PETA's Stupid New Publicity Stunt

I'm only posting this because it has hot chicks in lingerie having sex with vegetables. Or at least foreplay with them.

Of course, PETA submitted this ad to run in the Super Bowl, knowing they'd be rejected, and then would 1) not have to pay for the ad but 2) get lots of free media for their "rejected too-hot-for-tv ad."

It's so fucking childish. I guess I can't beat up on PETA because this sort of deliberate tween-aged shock value stunt always works. At least as far as getting the never-intended-for-airing ad on the local news.

On the other hand, I can beat up on the media for always rewarding this stupidity. The media will jump at any opportunity, under the guise of "controversy" or "newsworthiness," to run stories about 1) celebrites or 2) sex.

Want to bring attention to your cause? Accuse some celebrity or movie or tv show of being "insensitive," somehow.

Is no one being insensitive? No problem; cut an ad with hot chicks giving hand-jays to arugala.

Would it work for the GOP? Maybe we should start cutting ads like this. Like Jim DeMint being chased, Beatles-like, by topless busty women, because his economic ideas are so hhhhottt.

Not Safe For Work. Semi-naked women and strong vegetable-oriented sexual suggestion.

posted by Ace at 04:06 PM

| Access Comments