Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Monday Morning News Dump | Main | America's Iraq Bet Goes Bust »
June 16, 2014

Supreme Court Decision Day

The Supreme Court released decisions moments ago in Abramski v. United States and Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus.

The Abramski case raised the issue of whether Congress criminalized firearm straw purchases by means of a material statements law. Justice Kagan, writing for the liberal wing of the Court, plus Justice Kennedy, found that the "context" of the statute suggested that Congress did indeed intend to criminalize straw purchases.

The overarching reason is that Abramski’s reading would undermine—indeed, for all important purposes, would virtually repeal—the gun law’s core provisions. As noted earlier, the statute establishes an elaborate system to verify a would-be gun purchaser’s identity and check on his background. It also requires that the information so gathered go into a dealer’s permanent records. The twin goals of this comprehensive scheme are to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and others who should not have them, and to assist law enforcement authorities in investigating serious crimes. And no part of that scheme would work if the statute turned a blind eye to straw purchases—if, in other words, the law addressed not the substance of a transaction, but only empty formalities.

(Internal citations omitted). Justice Scalia writes the dissent, which argues that if Congress wanted to ban straw purchases, it should have said so.

The majority’s purpose-based arguments describe a statute Congress reasonably might have written, but not the statute it wrote.

BTW, this decision does not bode well for the Obamacare subsidies cases now-pending before the lower courts. If the Court will let prosecutors add to the gun laws because of "context," it will probably let HHS and Treasury add to Obamacare for the same reason.

You can read the decision here (PDF).

The SBA List decision is more favorable. In a unanimous decision written by Justice Thomas, the Court held that SBA List has standing to challenge the Ohio election speech ban. This was the rare case where the conservative justices, who generally disapprove expanding standing, agreed with the liberal wing that SBA List deserved its day in court.

You can read the SBA List decision here (pdf).

For the remaining Supreme Court cases this term, check out my guide over at the Federalist.


digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 10:30 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Skip : "Tech can be anywhere from 4 -4:45 ..."

Skip : "Blew timer for coffee, I think by my last comment ..."

Rod Porkmore: "Pixy hates us. ..."

Skip : "Wonder if just lost control of car or other reason ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "Yeah: Even at 9 am on a Sunday, the bridge is full ..."

Roaming Talks: "Can I simply say what a comfort to find someone wh ..."

führerschein machen in polen: "Appreciating the time and effort you put into your ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "On my way to Aldi yesterday, I noted that the brid ..."

Skip : "Have to leave in about a hour, long commute again ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "Morning, insomaniacals! I'm on a mission to wake ..."

RickZ: "[i]I really believe that the Meak SHALL inherit th ..."

Colin: "Win or loose, I assume Kamala will be person of th ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64