Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Ace Of Spades HQ Decision Desk: Announcement Regarding North Carolina | Main | You Know Those 626,000 Republicans Who Turned Out in Wisconsin Yesterday? Go Higher. A LOT Higher. »
May 09, 2012

Liberal Conventional Wisdom Starting to Twig On To AoSHQ Conventional Wisdom-- Obama Is an Underdog

When Harold MacMillan was asked what he most feared might derail his government, he famously, possibly apocryphally, said "Events, dear boy, events."

Although campaigns and candidate quality (personality, charisma, authority) do matter, events -- actual facts -- matter a great deal more.

Obama has bad facts, bad events. The only truly good event was capping bin Ladin, but bin Ladin had been isolated and cut off from Al Qaeda's actual governing leadership for years and years, thanks to Bush's manhunt for him. A good thing, true, but bin Ladin was in semi-retirement, watching porn all day in his squalid, dirty compound.

And on the other side of the ledger, the bad facts? Just about everything else.

Via the Captain, a liberal starts imagining the unimaginable.

The three most recent national polls—Democracy Corps (D), Gallup/USA Today, and the Politico/George Washington University Battleground Poll—underscore how tough a reelection campaign Obama faces and why it’s fair to call him an underdog at this point. He’s stuck at 47 percent against Mitt Romney in all three surveys, with the small slice of undecided voters tilting against the president. His job approval ranges from 45 percent (Democracy Corps) to 48 percent (Battleground). Those numbers are hardly devastating, but given today’s polarized electorate, they’re not encouraging either.

Obama’s scores on the economy are worsening, even as voters still have mixed feelings on who’s to blame. In the Battleground survey, nearly as many voters now blame Obama for the state of the economy (39 percent) as those who don’t think it’s his fault (40 percent). In both the Battleground and Democracy Corps polls, 33 percent said the country is on the right track, with 59 percent saying it’s on the wrong track—numbers awfully similar to the state of play right before the 2010 Republican landslide. These are several leading indicators that suggest the trajectory could well get worse for the president as the election nears.

And speaking of events -- there are, of course, a lot of unknowns lurking out there, ready to become known at any moment; and one strains one's imagination trying to think of unknowns which could suddenly spring up which help Barack Obama.

Whereas one has little difficulty thinking of Sudden Events which would damage him further -- France and Greece, for example, imploding, while following policies which seem an awful lot closer to Obama's program than to Mitt Romney's.

And why even go abroad searching for monsters? What if California or Illinois melts down? What if they default, and/or their bonds stop selling?

The economy seems unlikely to improve dramatically -- indeed, it seems softening, worsening, deteriorating. It seems far more likely that, if the economy were to suddenly move from a slowly-degrading flatline, it would deteriorate precipitously, rather than suddenly improve markedly.

A sudden 6% jump in GDP would help Obama... but that seems less likely than a -2% double dip of the recession. Neither are very likely at the moment, but the former seems fanciful while the latter seems like a genuine possibility.

Even to the extent that election campaigns matter -- Is Obama's campaign a strong one?

The [$25 million ad campaign talking up an improving economy and job growth] is itself is in search of a cohesive message. The first part underscores how severe the recession was, as a preemptive defense for why the economy hasn’t turned around faster. The second half argues that America is “coming back,” thanks to job growth over the past year. It’s that part that will prove to be a tough sell. Indeed, it was top Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg who advised the campaign in February that this is the type of message -- saying things are getting better when voters don’t agree -- that polls miserably “and produces disastrous results.”

But Obama’s campaign officials can’t utilize the time-tested “are you better than you were four years ago” message because it doesn’t ring true, so they have to argue things are getting a little better and the administration needs more time. It shows how limited the Obama playbook is this time around—mobilize the base, lambaste the opposition, and hope enough independents will hold their nose and vote for you.

Obama's ads must, due to facts, remain a muddle -- it's bad, but it's getting better, not quite as bad as it could be. We must do better, because we cannot be satisfied with the horrible economy as it is, but who knows, it could be worse.

And Romney's ads? Romney's ads will show no such nuance -- they will paint the economy as the worst economy since the Great Depression. A message which has the benefits of being arresting, dramatic, easily conveyed, lacking in complication and nuance, and true.

Look at this, just one of many:

By the way, Romney's had harder-hitting ads than that in this past year. And the Republican Governors' Association cranks out the best, horror-movie-trailer ads I've ever seen, and they can be expected to put out some doozies this year.

Remember the "Remember November" ads?

They'll be turned to 11 this year. (And I suggest Romney borrow some of the cinematic techniques the RGA is employing.)

What's Obama's response to that going to be? That Romney is wallowing in unpatriotic negativism?

Yeah, that claim, that an opponent is being "unpatriotic" and "betting against America" when he points out "negative" economic realities just doesn't sell. I've seen people try that for years.

What it really sounds like is "Please stop saying that, it is absolutely catastrophic for my campaign fortunes."

Back over at the Hot Air link, James Carville warns liberals that they have to get out of the liberal cocoon and "WTFU," or Wake The F*** Up.


digg this
posted by Ace at 04:16 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
LizLem: "Who are people watching or tuning into election ev ..."

Anna Puma: "I sincerely hope Helene turned many electronic vot ..."

L - If they'll do it with you, they'll do it to you, too : "Government modeling from antifa, BLM, and their mo ..."

L - If they'll do it with you, they'll do it to you, too : "And Joe, who signed what was clearly prepared befo ..."

L - If they'll do it with you, they'll do it to you, too : "Good morning, all, and thank you, J.J. Jimmy ga ..."

Skip : "#21 Again IMO, my vote like any others matters not ..."

It's me donna : "The reports of a Nood are only premature. OL ..."

Smell the Glove: "Premature noodulation ..."

18-1: "I just saw the Kamala border czar song...its great ..."

ShainS -- Assassination is The Ultimate Form of Censorship [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "This is especially funny, because the regime media ..."

rickb223 Gold & Silver Spot Prices [s][/b][/i][/u]: "The word means "female warrior" in Latin. I don't ..."

Divide by Zero [/i]: " The reports of a Nood are only premature. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64