Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Recent Entries
THE MORNING RANT: Columbus Day Buck Shots
Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 10/14/24 Daily Tech News 14 October 2024 Sunday Overnight Open Thread (10/13/24) Minimal Content Edition Gun Thread: Pre- TXMoMe Edition! Third Trump Assassination Thwarted Food Thread: Hummus! Is There A Pun To Be Made With Humus? No. First-World Problems... Tampon Timmy Does Another Failed "Make Me Look Normal" Event Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Dying to be green [dri] |
Main
| ABC Airs Moonbat Fantasia Last Night [Kensington] »
August 05, 2007
Law Lesson: Unlawful Combatants [Gabriel Malor]One of the things I’ve noticed over the last three or four years of national debate about the War on Terror is that it is oddly common for people to ignore international law—even when it supports their arguments. This has been a pet peeve of mine for a while, simply because I do not like to see anyone leave a good argument lying on the table. With the hope that you never leave an argument alone simply because it’s about a sticky subject, here are some simple, straightforward, and useful facts about international law that may help you out the next time you’re talking about current events. Warning: This one got lengthy. My apologies. Also, see the update at the bottom. Current Event That Prompts Discussion: The Bush Administration attempts to put a combatant-detainee to military commission. It makes a big splash in the news and on blogs. That day you’re at the coffeepot (your old friends at the watercooler having decided to shun you because of your irritating command of international law on the topics of “illegal wars” and “indefinite detentions”) when one of your co-workers decides to take the opportunity to exclaim on the matter. Leftist Commentary #1: If you actually look at the Geneva Conventions it never mentions “illegal” or “unlawful” combatants. Your Answer: And? (I usually blink at them a few times to emphasise that I’m certain that they haven’t made a point.) You’re right, the terms "unlawful combatant" and "illegal combatant" do not appear. That’s because the Geneva Conventions describe classes of people who get special protection, not those who don’t get protected. Look, each convention protects a different group: the first and second conventions protect wounded or sick servicemen, the third protects prisoners of war, and the fourth protects civilians. Each convention contains a description of just who falls into its protection. Some of the combatant-detainees do not fall under any defined class. They’re obviously not wounded or sick servicemen so GenCons (I) and (II) are out. Some clever folks have tried to pigeonhole combatant-detainees into GenCon (IV) which protects civilians, but Article 5 of that convention says that a person “suspected of or engaged in active hostilities” has no right to claim protections. So that brings us right back to where we really thought we’d be all along: The Geneva Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Each combatant-detainee should be adjudged (Geek Points if you actually use the word “adjudged”) according to whether they meet any of the convention’s definitions of POW (there are six!). Those that do are referred to as “protected persons” or “lawful combatants” because they’ve managed to participate in the internationally approved methods of warfare. They get protected, lucky them. Those combatant-detainees that don’t meet any of the convention’s definitions of POW are simply out of luck because they engaged in warfare in a manner that exceeded or avoided the rules of international armed conflict. They are called “unlawful combatants” and the protections that POWs get don’t apply to them. (Note, however, that other, lesser, protections apply to everyone at all times. We can talk about that later. We’ll also have to talk another time about why there is such a thing as rules of warfare at all; the short answer is that the rules exist and should be upheld because they ultimately protect civilians from the atrocity of violent conflict.) Leftist Commentary #2: (Probably both weary and wary now, your coffeepot interrogator may continue.) But I’ve heard that the POW definitions include things like militias and people who rise up to defend their country from invaders. We invaded their country, fer cryin’ out loud, and you’re saying that they weren’t even allowed to defend themselves. Your Answer: No. I’m saying that they were only allowed to defend themselves in accordance with the laws and customs of war (those pesky rules again, God love ‘em). Here, look at this. (You’ll want to pull out your cheat-sheet for this, because unless you’re really into this stuff there’s no reason for you to memorize the six categories of POWs.) The GenCon (III) protects only these groups: (1) Members of the armed forces; You mentioned militias and levee en masse (that’s just the fancy term for a spontaneous uprising; use it, you’ll sound smarter than I know you are). Well, militia members have to meet those listed criteria. The Taliban, Al Qaida, and Iraqi insurgent groups do not. And levee en masse is limited to “non-occupied territories” and “spontaneous” uprisings, not uprisings that go on for four years. Simply put, these fellows aren’t POWs. The only group of prisoners that we’ve encountered in the War on Terror which are certainly POWs are captured Iraqi Republican Guard members and they’ve long since been released or turned over to the Iraqi government in the case of potential criminal behavior. (Now, smile kindly, tell them to stop believing everything they read on dKos, and demand that they stop hogging the non-fat creamer.) Update on my posts: Thanks for your comments. Those that commented in the “Illegal Wars” post may want to check back there for my reply if they haven’t already done so. I’m always happy to dig into these issues; for those that want to get into more specifics about them, I’ll try and keep an eye on the comments and respond as able. If Ace decides to continue the Open Blog Weekend idea, I’ll be back with posts on other international law topics including just war theory, preemptive war, and the Supreme Court cases Hamdi and Hamdan. I’ve also got a response in the works to the rather forceful commenter in my Air Travel post and would like to broach some domestic law issues including so-called “anchor babies,” habeas corpus, and the interface between warfare and the criminal justice system. Unfortunately, I have some obligations that will keep me from doing anything more than checking in occasionally for the duration of the day. My thanks go out to the moron-commenters here and, of course, to the Moron-in-Chief for letting me post on his blog. | Recent Comments
Cicero (@cicero43):
"I like to think of this as "Indians Finally Get Th ..."
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] : "Noodus throckmortonii ..." SturmToddler: "corgis properly summoned. now to the content ..." Aetius451AD: "Prometheus was a Titan. Make of it what you will. ..." SturmToddler: "buck nood ..." Ciampino - Si Ispettore, il freddo e terribile: " Europa ..." SturmToddler: "i shall summon the otters... ..." People's Hippo Voice: "When VA goes from 10 points to Biden to unable to ..." SturmToddler: "FIRST!! ..." Cicero (@cicero43): "There is no Titan. Posted by: Jack Harper at Octo ..." [/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "[i]Really? A globe covered in ice? Fucking (not i ..." Cuthbert the Witless: "294 "Like in that "I'm a man" ad - the first "man" ..." Recent Entries
THE MORNING RANT: Columbus Day Buck Shots
Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 10/14/24 Daily Tech News 14 October 2024 Sunday Overnight Open Thread (10/13/24) Minimal Content Edition Gun Thread: Pre- TXMoMe Edition! Third Trump Assassination Thwarted Food Thread: Hummus! Is There A Pun To Be Made With Humus? No. First-World Problems... Tampon Timmy Does Another Failed "Make Me Look Normal" Event Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |