Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Kirsten Powers: I'm Beginning to Suspect The Media Has a Double-Standard About Crass Comments About Women
"This isn't really about misogyny; this is about the Democratic Party. And that's what it always comes down to, it's a proxy war for the Democratic Party."
But if Limbaugh’s actions demand a boycott—and they do—then what about the army of swine on the left?
During the 2008 election Ed Schultz said on his radio show that Sarah Palin set off a “bimbo alert.” He called Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut.” (He later apologized.) He once even took to his blog to call yours truly a “bimbo” for the offense of quoting him accurately in a New York Post column.
Keith Olbermann has said that conservative commentator S.E. Cupp should have been aborted by her parents, apparently because he finds her having opinions offensive. He called Michelle Malkin a “mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick.” He found it newsworthy to discuss Carrie Prejean’s breasts on his MSNBC show...
The grand pooh-bah of media misogyny is without a doubt Bill Maher.
Left-wing darling Matt Taibbi wrote on his blog in 2009, “When I read [Malkin’s] stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy set of balls in her mouth.”
She makes a great point about Maher. Maher claims the reason he's allowed to call Palin a twat, c**t and so forth is that "he doesn't have sponsors."
No, he has a patron in HBO -- and HBO suffers him. HBO is a corporation; shouldn't they drop him?
But that's not Powers' point. Powers makes the point that while he may not have sponsors, he has a lot of top-liberal guests, without whom his show would consist of his own, ahem, comedic talent.
Why do they continue to flock to him? And giggle over his crassest comments?
Now, as I said about Limbaugh, I think many of these things are less egregious due to their being jokes of some kind.