Democrat Activists Urge Hillary Clinton to Challenge Vote, Claiming Statistical Vote Anomalies

"Experts" on the left -- remember, the left has experts, the right has activists and conservatives -- say they have very tentative and sketchy suggestions of vote hacking.

Hillary Clinton is being urged by prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they've found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.

Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000.

It should be stressed that these idiots are saying they don't believe the machines were hacked--and that the "most likely" reason Trump won the election is that Trump won the election.

Were this year's deviations from pre-election polls the results of a cyberattack? Probably not. I believe the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked...

I'm old enough to remember when "systematic efforts to delegitimized a duly elected president" were deemed "racist."

That was two months ago.

Life comes at you fast, huh?

posted by Ace at 02:33 PM

| Access Comments