Surprise! The Mind-Controlling Media Cult That Brought You Biden's Cheapfake "Presidency" Is Now Claiming That Videos Showing Arson and Violence in LA Are Also Cheapfakes

They literally never stop lying.

The New York Times says that if you're claiming that Democrats permit and encourage their street paramilitaries to commit violence to terrorize the population into supporting the Democrat agenda, you're pushing "conspiracy theories."

Disgraceful propaganda to push the Marxist revolutionary line:

Misleading photographs, videos and text have spread widely on social media as protests against immigrant raids have unfolded in Los Angeles, rehashing old conspiracy theories and expressing support for President Trump's actions.

Oh no, not that.

The flood of falsehoods online appeared intended to stoke outrage toward immigrants and political leaders, principally Democrats.

It's a conspiracy theory to say that Democrats justify and excuse violence and chaos to advance their agenda, says a Democrat propaganda rag justifying and excusing violence and chaos to advance their agenda.

They also added to the confusion over what exactly was happening on the streets, which was portrayed in digital and social media through starkly divergent ideological lenses. Many posts created the false impression that the entire city was engulfed in violence, when the clashes were limited to only a small part.

Literally no one thought "the entire city was engulfed in violence." In no riots is the entire city engulfed in violence.

They're falsely claiming that conservatives are stupid and believe stupid things to make the case that we're wrong about the fact that the city was essentially paralyzed by violence. I mean, they shut down one of LA's most important highways, the 101.

There were numerous scenes of protesters throwing rocks or other objects at law enforcement officers and setting cars ablaze, including a number of self-driving Waymo taxis. At the same time, false images spread to revive old conspiracies that the protests were a planned provocation, not a spontaneous response to the immigration raids.

You mean like the California Democrat assemblyman who posted TikToks telling people that "something is going to happen" at the ICE detention center, not-so-subtly encouraging Democrat terrorists to make that something happen?

The confrontation escalated on Monday as new protests occurred and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced -- on X -- that he was mobilizing 700 Marines from a base near Los Angeles to guard federal buildings. They are expected to join 2,000 members of the California National Guard whom Mr. Trump ordered deployed without the authorization of the state's governor, Gavin Newsom, who normally has command of the troops.

The latest deployments prompted a new wave of misleading images to spread -- some purporting to show Marines and the military service's weapons in action. One was a still from "Blue Thunder," a 1983 action-thriller about a conspiracy to deprive residents of Los Angeles of their civil rights. It features a climactic dogfight over the city's downtown.

Someone posted a meme of a sci-fi helicopter doing loop-de-loops and killing Malcolm McDowell and the New York Times is taking this as "disinformation" that proves that we're all spreading "conspiracy theories."

Darren L. Linvill, a researcher at Clemson University's Media Forensics Hub, said conservatives online were "building up the riots in a performative way "to help bolster Mr. Trump's claims that Los Angeles had been taken over by "violent, insurrectionist mobs."

Note that this argument is merely "conservatives are playing this story more heavily that liberals are." No shit. Liberals always hide stories about liberals acting badly.

This is not exposing a conspiracy theory -- this is just the New York Times whining that conservatives won't go along with their cultish erasure of history to fit the Democrat-Media Party narrative.

This is just the New York Times whining girlishly that conservatives won't believe them that the newest outbreak of Democrat-cultivated ultraviolence is No Big Deal, Brah.

Dr. Linvill said the posts were also "a bit self-fulfilling." "As they direct attention to it," he said, "more protesters will show up."

Of course. Perfect. "Akshually it's conservatives who are causing the riots by talking about the riots."

Thanks for putting us straight, New York Times.

Brian Stelter is again pushing that Democrat riots are just "cries for help."

Also, he insists that it's disinformation to post videos from a couple of hours ago, because.... Well, the fires might have gone out by now. So all videos of the fire are disinformation.

Weird, the media continues playing video from January 6th to this day. But this fat, bloated propagandist is claiming that it's against the rules of journalism to post any videos that aren't showing live events.

Obviously Maxine Waters endorses the Democrat-Media Party effort to convince people that their eyes are lying to them:

The media just got done telling us all that our eyes were lying to us when we watched "cheapfake" videos of Joe Biden tripping and falling and summoning ghosts, and they're back to doing it.

posted by Ace at 02:23 PM

| Access Comments