Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« In Sudan, A Christian Woman Sentenced to be Hanged for Apostasy | Main | Awesome: A College for Low-Achieving Dummies, St. Thomas of Minnesota, Protests a Camel Petting Zoo for "Hump Day" (Get It?) Because... Camels Can Be Seen as Racist »
May 16, 2014

A Tiny Victory for Free Expression: Brothers Booted by HGTV for Expressing Adherence to Forbidden Bible Permitted To Keep Their Relationship With Their Banker, At Least

Well, in this new age of darkness, that is something. Not much, but something.

The Bentham Brothers' bank, Sun Trust, had decided to end their association with them due to their Forbidden Words about homosexuality. Given that they're businessmen, that's a big thing.

Or I assume this is a big thing. Frankly I don't understand what SunTrust did.

That's people pressuring a bank into basically saying that people don't even have the right to pursue an honest trade if they commit a Speechcraft crime, and the bank agreeing.

But Sun Trust has reversed that decision.

The beginning of this story is so convoluted I can't follow it -- and that convolution probably owes to Sun Trust deliberately convoluting the story of whose decision this was -- but they now say this:

“While we do not publicly comment on specific vendor relationships, we don’t make choices on suppliers nor base business decisions on political factors, nor do we direct our third party vendors to do so.”

“SunTrust supports the rights of all Americans to fully exercise their freedoms granted under the Constitution, including those with respect to free speech and freedom of religion.”

There are conservatives who continue to take the corporatist position that "If a business does it, it's okay."

I'm constantly seeing conservative say idiotic things like "Well, the bank/corporation/NFL/NBA had the right to fire/fine/assign to reeducation camp a person deemed to have committed Speechcraft, so there's no First Amendment implications."

And I'll continue to ask these lunatics: And in what other sphere of human activity to we ever stop the analysis at whether or not an organization or individual has the naked right to do something, without asking further if it is ethical or right-minded to do that thing?

Never, that's when.

Except in the case of corporations canning conservatives for speaking Forbidden Thoughts.

Then thousands of conservatives immediately just say, "Well, the business had to protect itself, didn't it?"

This is insane.

Have any of these Corporate-Rights-Must-Be-Defended-At-All-Costs people sort of noted that corporations are declaring open season on conservative political thought and no other?

I can only guess at the rationale for this: Some people are trying to remain consistent with their past claims that corporations were right to fire people for expressing forbidden progressive thoughts. This attempt at consistency requires them, they think, to bless each fresh corporate purge of a conservative speaker.

Consistency is good. However, if consistency is to be achieved, how about finding that consistency on the other side of the issue?

That is, instead of trying to be consistent by declaring that people can and should be fired for saying virtually anything conservative at all, how about attempting the opposite consistency of declaring that people generally should not be fired for their personal political beliefs?

I just find this insane. Not a week goes by without another business being pressurized by the hard left to fire a conservative, and not a week goes by without a business giving in to the demands of the mob for This Week's Purge.

If people wish to remain consistent, how about just saying "Maybe I was wrong to support this previously, but will support this no longer"?

I just don't get it. It now happens literally every single week, and conservative thought is always the target, and yet conservatives continue to hew to the corporatist line that Whatever's Good For Business Is Good For America.

Anon Y. Mouse Explains What Happens? Here's his explanation:

Ace, I think you have this a bit wrong. It is not that the bank closed the brothers' bank account. Rather, it is the properties that the bank had listed for sale with the brothers. The vendor they used to make the listings pulled all those listings from the brothers real estate business. The vendor told the brothers that the did so because the bank told them to. Now the bank reversed the decision, but placed the blame with the vendor.

Okay don't understand that either.

digg this
posted by Ace at 06:48 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Piper: "293 I thought Progressives hated guns. So, why are ..."

Dr. T: "I don't claim any special expertise in the Baldwin ..."

neverenoughcaffeine: "I smell ozone. Thanks CBD. ..."

CharlieBrown'sDildo: "[i]Posted by: Erebus- ex-killer whale at July 12, ..."

nurse ratched : "I thought Progressives hated guns. So, why are th ..."

Kindltot: "It has gone down to 86, so I will go out and weed ..."

Tuna: "That sounds…lovely. It is hotter than satan& ..."

Piper: " Pickled okra is yummy. Posted by: Tuna at July ..."

Erebus- ex-killer whale: "Here we go. Clint Eastwood pointed all that shit v ..."

Ben Had: "Knee deep straw mixed with alfalfa hay . ..."

Pug Mahon, Nothing to Contribute to the Debate: "In high school I had a good friend who went bad. h ..."

Notorious BFD: "[i]There are certain nics I avoid addressing, or a ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64