Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Rick Moran Sagely Informs Us: Exposing Beauchamp's Fables Has Not -- Repeat, Not -- Secured The Victory In Iraq | Main | Non-TNR/STB Tips Welcome
August 07, 2007

Franklin Foer Stays on Offense, Accuses Critics of "Smears" and "Reckless Charges"

Edit: The new hed was added as an update to the old one. As the old hed is just plain wrong, and the new one is actually worth reading about, I've switched their order. The old post, with the old hed, appears after the fold.

Freudian Slipping: This is the second time I wrote Foer stays "on office" when I meant "on offense." Actually, writing that a third time, I did it again-- I wrote "I meant 'on office'" yet again before correcting myself.

Franklin Foer remains on office, at least as of last night, accusing the Weekly Standard of a "smear job" against him and his "diarist" and of moving from "one reckless charge to another."

Barnett takes him down.

Let's be clear about this, Frank: There never was actual fact-checking before you ran this piece. You've said as much, by stating you only passed the story around to other journalists to see if it "smelled good." Not if it was factual, and verifiably so, but merely if it was within the limits of plausibility.

That is not "fact"-checking no matter how many times you redefine the term. That is merely plausibility-checking. Or smell-checking.

As I've written before, the scandal was already complete when you published these articles without fact-checking. It didn't matter ultimately if you got lucky and could establish veracity after the fact, because you're supposed to be doing the fact check before publishing, and you didn't. Whether you got lucky or not, you'd already committed the sin that TNR of all magazines ought not to have committed in the first place.

As for the "realist" meme now out there -- that not only do small magazines not fact-check, but neither does the MSM generally, save for a few notable magazines priding themselves on a truly professional and thorough fact-check -- that's all fine and good, and I'm prepared to accept the realistic view of the MSM's inability and disinclination to fact check the very moment they admit this is in fact their practice.

While they continue to maintain that each story is lovingly scrubbed and thoroughly examined by an entire platoon of Law Review geeks who get sexual pleasure out of challenging and questioning the reportage of their stories, then I'm going to continue taking them at their word.

If they insist on maintaining this fiction of fact-checking, I'll play along and pretend too -- and I'll continue pointing out where this much-fabled fact-checking seems not to have occurred at all.

Thanks to CJ for both of those links.

TNR Deletes "Shock Troops"?
It appears Not; Story Is Still There, Findable Via Google

Charles Johnson searches and comes up empty.

I have no faith whatsoever in my search-engine skills, but for what it's worth, the keywords "shock troops" didn't bring the article up.

On the other hand, a search for "baghdad diarist" did reveal an earlier piece, "War Bonds." The one where he claims that a section of Iraq is called "Little Venice" as it's so flooded with sewage it resembles the canal-cut geography of that city. (In fact, Steve Spruiell has noted "Little Venice" refers to an entirely different area due its having.... actual canals.)

Not sure what's going on. The Plank is simply ignoring the entire story, which of course means that management and the editors are trying to puzzle out precisely what to do.

Time-out error? Is the TNR server just getting crushed with requests for the story? Googling "shock troops baghdad" turns the story up as the first (and second) search term; but then clicking on that link gives me time-out errors. Until finally it shows up. The comments eventually show up, too,

I don't know how these things work so I don't know what's going on. The story does still seem to be there, though. Why "shock troops" doesn't register in TNR's search engine I don't know, but then, the search engine for this blog was very balky before it crapped out entirely. Who knows. It's hard to imagine they're trying to hide it, given that the full story is now available without subscription (previously I had to view the cached version; now I can see the actual piece), they seem to be doing the opposite of hiding it.

Besides, hiding it would be stupid. It has to be the most-read piece in the last ten or fifteen years of TNR. (Ironically enough.)

If the story actually does disappear, I trust it would only be for purposes of moving it in preparation of a retraction and apology.

digg this
posted by Ace at 12:47 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Tony: "The Irish, Italians, Jews, Germans, and Scandinavi ..."

Grumpy and Recalcitrant: "[i]{329} ... I would be completely unable to resis ..."

Sbroxcm of the Kanamits: "and here I thought they wanted to perfect Man, not ..."

BurtTC: "Have you ever been publicly marked for death by ve ..."

LenNeal has a weird sense of humor: "Part of the problem is decent, peaceable people ar ..."

Deplorable Jay Guevara[/i][/s][/b] : "What a dismal and pessimistic view of the world, a ..."

BurtTC: "Ronald Reagan had so many good quotes. The scar ..."

Tom Servo: "Hostage negotiations fell apart when Hamas said th ..."

Thomas Bender: "Saw Godzilla Minus One, easily in the top two of b ..."

Dr. Pork Chops & Bacons: "Hunting down hamas leaders was a given. Wonder wh ..."

LinusVanPelt : "The CFP committee got it right (wonder of wonders) ..."

Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "[i] Democrat/Union/Progressive machine[/i] Big ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64