.
Not out of any grubby desire to hide the embarrassing lapse.
I'm not saying that's what did happen * -- I'm just saying that when personal advantage can be argued to align with ethical imperative, people are very eager to believe such arguments, and convince themselves that they're right.
People tend to be very willing to agree with their own interests. We're all pretty great at that.
That said, I don't expect these stories to go anywhere. The Secret Service does have a facially-plausible reason for downplaying these stories -- "We don't wish to give future attackers an insight into our response and the gaps in our security" -- and that will probably be enough to shut people up.
It's enough to shut me up, personally, and I'm a loudmouth.
I just hope that they're right about that being the actual best course of action, and they're not letting a desire to conceal their mistakes color their judgment.
* Intelligence services are prone to repeated mistakes because they always have an easy out: "Shut up and stop asking questions, because asking questions will compromise security."
But sometimes that sort of mindset precludes the sort of criticism and motivated response required to cure the original defect.
And so sometimes the cover-up results in a new crime -- or a new failure.
I'm sure that most of the time the CIA says "We're not answering that because it would compromise security," that is true, most of the time.
However, I'm equally sure that when the CIA is probed about a lapse in judgment, and it says, again, "We're not answering that because it would compromise security," that is false, a lot of the time.
Hmmm... wheatie has an interesting claim.
I know nothing at all about White House security, except from what I see on 24. (Best way to smuggle a bomb into the White House: recruit the Vice President into your terrorist cabal).
But wheatie says this:
That thing about the doors not being locked?
The doors have traditionally been left unlocked for security reasons!
That's because the Secret Service agents need to be able to have instant access to all areas...in the event of an emergency situation.
So if they are now going to start locking all the doors, it's going to create an impediment to the SS agents.
That kinda makes a whole lot of sense to me.
The real defense against a threat is not a locked door. It's a Secret Service agent.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson: Maybe You Can't Find That Anti-Muslim Quote I Claimed Bush Said in Any So-Called "Newspapers" or "Official Records," But I Cite the Highest Authority Possible for It: Me
That's a parody headline, but that's pretty much what he says:
Ignore the written record. My memory is an Awesome Thing that should not be easily contradicted.
Let's move on to the Bush quote, which is where things get really bad. To Sean’s request that Tyson verify the quote he’s been using against the former president, Tyson notes that September 11th affected him "deeply" and adds:I have explicit memory of those words being spoken by the President. I reacted on the spot, making note for possible later reference in my public discourse. Odd that nobody seems to be able to find the quote anywhere -- surely every word publicly uttered by a President gets logged.
Yes, surely, Doctor Science.
But you say you have an explicit memory! Well my stars and garters, I didn't know you had an explicit memory!
Explicit memories are scientifically proven to be much more reliable than plain ol' memories.
So ignore the evidence -- Take my word for it. I'm a Scientist.
He goes on to say:
FYI: There are two kinds of failures of memory. One is remembering that which has never happened and the other is forgetting that which did. In my case, from life experience, I’m vastly more likely to forget an incident than to remember an incident that never happened. So I assure you, the quote is there somewhere. When you find it, tell me. Then I can offer it to others who have taken as much time as you to explore these things.
I am infallible, so ignore the evidence as documented by thousands of disinterested reporters and transcribers in the government, who write down and publish the president's words every single day.
This is all terribly scientific.
Here's What I Know About Memory: I hate to argue with a Scientist, but what I've gathered from actual science is that "memory" is actually very misconceived. We think of it like the memory of a tape recording or video recording.
It's nothing of the sort. It is certain associations (probably involving some basic keywords, like elemental notions of basic nouns and basic concepts like "direction towards" or "direction away" and "happy" and "scared") networked together in the brain as having been implicated together at one time.
When we "remember," we do not replay a tape of past events in our brain. Instead, what we do is conjure up a new narrative, make a new story for ourselves, from the embedded and networked keywords and associations.
Memory changes over time, as we re-conjure images and experiences. Sometimes new parts get added, and others subtracted.
Sometimes we add new parts that were never part of the actual experience at all and make the "memory" about something that never actually even happened.
Surely Tyson is not so completely ignorant of cognitive science that he thinks an "explicit memory" is infallible...?
Even the way Tyson speaks is anti-scientific.
A long time ago, when I was a kid, I had a very explicit memory that a certain cartoon animal was a certain color.
I actually got in a physical fight with a friend over this animal's color. My friend said the animal was one color; but I had an explicit memory of it being a different color.
He was so stupid with his Wrong Color Naming that I got angry and we got to scrappin'.
A year later I saw the cartoon again.
The animal's color? Precisely the color my friend claimed it to have been.
Precisely not the color I had claimed it to have been.
The problem was that I was remembering part of one cartoon animal -- his type, his name, his basic shape and silhouette -- but then remembering a different cartoon animal's color.
My memory glitched, and put together three correct associations (type, name, shape) with a fourth erroneous association (color).
When did this happen? Why did neurons get crossed here?
Who knows -- maybe one time when I re-conjured the image of the cartoon animal, I forgot the color, and my brain, seeking to fill in the blanks, took the color from another cartoon animal. Having a "void" in the memory bank for color, my brain took its best guess and filled the animal's shape with what seemed a plausible color.
And then, whenever I "remembered" that cartoon animal, I "remembered" the three correct attributes with the one false attribute my brain had conjured up in a pinch.
Anyway, as a six-year-old boy, I learned something about memory that the World's Greatest Scientist Neil DeGrasse Tyson is still ignorant of.
So TV Is Pretty Much Just for Women Now, Right?
Just looking at the new TV shows -- Madame Secretary, How to Get Away With Murder, Forever, etc. -- it seems almost of all of them are pitched chiefly to appeal to women.
Something similar happened in the movies. 16-to-25 year old males bought most movie tickets. So studios started making more and more movies targeting 16-to-25 year old males. This led to people outside of this demographic buying even fewer tickets -- which meant that an even greater fraction of tickets were bought by males 16 to 25, making it more important to make movies for males 16 to 25, and so on.
Well, from what I'm seeing on TV, it appears that women watch more TV than men (at least more scripted shows), so TV is pitching itself harder to harder to women, thus making men even less likely to watch, thus making it even more important to appeal to women, etc.
Something like this already happened with print fiction -- women, I think, were always better readers than men, and furthermore enjoyed fiction more. So publishers bought more female-skewing novels, thus making it less likely men would buy novels.
And so on. You know the breakdown of novel purchases by gender? Women buy 80% of novels; men buy 20%.
This isn't really a complaint so much as an observation.
Back when I was a younger man, I didn't complain that a suspiciously large number of films seemed designed to appeal to me. I just accepted my good fortune.
(Well, I don't know if I should call it "good fortune." For every Die Hard, there were eight Erasers and four Hard Targets.)
Now that I'm older, most movies aren't for me (I'm a little tired of the Talented but Rebellious Young Man Must Accept His Destiny of Being Awesome character arc) and very few novels and apparently no TV shows at all.
The only TV shows "for men" seem to be those designed to appeal to both sexes equally -- dumb reality shows like Survivor, procedurals-mixed-with-personal-drama like Elementary, and general-audience sitcoms like Big Bang Theory.
The only single scripted TV show -- a single fiction -- whose intended audience is primarily male I can think of is Game of Thrones. But that wound up appealing to women, and if I were to guess, I'd say that women probably made up the majority of the audience.
Again, I'm not really complaining. This seems to be explainable by operation of market forces (with the addition of a vicious cycle whereby the smaller part of the audience becomes smaller and smaller still as the industries pitch to the larger potential audience).
It's not a conspiracy, and it's not really even "political."
Still, if we live in a world where each and every "Gender Gap" must be shrieked about and endlessly discussed as "problematic" (and we do live in precisely such a world) -- how about doing a little shrieking for the poor underserved male potential TV audience?
Commenters Point Out Additional Male-Skewing Shows-- mostly on cable channels, and mostly on FX (or FXX, whatever). Archer and Always Sunny are definitely male-appealing; commenters say "The League" is too.
But these are on a fairly minor cable channel, and certainly it doesn't look like new shows are being pitched to the male audience.
(Update: Oops, someone pointed out Adam Baldwin's vehicle (ahem), The Last Ship. Okay, that counts as "new." But still, on TNT.
Okay, you can point out a few male-skewing shows -- but not many.)
#GamerGate Angle: While the Social Justice Warriors complain mightily that video games seem to feature many more male heroes than female ones, and seem skewed to male tastes as a general matter -- I don't hear the Social Justice Warriors crusading for male-skewing fictions in print or on TV.
Seems the SJWs gladly take their advantages where they find them (that is, in entertainments designed to appeal to their gender identity) and then cry an awful lot because one particular entertainment niche (video games) is still skewed towards male tastes.
FBI: Oklahoma Beheading of Woman by Jihadist is Obviously Just a Case of Workplace Violence
I wondered last week if the media would completely cover up this story, as they embargoed the Jihadist Serial Killer in Seattle.
I forgot to ask if the FBI would, too.
They're Now Building... Shipping-Container Apartments
The shipping containers are specced out with interior walls and plumbing and such and then they're just stacked on top of each other to form an apartment complex.
In the sci-fi novel Ready Player One, the very poor protagonist lived in a place called "The Stacks," which were just mobile homes stacked one upon the other (to save space, because of overpopulation and the impossibility of poor folks owning any actual property), then laced together with ramshackle fire escapes.
I thought that was a cute attempt to hyperbolize the drama of the poor, but a dumb one. An interesting image, but there's no way that would happen.
Well, something like that is happening. Shows what I know.