Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Saturday Afternoon Chess thread 11-28-2020 | Main | Saturday Overnight Open Thread (11/28/20)
November 28, 2020

Science isn't dead, but it is ailing - part 4 [Jay Guevara]


Is it obvious? YES! It IS obvious!

Previous installments:

Science isn't dead, but it is ailing - part 3
Science isn't dead, but it is ailing - part 2
Science isn't dead, but it is ailing - part 1

In the most recent installment I was ripping on chemistry instruction, which God knows deserves it. This time I'm going to rip on mathematics instruction, which really deserves it, in my opinion.* There are good textbooks and lecturers out there, but they're kind of finding patriotic Democrats.

Just as in chemistry instruction, the problem arises from intellectual pretension. Now you would think that impressing teenagers that you know more about a subject than they do would be rather pathetic, and you'd be right, but many succumb to the urge to do so.

Pretension takes the form of math instructors and their textbooks making a fetish of "rigor." This is bogus for a variety of reasons. First, it's pedagogically unsound; students don't give a rip about rigor, they're just trying to understand the underlying concept. The only person in the room who gives a toss about rigor is the instructor, i.e., the least important person in the room.

Second, historically most mathematics was devised to solve practical problems. "Geometry" literally means "measurement of the earth." Trigonometry literally means "measurement of triangles." Making such practical treatments rigorous oftentimes only took place well after the event. Even great mathematicians sometimes whiffed badly on what today is considered straightforward material. For example, no less a mathematician than Friedrich Gauss - one of the best in human history - famously thought that the infinite series formed from (-1)n converged. C'mon, Fred, just add up a half dozen terms and then tell us that the sum is going to converge!

A more sound approach pedagogically, I believe, is to follow the historical development and introduce concepts on an intuitive basis that is easily grasped on a visceral level, and then clean up with rigorous reasoning later. Key to this approach is to interweave the algebraic picture with the geometric one (i.e., a pictorial one), which being visual is typically much more accessible intuitively.

As a simple example, if you ask someone to define the tangent, 99.9% (including me, until quite recently) will tell you it's the quotient of the sine and the cosine, i.e., they'll approach this from an algebraic perspective. But that's is not the definition; that's a consequence of the definition. And why is it called the tangent, anyway? Shifting to the geometric (that is, pictorial) perspective makes the answer obvious. To spare the Horde the math, I've broken this out into a PDF.

The point is that weaving between geometric and algebraic approaches is very powerful, and very efficient in conveying concepts on a visceral level. Yet math instructors typically eschew the geometric approach in favor of the oftentimes more obscure algebraic approach, and in pursuit of "rigor." And that is a pity. They fail to grasp that they - and what they want - are less important than the student, and what he wants. After all, the whole exercise is for the student.

*Curiously, physics texts, in my limited experience, do not suffer from this problem. I had Halliday and Resnick (quill pen edition) and the Berkeley physics course, and both texts were superb, and began at the beginning. What a concept!

digg this
posted by Open Blogger at 07:45 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Epobirs: "Speaking of guitar purchases, Doc Hammer, half of ..."

Miklos suggests: "On the downside, Monday, and I have an errand to r ..."

Divide by Zero [/i]: " 95% of Venezuelans vote to steal land from neigh ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "The Killer Kittens are thriving. Stirling slept o ..."

Noah Bawdy: "I am locked out of almost everything. These peopl ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "Morning, all you insomaniacals! Woke up about an ..."

Farmer: "Neither of them felt comfortable driving in snow, ..."

Mainah: "Want To Be Happy? Care only about the opinions of ..."

Puddleglum, Christmasing in Pennsyltucky: "Well, let me try to sleep again. Maybe nap. Start ..."

Puddleglum, Christmasing in Pennsyltucky: "[i]348 And now for something completely different ..."

Ciampino - All you knead is loaf: "How Boris Johnson asked spies to plan a military r ..."

Ciampino - That upholstery guy that got shot? Fully recovered now: "And now for something completely different ...... ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64