Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Recent Entries
Before Nightfall A Corpse Was All That Was Left Of The ONT
Flight of the Canards Cafe Is "Havana Syndrome" Real? "Brokenism:" The Main Political Battle of Our Time Study: The New York Times Stoked Fear Over Covid Plus: GAINZZZ Reminder: As the Election Approaches, Politicians Are Falling Over Themselves to Brand Themselves as Bigots and Secretly Implement Racist Policies The NY Times is Whining About Memes Again. That's a Good Sign. The Last Time the Drearily Pious Atheists Were This Exercised About Memes Was 2016. Former Clinton Advisor Mark Penn: ABC "News" Should Submit to a Full Third-Party Investigation to Determine If They Schemed to Fact-Check Only Trump The New Yorker Refuse to Correct Russian Misinformation, Still Claiming That Kamala Harris Never Endorsed Using US Taxpayer Money to Pay for Sex Changes for Illegal Alien Teenagers THE MORNING RANT: Harvard Launches “Introductory” Math Course for its Students Who Can’t Do 9th Grade Math Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Nature Vs. Nurture Sex-Change Experiment Leads to Double Suicides |
Main
| Is the War in Iraq Winnable?: The Long-Anticipated Iraqi Civil War »
May 13, 2004
Is the War in Iraq Winnable?Liberals keep asking this question. Some panicking conservatives are asking it, too. Allow us to answer. Is the war in Iraq winnable? No. It is not winnable. It is no longer winnable, and has not been winnable for some time. It was already won. It's not winnable in the same sense that a dead horse is not killable. For there to be a "war" at all, the other side -- whoever that may be -- must have some chance of "winning." The other side does not have any chance -- or, at least, no significant chance -- of "winning" anything much at all. The Sunni rebels in Fallujah cannot win back the country. Even if America were to take the John Kerry route and just bug out, the Shi'a majority would not suddenly grant power back to the Ba'athists. It would not happen. It could not happen. It is an impossibility. It is simply not the case that the majority of Iraqis are sitting there hoping for the Fallujah jihadists to "win," meaning to prevail politically over America and the non-Sunni majority, and assume power. There may be many Iraqis who want the Fallujah jihadists to bleed America -- to kill the troops whose major crime was fighting and winning a war the Arabs were powerless to, or lacked the courage to, fight and win themselves, in order to make some claim of vindictated honor -- but the majority of Iraqis don't actually want the Falljuah Ba'athists/Al Qaedaists/criminals to take over the country. And they would not permit them to, even if America fled with its tail between its legs. Strike that -- they would not permit them to, especially if America fled with its tail between its legs. One thing we're liking about the June 30 handover of power is that internal security will largely become a problem for Iraqis, with only support from Americans. At that point, Iraqis will be making most of the decisions and doing most of the dirty security work. And the thing is, as much as Iraqis might complain about our ruthless/brutal tactics, they're just saying that because people who lack power like to complain. Complaining is the way people without power protest their lack of power. The day that Iraqis are actually fighting the insurgents is the day Iraqis stop complaining about ruthlessness and brutality. Not that ruthlessness and brutality will cease; quite the opposite. There will be more ruthlessness and brutality than the American military would ever be allowed to inflict. But Iraqis will be doing it themselves, and hence, will have no one really to complain about. We've seen how Arabs and Muslims put down insurgencies in the past. It's not pretty. Although, in this case, such brutality will be richly justified. The UN might fuss, but who listens to them? The analysis is similar when it comes to Moqtada al-Sadr. What, precisely, is he fighting for? What political outcome is he actually hoping to achieve? He can't be fighting for actual control of Iraq. If he were actually so popular that he could ultimately assume power, he wouldn't need to be fighting now at all. We are turning over power on June 30; elections will be held by January. No one who has any real shot of running the country needs to engage in violence, because, once again, we're turning the damn country over shortly. al-Sadr is fighting not because there's a good chance he will be part of the Iraqi ruling class, but precisely because there isn't such a good chance. He hopes that by killing Americans, he can increase his profile and his political popularity. Perhaps he can. But it is important to bear in mind that he can only come to power if the majority actually wants him to do so. And if the majority actually wants him to do so -- well, once again, we are turning over Iraq on June 30, and there will be elections by January. If he were to come to power, which we think unlikely, it would not be because he won a "war," but because he increased his political popularity. Whether he fights us or whether he doesn't fight us, he's not going to "win" through war; he's going to win through political popularity, the same way any politician wins power. We've been chagrined lately at the panickiness seen throughout America, on both sides of the aisle. What do these shrieking ninnies think, precisely, is going to happen? We don't know. In the worse case scenario, there would be a country-wide, broad-based political/populist uprising in Iraq demanding that we evacuate the country immediately. But we have to note once again: Our goal has always been, ultimately, to honor the legitimate, broad-based political wishes of the Iraqi populace. If the Iraqis did suddenly say, as a whole, "Get out now," what is the big problem, exactly? We're planning to "get out" in some form or another over the next few months, retreating largely to our bases, to act only as a guarantor of the basic integrity of the poltical process, to protect Iraq from external threats, to occasionally provide assitance in maintaining internal security, and to, of course, project power throughout the region. If the Iraqis really did want us out -- and we mean the majority, of course -- why wouldn't we honor their wishes, assuming they were not becoming another terrorist state? We never had any plans to rule Iraq against the wishes of the majority of the public. So if the majority of Iraqis actually did ask us to depart, what, precisely, has been "lost"? Us leaving in Iraq in that fashion would not be "losing a war." It would complying with the legitimate majoritarian wishes of the Iraqi populace, which has always been our plan. So we're not quite sure what all the shrieking and nervous tics are about. We have accomplished all of our main goals in this war. In fact, we accomplished most of these main goals some time ago. We are now attempting not to win an actual war, but to conduct a humanitarian nation-building operation, at considerable cost in terms of dollars and American lives. If the Iraqis decide that our generosity and courage are no longer wanted, what is the downside to that, exaxtly? Our main goals at this point is not killing Fallujah rebels nor Sadrist criminals. We are killing them, of course, but that is a means to an end, not an end in and of itself. We are killing them in order to lessen the threat to our own troops and contractors and engineers in Iraq and to help make Iraq a more stable place in the future, when it's governing itself, and when it's patrolling itself. Our assistance on the latter score is an act of generosity and big-heartedness; it is not, however, an actual primary war-aim in and of itself. We should not fear Iraqis rejecting that generosity any more than we "fear" our unemployed cousin Norton refusing to take yet another loan from us. The only likely path to political power in Iraq is through, well, political power. Minorities cannot prevail over much greater majorities through force of arms, unless those minorities are much more well-funded and well-armed than the majorities, which is simply not the case in Iraq, nor is it likely to ever be. The carnage in Iraq is not a campaign to kill Americans in order to win the country for one minority group or another; it is a campaign simply to kill Americans, because that is all these people know how to do, or are capable of doing. American soldiers may die, and that is a tragedy, but the men who kill them cannot win some greater battle or achieve some greater political goal. Whoever ultimately rules Iraq will do so because they have obtained enough political popularity to do so, which is what America has always envisioned for Iraq anyway, and Sadrists and Fallujah Ba'athists cannot change that fact. | Recent Comments
Kindltot:
"[i]I suspect most people buying chicken feet are O ..."
Pug Mahon, Come Sail Away with me, You guys: ""Its a four hour drive from Atlanta to Charlotte. ..." t-bird: "[i]It would easy enough to have relief drivers for ..." Alberta Oil Peon: " Here's the blues version on the dawgs youtu.be/d ..." Werner Herzog Has Opinions: "A delirious Werner sings Oh the shark, babe has so ..." Haiti Has No Home Here: "And paws? They think 'claws' would turn people awa ..." Mister Ghost: "Collin Rugg @CollinRugg JUST IN: Illegal immigra ..." Mister Ghost: "River Otters = America's version of the Honey Badg ..." sock_rat_eez - [/i]they have been lying to us for decades[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "& g'night everyone! ..." haffhowershower: "Do the horse's hoofs have three parts and the rave ..." Alberta Oil Peon: " The drunk driver who killed the Gaudreau brothers ..." Haiti Has No Home Here: ""Its a four hour drive from Atlanta to Charlotte. ..." Recent Entries
Before Nightfall A Corpse Was All That Was Left Of The ONT
Flight of the Canards Cafe Is "Havana Syndrome" Real? "Brokenism:" The Main Political Battle of Our Time Study: The New York Times Stoked Fear Over Covid Plus: GAINZZZ Reminder: As the Election Approaches, Politicians Are Falling Over Themselves to Brand Themselves as Bigots and Secretly Implement Racist Policies The NY Times is Whining About Memes Again. That's a Good Sign. The Last Time the Drearily Pious Atheists Were This Exercised About Memes Was 2016. Former Clinton Advisor Mark Penn: ABC "News" Should Submit to a Full Third-Party Investigation to Determine If They Schemed to Fact-Check Only Trump The New Yorker Refuse to Correct Russian Misinformation, Still Claiming That Kamala Harris Never Endorsed Using US Taxpayer Money to Pay for Sex Changes for Illegal Alien Teenagers THE MORNING RANT: Harvard Launches “Introductory” Math Course for its Students Who Can’t Do 9th Grade Math Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |