Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
NoVaMoMe 2023: 06/10/2023
Details to follow

« Hillary: I'm Not "Truly Well Off" | Main | Did Koskinen Actively Mislead Congress? »
June 23, 2014

Supreme Court Slightly Limits EPA's Power to Regulate Greenhouse Gases, While Reaffirming Its Power to Do So Generally

This story is being reported three different ways:

Fox News highlights the "good news" for conservatives, reporting that the Supreme Court dealt the EPA a setback.

The liberal LA Times highlights the good news for liberals: Supreme Court upholds rules curbing greenhouse gases from power plants.

Many outlet report it as a mixed bag, which it is. In fact, the LA Times might be slightly closer to right than Fox -- the Supreme Court's limits here seem pretty minor, even as they reaffirm that the EPA can regulate greenhouse gases even in absence of statutory authority.

By 7-2, the Court upheld the EPA's general self-asserted right to regulate carbon dioxide by entities already covered as "major polluters" in other areas (that is, with regard to other pollutants already named in Congressional law as actually within the EPA's ambit to regulate).

The major polluters are usually power plants.

By 5-4, the conservatives on the Court knocked down the EPA's attempt to "stretch" their grant of power to force anyone expanding their industrial operations to also employ the best available means for combatting "global warming."

Under the EPA's fanciful reading of the law, they could have also required basically anyone engaging in economic activity at all -- adding a new wing to a factory, say -- to undergo the EPA's onerous greenhouse-gas mitigation process.

This may seem like good news -- I suppose it is -- but it's barely good news. Scalia continues joining Roberts and Kennedy to reaffirm previous rulings that the EPA can regulate greenhouse gases, even though Congress never authorized that.

Yet Scalia also claims -- in the part of the decision limiting the EPA -- that it is an elemental principle of administrative agency law that an agency cannot grant itself more power than Congress has granted it.

Only Thomas and Alito voted to sustain all of the challenges to the EPA.

According to the 5-4 majority opinion penned by Scalia, the EPA is getting almost everything it wants:

EPA is getting almost everything it wanted in this case," Scalia said. He said the agency wanted to regulate 86 percent of all greenhouse gases emitted from plants nationwide, and it will it be able to regulate 83 percent of the emissions under the ruling. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas said they would go farther and bar all regulation of greenhouse gases under the permitting program.

So Scalia says the EPA can't grab that 3% of made-up authority -- extending its authority from 83% to 86% -- but the first 83% was fine, a freebie.

digg this
posted by Ace at 03:24 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Skip : "Every dug commercial on TV or radio has list of po ..."

Skip : "Like every freaking day. Starting at very close jo ..."

Lost In Space: "hhh, also known as the 5 Point.. Been there. Can't ..."

nurse ratched : "Lucy's snores are mocking me. ..."

JT: "Wasn't supposed to be up until well after 4am Pos ..."

nurse ratched : "Ahhh, also known as the 5 Point. Been there. ..."

Skip : "Wasn't supposed to be up until well after 4am ..."

Lost In Space: "Mecca Cafe. Posted by: Lost In Space Is that a ..."

JEM: "I live with periodic insomnia. I get to think thr ..."

JT: "I just TOLD ya the status ! Dark. And it wil ..."

Debby Doberman Schultz: "Hiya right back at you, JT, I was just kidding, ki ..."

JT: " What am I chopped liver, JT?? Posted by: Debby D ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64