Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Brian Fellowes (that's what I'll call him) keeps claiming that there's no difference between keeping the emails she decided to retain on a thumb drive, as opposed to the original server.
He says there's no "relevance" to this.
That of course is what they call in legal circles a "Huge Lie."
Because on the server itself -- if you had not wiped it -- you could see traces of what had been deleted, and where. For example, if Hillary altered an email before transferring it to her thumb drive, or clipped out a couple of emails in a chain conversation, you could see that immediately from the server. You might not be able to read the deleted emails, but you'd definitely see where an alteration/deletion had occurred.
But Hillary didn't want people to see that. So she wiped the server.
And Brian Fellowes says, "I don't know what 'wiped' means."