Sponsored Content
« The Morning Rant | Main | South Dakota AG Accused of Lying About Fatal Car Accident Last Year »
February 24, 2021

Michael Anton: Why Do Those Who Claim The Election Wasn't Rigged Require Us to Confirm That Claim For Them?

Why, if this is so obviously a "fact," are some people so insecure about it?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

The purpose of voting today is to give a democratic veneer to an undemocratic regime--not to give the people a say in the direction of their government.

By Michael Anton

February 23, 2021

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan's podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree--which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he insisted I assent to his assertion that the 2020 election was totally on the level. That is to say, I wasn't surprised that Sullivan thinks it was; I was surprised by his evident yearning to hear me say so, too.

Which I could not do.

Sullivan badgered me on this at length before finally accusing me of being fixated on the topic, to which I responded, truthfully, that I was only talking about it because he asked. As far as I’m concerned, the 2020 election is well and truly over. I have, I said, "moved on."

So I thought. Then I received two emails from a friendly acquaintance who is a recognized Republican expert on elections that suggested he, too, is troubled by my lack of belief. Then came two other data points, which I noticed only after the first draft this essay had been completed. Ramesh Ponnuru snarked (snark seems to be the go-to, indeed the only, device his in literary quiver) that one of the anomalies I cited in my most recent article in the Claremont Review of Books had been "debunked" by the partisan left-wing FactCheck.org. While I appreciate the insight into the sources from which National Review editors get their "facts" these days, the quote provided admits that the statistic I cited is, well, accurate. Ponurru naturally ignores all of the other points raised in my earlier article.

Jonathan Chait wrote yet another (his 12th?) article denouncing me, for this same sin of disbelief. Why did he bother? Is there even a remote chance that a single one of his New York magazine readers either read my article or encountered its argument? Or is he worried that the "narrative" of the election is so fragile that it needs to be shored up?

I wanted to move on, I really did. But when Left (Chait), center (Sullivan), faux-right anti-conservative ankle-biter (Ponnuru), and genuine, if establishment, Right (my correspondent) all agree that my lack of belief is a problem, I wondered why this should be so, and the following observations came to mind.

This gets at it:

Or is he worried that the "narrative" of the election is so fragile that it needs to be shored up?

A correspondent who listened to the Andrew Sullivan podcast tells me that Sullivan is so frothingly committed to his fantasies that he sounds legitimately mentally ill.

Andrew Sullivan Freakout Advisory level: Elevated

Remember, this is the same guy that claimed that Sarah Palin was wearing a fake pregnancy suit to cover up the real pregnancy in the family.

But now he's very, very worried about Conspiracy Theories taking root!


digg this
posted by Ace at 12:17 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Soothsayer, the HQ's Most Respected Commenter: " [i]Lauren Southern - never heard of her Posted ..."

Lithiated gp For Healthful Glow: ""ALL the places where massive environmental damage ..."

wth: ""Trans flight attendent dead from suicide after be ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "I guess constantly having to change his Depends ge ..."

Sarcasm: "From Josh Yoder: Southwest Airlines 6013 LAS-CMH d ..."

Joe Mannix (Not a cop!): "... The bill, which Rep. Matsui co-sponsored with ..."

DC Ministry of Disinformation: "Like football? Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at Mar ..."

Formerly Virginian: "Is that the one where the EPA won't allow the envi ..."

Kindltot: "[i]Understand. That's why grocery stores used to h ..."

artisanal ette: "[i]Lauren Chen? Posted by: Soothsayer, the HQ's ..."

SMOD: "“And that’s why I introduced the Algor ..."

Adrienne: "Regarding mandatory meningitis, they're pushing th ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64