« Top Headline Comments 01-12-09 | Main | Joe the War Correspondent »
January 12, 2009

Feministing "Community:" Just Say No to... Reproduction

Sounds like a plan.

Along with the emancipation of women, sexual liberation has become very much a part of politics around the world. To the conservatives, both these issues challenge ‘family values’.

But what if there were no families? What if we say no to reproduction?

My understanding of reproduction is that it is the basis of the institutions of marriage and family, and those two provide the moorings to the structure of gender and sexual oppression. Family is the social institution that ensures unpaid reproductive and domestic labour, and is concerned with initiating a new generation into the gendered (as I analyzed here) and classed social set-up. Not only that, families prevent money the flow of money from the rich to the poor: wealth accumulates in a few hands to be squandered on and bequeathed to the next generation, and that makes families as economic units selfishly pursue their own interests and become especially prone to consumerism.

So it makes sense to say that if the world has to change, reproduction has to go. Of course there is an ecological responsibility to reduce the human population, or even end it , and a lot was said about that on the blogosphere recently (here, and here), but an ecological consciousness is not how I came to my decision to remain child-free.

Because reproduction is seen as a psychological need, even a biological impulse, that would supposedly override any rational concerns arising out of a sense of responsibility, ecological or otherwise, I would like to propose emotional conditioning to counter such a need or impulse to reproduce. Using my own life as a case study, I conclude that I came to a resolve not to reproduce through largely unconscious emotional reactions . I like children, but every time I fantasized of having one, I felt pangs of guilt over how for this 'impulse' of mine, someone else would have to put their body on the line.

David Thompson terms this as another proposal in the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEM).

The personal is not political, and it's solipsistic, nevermind stupid, for this woman to extend her personal choices into some kind of universal political movement.

The Intolerance of Tolerance: Liberals are determined to always think not merely well of themselves, but to think the absolute best of themselves. It's very hard, for example, to get a liberal to admit that any political choices they make are rooted in mere selfishness, that is, that the policy they propose would benefit themselves. They always claim some higher purpose, some disinterested reason for their political beliefs.

Now, it's not easy to get anyone to admit selfish motives, but it sure is easier to get a conservative to admit them. Sure, a conservative tends not to offer "personal selfishness" as his first rationale to oppose higher taxes -- there are plenty of disinterested, non-selfish reasons to offer -- but eventually, down on the list, if pressed, a conservative will say "Even if all you say is true, I want to keep my money, because it's my money. There are good reasons apart from this to oppose the government forcibly exacting more money from me, but even if they all fail, I want to keep my money."

This is practically an impossible admission to ever extract from a liberal.

Another example: Liberals who are not ideological atheists, but who are also not religious, will not admit that someone who goes to church every Sunday and believes passionately in God might be more "spiritual" than they are. They will insist their "spirituality" merely takes a different, less obvious form.

Um, no. Concede this one. Obviously the flame of spirituality doesn't burn very brightly in you (as it doesn't in me). Someone who believes in God and frequently think of God and His works is probably more "spiritual" than someone who almost never does.

In this case, this woman seems to feel guilty about her non-maternal instincts. She seems defensive about why she feels no strong drive to procreate but so many of her fellow women do.

Rather than simply making a perfectly defensible argument (if one is even needed) such as "Well, this is my choice and I should have no shame about that" or "People are different, and I just don't seem to have the reproductive drive" or anything along the lines, she feels compelled, it seems, to argue that not only is her decision defensible, but also optimal and universal, in that all women should join her in her I Don't Know Nothin' About Birthin' No Babies Crusade.

A perfectly valid choice is thus warped and perverted into a lunatic call for the extermination of the human race as part of the Gender Wars.

What the hell does she care if other women don't agree with her and want to have children? Why must her decisions be all women's decisions?

Because that's how her mind works. It's just not possible that she is interested by selfish motives (the desire to live the simpler life of a non-parent). It's not even possible to admit she is making one valid decision among many.

No, it must be the case she is making the Best Possible Decision for all people, for all women. And she's got a blog manifesto to prove it.

This, I submit, is puerile and simply fucking weird. This is childish. Children do this -- they are still in the phase of believing, as their loving parents do, that they are perfect in all ways possible. They cannot admit imperfection; they even have difficulty admitting mere ordinariness.


digg this
posted by Ace at 11:43 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Duke Lowell : "Hmmmmmmm. Weird. ..."

Slapweasel, (Cold1), ([b]T[/b]) Baseball Nut [/i] [/b] [/u] [/s]: "*Boom-Shakka-Lakka!* ..."

Alberta Oil Peon, survivor of GNAMM: "Coolest physics demo I saw was a standing wave, di ..."

buzzion: "[i]386 Oh dear, am I gonna go all militant German ..."

tu3031: "Went to school near there in the 80's - very Irish ..."

2009Refugee: "Oh dear, am I gonna go all militant German Left Wi ..."

buzzion: "[i]381 Baader-Meinhof. Posted by: flounder, rebel ..."

flounder, rebel, vulgarian, deplorable, winner: "Coolest physics demo I saw was a standing wave, di ..."

riktheYFITB: "Know how there's one (1) Howard Johnson's restaura ..."

Bob @ NSA: "[i]I had never heard of that bowling ball demo, th ..."

flounder, rebel, vulgarian, deplorable, winner: "Baader-Meinhof. ..."

Professor Chaos aka gumdrop gorilla: "This Damon Affleck thing is also not good for Jimm ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64