Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Polk County, Florida Sheriff to Antifa Terrorist Raiders Thinking About Coming to Pillage: We're All Armed Here and We Will Kill You Dead If You Come | Main | Monday Overnight Open Thread (6/1/20)
June 01, 2020

RedState Legal Analyst "Shipwreckedcrew:" Emmit Sullivan's Response to the Court of Appeals Is Deranged, Doesn't Cite Any Authority for His Actions, Just Tells Them To Let Him Do Whatever He Wants

Emmet Sullivan has submitted the reply he used taxpayer funds to pay a high-price lawyer to write for him. You can read it here.

I'm sure the Twitter Circle-Jerk of Experts will tell us what a tremendous piece of lawyering Sullivan has submitted.

Making my way through the Sullivan filing.

30,000 Foot Observation and why I think this is not a serious effort to prevail:

1. The Cir. Ct. did not ask for an explanation from Sullivan because they were intrigued by his approach and the just wanted to know more about it.

That is: the Circuit Court was not asking him, "Hey, buddy, this is interesting, can you tell us more?!"


As we'll see, Sullivan decided he couldn't defend his actions and so decided to ignore the orders of the court.

2. The question they asked him to address was pointed, and their reference to Fokker [which recently held that Sullivan had no discretion in this situation but to dismiss] told him where he should focus his attention.

3. But what he has done is basically said "Regardless of what Fokker says in terms of limiting my discretion, I've got a plan and you folks in the Cir. Ct need to just stay out of the way until I'm done. And he tells them all about his big plan and why he's in this position."

Obviously, that's a paraphrase, but even the lawyerly-sounding version of that will not sound good. It will sound like an act of contempt by a judge against the Circuit Court that is his boss.

4. If the Cir. Ct. was just intrigued and was simply expressing its curiosity about what he had in mind when it issued its Order to him, then his response might elicit a response along the lines of "Great -- can't wait to see what comes from your plan."

5) But given their "inquiry", the more likely response to exactly what Sullivan has set forth is "That's what we were afraid of, and we're not interested in what that kind plan might turn up because there's no legal basis for you to do what you propose to do.

Sullivan looks like John Forbes Nash from "A Beautiful Mind" who just can't help by continue to try to convince people in his life that the figments of his imagination are real, and if he just explains it with more earnestness they'll come around and see what he sees.

"Shipwreckedcrew" also claims that Emmet Sullivan has included a falsehood in his reply:

I'm going to resist the urge to blast out on the Sullivan filing in the Flynn case.

But I would note that Beth Wilkinson made a bald face false statement on Page 1 where she says Judge Sullivan found Flynn's statement to be material.

Among the final comments he made at the Dec. 18 hearing was for the attorneys to prepare before the next hearing to answer his questions about "how" the statements were material, because he still didn't understand that issue.

For him to say "I found them material" while having said "I don't understand how they are material" is judicial misconduct -- no way around it. He can't make a determination on a factual element of a criminal offense and profess to not understand what he's just done.

Yes, he never did schedule that hearing, and he never ruled about it. This is either a lie, or complete stupidity from an obviously-unqualified "judge."

I skimmed the reply myself -- shipwreckedcrew is right about Sullivan just saying "Splunge" to the court's actual question. He basically just asks a series of rhetorical questions -- which frankiy, do sound like those of a raving paranoid -- and postualtes that only his Freelance Sleuthing can get to the bottom of this mystery. And in response to the court's question, "Where the fuck do you think you get this power from?," he seriously answers, "The court (you) will really really find my Investigations into this Nefarious Scheme helpful, so let me do what I do."

Among the questions this lunatic incompetent keeps asking is Why did Flynn swear under oath he committed the crime when I asked him if he did?

He knows the answer, but he prefers to leave it a mystery so that the rhetorical question suggests something insidious.

The actual answer is, "Michael Flynn said he had committed the crime of making a false statement when you demanded he do so, immediately after threatening him with a count of treason."

Something this lunatic incompetent had to later apologize for.

But he really wants to know why Flynn reversed himself on his decision to withdraw his guilty plea and instead reaffirm it? Becuase you threatened to put him in jail for treason if he exercised his right to withdraw the plea.

This isn't a mystery, you arrogant, useless check-that-box know-nothing.

This is not going to work. This seems, as someone said, like a "last will and testament" -- when this lunatic incompetent is slapped around and slapped down, he'll point to this daffy filing and say, "See? My personal creation of the Emmett Sullivan Detective Agency would have gotten to the truth, so They couldn't allow it."

What the fuck ever, cretin. YOLO, you stupid, incompetent diversity-slot motherfucker.

Update: UndercoverHuber's repsonses to the ravings of this lunatic incompetent are worth reading.

digg this
posted by Ace at 08:31 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Thomas Bender: "There are two morals to the story... Moral 1: W ..."

Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ [b]This[/b] year in Corsicana - [i]again[/i]! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i]But the people holding his strings aren't stupi ..."

JackStraw: ">>That is my fear as well. The Idiots In Charge do ..."

Anna Puma: "Joey didn't promise enough bomb belts in each cook ..."

Commissar Hrothgar (hOUT3) ~ [b]This[/b] year in Corsicana - [i]again[/i]! ~ [/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i]But I fear bigger things are coming. The number ..."

JackStraw: ">>JackStraw @ 294- What level of hell do these t ..."

NaCly Dog: "Have a great night, everyone. May you all thriv ..."

Alizarin Crimson: "80,000 miles are worth about $1400. Do the mat ..."

[/i][/b]andycanuck (2yu8s)[/s][/u]: "There's no such thing as a Biden rally... Posted ..."

NaCly Dog: "Anna Puma That would be a great Rant. Wedding ..."

Angzarr the Cromulent: "That Babylon Bee story about Mr. P. and Mr. Z. at ..."

mnw: ""Uncommitted" is getting 15% in the MI DEM primary ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64