Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
This is required by the Online Safety Act which ostensibly was created to prevent children from seeing porn. It's obviously complete bullshit because there is no porn on Wikipedia, and the moderators aren't children.
A friend who plays better chess than me - and knows more math & CS than me - said that he played some moves against a newly released LLM, and it must be at least as good as him. I said, no way, I'm going to cRRRush it, in my best Russian accent. I make a few moves - but unlike him, I don't make good moves, which would be opening book moves it has seen a million times; I make weak moves, which it hasn't. The thing makes decent moves in response, with cheerful commentary about how we're attacking this and developing that - until about move 10, when it tries to move a knight which isn't there, and loses in a few more moves. This was a year or two ago; I've just tried this again, and it lost track of the board state by move 9.
This aligns with recent posts of leading AI tools losing chess matches to an Atari 2600.
The Atari doesn't know much, but it does encode the rules of chess. The LLMs... Don't.