Left-Wing UK Government Pushes Forward With Plan to House Over 1,250 "Migrants" Next to a Town With Only 350 Inhabitants

So the "migrants" will outnumber the actual citizens by 3 to 1.

And some are claiming the government is lying, and plans to settle over 3,500 "migrants" in this tiny town.

Wonderful.

Home Office minister Anna Turley has said the government is sticking with plans to accommodate asylum-seekers on former military bases despite protests from local residents.

She told the BBC the government's priority was to ensure asylum-seekers were looked after in a "secure" and "appropriate" place.

That included disused Ministry of Defence properties because they had on-site facilities and were "more contained," she added.

But campaigners in areas earmarked for asylum centres have said small communities with limited infrastructure would not be able to cope with large numbers of people.

There have been protests in Piddington, Oxfordshire, over plans to house more than 1,000 asylum seekers at a site near the village.

That's a lie. They intend to settle 3,150 "migrants" there.

Hope you enjoy gang rape, women of Piddington!

Mike Nixon, the vice-chairman of Piddington Parish Council, said there was a "huge amount of concern and worry" among residents and that an asylum centre would have a "dramatic effect" on the way they lived their lives.

The proposal has prompted Piddington to hold a symbolic independence referendum, asking its 400 or so residents if they want to remain part of the UK.

Nixon said: "We're still very frustrated. Andy Burnham did say that he's willing to listen, but we've had no formal contact. No consultation, nothing from the Home Office.

"We felt that the only way of making our views felt was to say 'well if we're not going to be listened to, what's the point of being a part of the country?'"

A representative from Reform says this talk of 1,250 "migrants" is another leftwing lie.

The real number planned, he says, is more than 3,500.

Which would give "migrants" a 10-to-1 advantage over the invaded natives.

Reform UK's Zia Yusuf has blasted "lying Labour" after it emerged the Home Office had carried out assessments for migrants at a former MoD site, which would have outnumbered villagers 10 to one. Publicly available documents show an Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) risk assessment stating that "the proposed scheme" relates to "accommodation for 3,510 service users" at the ex-military Bicester Site A storage facility.

The Home Office denies this, but admits... well, maybe there was a prior plan to settle 3,510 migrants next to this town of 350, but we assure you, that plan is no longer operative and we surely won't make it operative in the future.

The shocking figure discovered by worried villagers of neighbouring Piddington, in Oxfordshire, has been refuted by the Home Office, which said it was based on an "outdated estimate" and there was no plan to increase the official figure of 1,256 male migrants they were seeking to put in the base.

Uh-huh.

But you give me your word you won't c*** in my mouth, right?

All right, so long as you promised.

A former "Conservative" MP says that the government should address the sexual needs of these 1,250+ male migrants by commissioning a brothel for them, but won't.

Lord Bebo @MyLordBebo

Aug 14
🇬🇧‼️🚨 BROTHEL TO SAVE A VILLAGE?

The UK government wants to put 1250 single male migrants into a facility that borders a small village with 350 people.

Piddington has a small population with 65% being women or children. So for every woman and kid, 9 single male migrants will be there.

Now everyone ask the question "what will the men do?" And they cynically demand a "brothel" so the villagers will be safe.

Kinda crazy that everyone knows it's a bad idea.

So the suggested safety concept is to give the asylum seekers prostitutes so they don't hurt the villagers? That by itself is a crazy place to be.

Also that means, Brits pay their taxes so refugees can be housed and then British taxes would pay for prostitutes for these men ... work hard folks, the prostitutes need their money.

That's a good point at the end -- these poor migrants won't be able to pay the government-provided prostitutes. The taxpayers will have to pay for the migrants' sexual gratification, to keep a lid on rapes.

Such a Tory solution. I think she means this as an attack on the settlement plans, but I'm not sure, because the Tories opened the floodgates for immigration after promising to reduce it.

Does no one grasp that by letting in tens and tens of thousands of single (military-aged) men -- many of whom are criminals fleeing their home countries due to rape and murder charges -- you're severely straining the social fabric and guaranteeing, and accepting, hundreds of additional rapes per year?

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 04:26 PM

| Access Comments