UK PM and Effeminate Pussy Keir Starmer Vows He Will "Fiiiiiight" Any Move to Depose Him

Before that: This Effeminate Pussy just reduced the formerly "special relationship" between the UK and the US by announcing that the UK will no longer share "some" intelligence with the US... to protect his communist ally Maduro in Venezuela.

This is a major breach of our alliance.

The United Kingdom has suspended some intelligence sharing with the United States, its close ally, over the U.S. military's lethal strikes against alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, since London thinks the attacks are illegal and does not want to be implicated, multiple outlets reported on Tuesday.

The decision to halt intelligence sharing, which took place earlier this fall, highlights the range of skepticism regarding the Trump administration's legal justification for the vessel strikes, which so far have killed at least 76 people.

The U.S. garners intelligence from a variety of sources, including the UK, which oversees some territories in the Caribbean and offers information that assists the U.S. in identifying boats suspected of smuggling narcotics in the region.

The gathered intelligence is normally delivered to the Joint Interagency Task Force South (JIATFS), based in Key West, Fla., which works on monitoring and detecting suspected illegal trafficking targets and conducting counter-narcotic operations.

More than a dozen countries, including close U.S. allies, have liaison officers based at JIATFS, which is led by Coast Guard Rear Adm. Jeff Randall.

The British have radar bases and listening stations in the Caribbean. You've seen James Bond movies. They're like all set in the Caribbean. It's kind of stupid.

So this isn't nothing. The British are denying us intelligence collected at Jamaica, the Bahamas, etc.

If you missed it, Argentina is talking tough again about seizing the Falkland Islands from the British, and this time, I say we side with Argentina.

Not that these ponces will care much. They just signed over the nearly-unhinhabited but strategically useful Chagos Islands to Mauritius... which is very friendly with expansionist Red China.

These are the islands where the US maintains an absolutely vital base at Diego Garcia. The US will continue to have access to that base, for a while, as the UK negotiated a 99 year lease (on something they formerly owned)... but China will build its own base right next to ours soon enough. (The British negotiated a 24-mile buffer zone around Diego Garcia. Pretty sure a Chinese base 25 miles away would still be a threat.)

Back to the headline story:

Even the effeminate pussies at the Guardian admit that their ally Keir Starmer is the most unpopular PM in UK history.

However, they put a Happy Spin on it.

Yes, Keir Starmer is Britain’m's most unpopular PM ever. That could liberate him

Amazing. Hitler similarly felt liberated as the Wehrmacht dissolved. He felt so liberated he decided to YOLO a bullet into his own temple and liberate his cerebral cortex from his brain stem.

Forget the public vitriol and use the next four years to get things done -- first and foremost, whatever it takes to stop Reform

Somewhere in Greater Britain, a chicken cries out, "Help! I'm being sexually assaulted!"

(That is a real old-school reference.)

...

As often, Wes Streeting dares say what all can see: that there is "deep disillusionment in this country at the moment" and "a growing sense of despair about whether anyone is capable of turning this country round". The "change" Labour promised is not yet visible; we still lack a guiding light towards better things to come.

Note that name "Wes Streetling" for later.

Yet, even so, the current vitriolic state of public opinion is perplexing and alarming. Keir Starmer is the most unpopular prime minister ever.

...

As prime minister, he's short on charisma, they say: more seriously, he lacks political agility, ingenuity or instinct for where the wind blows.

...

Polling guru John Curtice warns them to stop chasing Reform voters: they've gone.

Labour's leader is failing; there's no denying it when pollsters suggest no leader could ever return from these unplumbed depths.

...

Unsurprisingly, panic on the back benches will make talk of leadership change rife if May's elections go as badly as predicted -- or, some suggest, sooner. I see aficionados reaching for the Labour party rulebook, reminding one another of a little-noticed but key change made at last year's conference. It's now easier to challenge a sitting leader at any time of year with a nomination backed by 20% of Labour MPs -- currently, 80 of them. Before, a leader was safe except in a brief pre-conference window.

...

Here's ministers' paradox: Labour's only hope lies in despair. Assume they will be wiped out whatever, so use this massive majority for four more years to follow their natural social democratic instinct: make radical tax reforms, raising plenty. Expect to lose the next election, so do everything now. Forget opinion polls and focus groups; let voters see sincerity in their purpose. The only way to restore some respect is to do transparently what they think most right and fair.

Well that's a plan. As with Hitler: YOLO it.

Remember how Labour got this huge majority: It was emphatically not because the public craved more feckless IngSoc communism and control. Just a few years before, the public handed the "Conservative" party an enormous majority, one of the largest in history.

No, Labour only won because the "Conservative" continued allowing hundreds and hundreds of thousands of immigrants, many "boat people" criminals escaping justice in their own home countries, and absolutely would not change this policy no matter how much their own voters demanded it.

Their own voters were not yet ready to embrace the "extremism" of Reform, so they choose the path of self-harm -- political cutting -- of voting for Labour to send a message.

A message Labour itself didn't get either, though they make insincere claims about wanting to "stop the boats."

There was never any desire for a return of IngSoc. People just wanted the boats stopped. Now they have more destructive socialism and more boat criminals.

The General Electios won't take place for a while. I think that Guardian scrunt mentioned May. We'll get to the May elections below.

But members of Keir Starmer's disaster-party are scheming to depose him before the scheduled party leadership vote.

Keir Starmer, the most demasculated man in the world -- even Justin Castreaux at least uses his left-wing effeminancy to smash mish -- vows he will "fight" with every atom of male strength he has, which is three. Three atoms of male strength.

Allies of the prime minister are making it clear he would fight any challenge to his leadership from Labour MPs.

There are fears from those loyal to Sir Keir Starmer that his job might be under immediate threat, perhaps as soon as shortly after the Budget in a fortnight's time.

Critics say it is evidence that Downing Street is "in full bunker mode" which "won't help the government out of the hole we're in."

You know who else went into full bunker mode?

I'm not the only one thinking about Hitler. Me and Important Conservative Thought Leader Nick Fuentes have Hitler on our minds.

Friends of Sir Keir are deeply worried about what they see as plotting going on to try to replace him and are seeking to make clear what they see as the grave risks of a leadership challenge.

You don't want none of this smoke, Friend-O.

Those names being discussed by Labour MPs as potential candidates to displace Sir Keir include some of his closest cabinet allies, especially Wes Streeting, the health secretary, and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood.

Absolutely Shabana Mahmood will deliver on Labour's insincere promise to stop the Islamic Invasion of Britain.

Some also speculate about the ambitions of Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, and backbenchers including the former transport secretary Louise Haigh.

The ambition of Streeting is seen with particular suspicion from some loyal to the prime minister.

Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Streeting called suggestions he would challenge Sir Keir "self-defeating nonsense", and said he was not standing against the prime minister.

Asked if he would ever consider making such a move, he replied: "I cannot see circumstances under which I would do that to our prime minister."

LOL. "I cannot foresee the eventualities under which such an ambition would even be contemplated" = "Yes."

Circumstances change, don't they, Colonel? Nice Army base you have 'ere. Would be a shame if anything were to 'appen to it.

He said the prime minister should sack the aide who was responsible for the briefing, which he described as "the worst attack on a faithful since Joe Marler was banished in The Traitors final".

He added that there was a "toxic culture" in Downing Street that needed to change.

...

Opinion polls suggest Sir Keir is deeply unpopular, perhaps even the most unpopular British prime minister in the history of modern opinion polling.

Polls also suggest the Labour Party has commanded the support of no more than a fifth of the electorate in recent months.

But, a move to replace Sir Keir isn't straightforward. Under Labour's rules, it would take 20% of its MPs to nominate a challenger - 81 given the current size of the parliamentary party in the Commons.

For months now, plenty in the Labour Party have acknowledged that the government faces a likely crunch point after devolved elections in Scotland and Wales and local elections in many parts of England next May.

Ohhh, parts of the UK outside of England itself will hold elections. Most Scots vote for the socialist, pro-transgender, grievance based Scottish National Party, because at least it also pushes for independence. But for second place, Reform has just moved past Labour in polls.

But we're only talking a few seats there, not nearly enough to strip Labour of its huge majority.

As for Wales, I think again they mostly support the "nationalist" Welsh party, Plaid Cymru. Plaid Cymru leads with 28%, with Reform close behind at 21%.

The figures for Wales put Plaid Cymru on 28%, with Reform on 21%, the Green Party on 19%, Labour on 15%, the Conservatives on 12% and the Liberal Democrats on 4%. Other parties were at 2%.

But again, we are talking about a few seats changing hands here and there. Maybe. Not nearly enough to dent the Labour Majority.

Labour is widely expected to do badly in those elections, but there are growing concerns from some in the party that it can't wait until then to contemplate a change of leader.

Downing Street is aware of the potential imminence of such a threat to them.

One senior Labour MP told us: "It's all very well to say wait for the locals, but that's my activist base I'm sending into the gunfire. I can't lose all my councillors."

Another Labour source said: "The list of reasons for people to move after the Budget are growing by the day.

"If Wes is brave and moves he may well be rewarded by being prime minister by Christmas."

...

The prime minister's supporters are telling Labour MPs they should be careful what they wish for.

They argue a leadership contest would plunge the party into the chaos associated with the final years of the Conservative Party's stint in office which came to an end last year, and install a leader who does not have their own mandate from the country.

They are trying to convince their colleagues that a contest could destabilise the international markets too, and would jeopardise the good relationship the prime minister has established with President Trump.

But others, including some ministers, fret about what they perceive to be the desperate position the government is in.

"It's terrible. He [Starmer] is hated out there. It is worse than it got under Corbyn. I don't see how this is sustainable until May," one minister said.

Keir Starmer is widely-acknowledged to be a sad vagina made from soft gray putty, but he wants you to know, he is a very feisty and fighty sad vagina.

Keir Starmer has backed Wes Streeting and refuted the "completely unacceptable" No 10 leaks amid mounting speculation the prime minister could face a leadership coup.

As a civil war erupts at the top of the Labour Party, the health secretary has categorically denied that he is plotting to oust Sir Keir and called for those in Downing Street briefing against him to face the sack.

Nah it wasn't categorical. He said he could not foresee the circumstances. That's such a non-categorical non-denial it's essentially a confirmation.

In a flurry of anonymous late-night briefings, allies of the prime minister came out fighting on his behalf amid fears his job could be under threat after the Budget in two weeks' time....

Speaking during a fiery PMQs, Sir Keir said that "any attack on any member of my Cabinet is completely unacceptable", and insisted that the health secretary is doing a "great job" as he highlighted his record on turning around the NHS.

During his speech at the NHS Providers conference in Manchester Mr Streeting suggested he was not "on manoeuvres".

...

Quizzed about a 2024 interview when he expressed his desire to be PM one day.

He said: I've got a hard job already, so I'm quite enjoying doing this, and I'm thank you very much."

Adding "I'm not going to say anything today that adds to the silly season that is going down."

He's totally not thinking of challenging Starmer just like Donkey-Chompers is totally not thinking of primarying Sloppy Schumer.

"I don't think that's a helpful or constructive thing to say, I also don't think it's true.

He doesn't "think it's true" that he's going to challenge Starmer? When will he have more certainty about that estimation?

Okay enough of this gay British pageantry.

How are you?

posted by Ace at 12:10 PM

| Access Comments