On the Trail of the Forger

Wizbang's got his own evidence.

It's possible that there are multiple parties involved with varying degrees of culpability. Some people might merely (ahem) have "helped" the forger by offering the sort of "facts" that should appear in them -- and perhaps they agreed to corroborate the story. Not the actual documents, mind you, but the claim that similar documents existed.

Whoever is responsible, there is no getting around the fact that one of Dan Rather's vigorously-declared "unimpeachable sources" is actually a forger.

Not that that any way undermines the "basic story" or the "questions raised by the documents," of course.

posted by Ace at 03:22 PM

| Access Comments