Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Does Barack Obama Read Ace Of Spades? UPDATE: Confirmed! | Main | The Handwriting is On the Wall
June 13, 2008

My Last Word on Boumediene

...hopefully. There has been a lot of discussion about how many constitutional protections are now possessed by the Guantanamo Bay detainees. The short answer is that we don't really know. Most obviously, they now have the constitutional right to have the legality of their detention examined in the federal courts. But the courts do not have any standards by which to measure the legality of detained alien military prisoners.

I suspect that many courts, when faced with the detainees' petitions, will be tempted to use the standards applied in habeas petitions from imprisoned criminals, since that is the type of habeas petition they are usually faced with. (The other possibility is habeas petitions from individuals held in contempt of court.) For those petitions, the courts look for constitutional deficiencies in the imprisonment. For example, whether the petitioner had access to a lawyer or a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment. The court's examination is predicated on the understanding that the petitioning prisoner had constitutional rights to begin with.

What happens when the petitioning prisoner's constitutional rights are unclear, as is the case for the Guantanamo Bay detainees? No one really knows. Not all constitutional protections apply in all situations. Some of those limitations are explicit in the Constitution and some are not. For example, the Sixth Amendment protections textually apply only to criminal prosecutions. On the other hand, many of the criminal procedure rules which are derived from the Fourth Amendment apply differently depending on whether the proceedings are criminal or administrative in nature. Now, the Sixth Amendment clearly won't apply to military trials. But whether and how the Fourth Amendment will apply to military prosecutions is an open question. As I wrote yesterday, we just have no idea which protections apply to aliens who have no connection to the U.S. except for their capture by the military.

Common law rules are even more problematic. In the U.S., due process requires that the use of hearsay be sharply restricted even beyond the requirements of the Sixth Amendment. The common law rules of hearsay have been codified in all fifty states and federal law for criminal and civil proceedings, but the common law still exists. Do those common law rules apply with the same force to military prosecutions? I don't know, and no one else does either. There is no doubt that the Guantanamo Bay detainees have some Fifth Amendment due process right. I'm sure that due process requires some protection from hearsay. But I have no idea how much protection is required for this particular group of individuals: enemy alien combatants in military custody.

That question, in fact, all of the questions I raise above, are now in the hands of more than a dozen federal district court judges who probably have dozens of different theories between them. Those clashing theories will have to be hashed out by the various circuit courts and any disagreements among the circuit courts will have to be resolved by the Supreme Court. Guess who can't intervene to answer the questions? Congress. Unlike with the Hamdi and Hamdan decisions, which explicitly left Congress to cure the deficiencies, this ruling gives Congress very few options (even if Congress were inclined to do something).

I've long been sharply critical of Justice O'Connor, but for this case I would definitely have traded Kennedy for her. Even if O'Connor had concurred with the liberal result, she never would have agreed to this, no doubt because she was formerly a legislator herself. Kennedy was a law professor and it shows. Uh, not that I have anything against law professors...

digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 11:28 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Ciampino - Baroque (adj.): When you are out of Monet?: "Well a lot of the 80s pop music had that annoying ..."

Schnorflepuppy [/s] [/b] [/i] [/u]: "Good evening, Horde, and thanks Weirddave for the ..."

Dr. Bone: "Ding - dong, the ding-dong, ha-ha-ha! So who's ..."

G'rump928(c): "I might be willing to do murder for those chops. ..."

Dash my lace wigs!: "All I know is if Biden, RFK and Trump are on the b ..."

Captain Josepha Sabin -- Persian cats are nothing more than 24/7 shedding machines.: "Not first. Rats. ..."

Doof: "NOOD duties have been performed ..."

G'rump928(c): "The drums have stopped! ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant: "That cutting board with the meat on it reminds me ..."

G'rump928(c): "Huh ..."

Zeera the ungoverened: "Yo and thanks WD! ..."

Doof: "NOOD. ONT is up ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64