Federal Judge May Sanction Gavin Newsom's Transgender Government For Lying in Legal Filings About California's Determination to Trans Children Behind Their Parents' Backs

Gavin Newsom is playing hide-the-salami.

I mean, you already assumed that, but I mean he's playing it in court.

The state of California knew it would lose a case involving transing children behind their parents' back. So the state claimed they had changed the policy, thus "mooting" the case. Judges can't rule on moot cases, usually, so the manuever was designed to take the case out of the judge's hands before he could rule and establish precedent.

And then---

Whoops!

Whoopsie!

-- the supposedly "changed" policy popped right back up in teacher instruction materials, again telling teachers to trans children behind their parents' backs.

The judge is, how you say, arribiato.

Federal judge threatens to sanction California for 'misleading' him in 'gender secrecy' case

"Forced outings," when students are already publicly identifying as the opposite sex in school and demanding others use fake pronouns to them.

They're already "out" to everyone in the world -- except their parents.

Scott Penis just doesn't want their parents to know.

Groomers and pedophiles always tell children to keep special secrets from their parents.

State claimed lawsuit over muzzling teachers, hiding students gender identity from parents was moot because it removed FAQ page with challenged policies, but they secretly popped up again in required teacher training.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has repeatedly slurred a federal judge by name, echoing President Trump's history of diatribes against judges even before the current Democrat started copying the former Democrat's social media style and insulting nicknames.

The perceived contender for the 2028 Democratic nomination for president may cluck his tongue again when he sees the latest order from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in a lawsuit against The Golden State's alleged mandate on school districts to hide from parents their children's asserted gender identity at odds with sex.

The President George W. Bush nominee ordered state Attorney General Rob Bonta and the California Department of Education to "show cause" on why they should not be sanctioned for "misleading" Benitez so he would remove them from the suit by teachers who allege their school district muzzled them and parents of "gender incongruent children."

The state defendants' motions to dismiss and opposition to the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment claimed that CDE had "withdrawn and conclusively replaced" an FAQ page that contained the challenged policies, which they claimed was the "only basis" for being named defendants and thus made the case moot, Benitez wrote.

"However, evidence demonstrates that the CDE may have merely moved the challenged content of the FAQ page to a new, required 'PRISM' training module," as documented by the plaintiffs' lawyers at the Thomas More Society, the judge said, ordering state defendants to explain their behavior Nov. 17 in court.

"From day one, officials from the local school district all the way to the governor's mansion have tried to deflect responsibility" but "have now been caught not only lying to California taxpayers but attempting to mislead the Court to escape accountability," TMS Executive Vice President Peter Breen said in a statement.

...

It's the latest setback for state leaders in the case, in which Benitez has repeatedly sided with the plaintiffs.

...

The society filed an application for sanctions Friday, pointing to a California Family Council article Nov. 3 on the new PRISM teacher training that includes a screenshot of a slide with "language very similar to the FAQ page" that the CDE took down.

The article links to a recording of a PRISM training, which it dubs an "LGBTQ 'Loyalty Test,'" that CFC describes as part of a curriculum mandated by the California Safe and Supportive Schools Act, developed in consultation with LGBTQ advocacy groups including the ACLU, Trevor Project and California Teachers Association.

...

It makes explicit that school staff cannot tell parents if their children identify as the opposite sex, because they still have "a reasonable expectation of privacy" even if they are open about their gender identity at school. Schools can only disclose this to parents in "limited circumstances" such as "issues involving safety or wellness."

CFC said the training also falsely characterized the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act in a test at the end of the training, claiming it forbids schools from sharing a child's gender identity with parents when FERPA actually "protects parents' right to access their child's records, not the state's right to withhold them."

In other words, they claimed the law required the exact opposite of what it required. It transformed a parent's right-to-know into a teacher's duty-to-conceal.

And then, while maintaining that the "law" required a teacher to have a duty-to-conceal, they claimed that no such duty exists so the case should be thrown out because it's a moot issue.

There is a law. There isn't a law. There is a policy. There isn't a policy.

Whatever Gavin Newsom's Transgender Government identifies as at any stage of the lawsuit.

While taking down the FAQ page left school districts "in a state of ambiguity" rather than confirming they could disclose gender identity to parents without student permission, the state defendants tried to play it both ways, "affirmatively telling school districts that Parental Exclusion Policies were legally required, while arguing mootness to this Court."

Very much related: An update to the dude in lipstick wagging his pickle at women in a women's changing room at Gold's Gym.

There's a Transgender Cinematic Universe cross-over later in the tale.

The story, which you mostly know from last week:

Incidentally, she's a Grammy-nominated singer. I never heard of her, but at my advanced age of 29, that no longer surprises me.

She certainly belted out a number here.

A viral video shows singer Tish Hyman confronting a transgender woman she says was inside the women's locker room at a Los Angeles gym.

The incident happened at a facility formerly operated as Gold's Gym, now run by EoS Fitness.

"I was in shock. I was scared, and I told him to leave. He would not leave, and had no regard for my naked body," Hyman said.

Hyman says it wasn't the first time she's encountered men in the women's restroom at that gym. She claims it's happened four times in the past two weeks and that she filed multiple complaints with staff that went unanswered.

In the cellphone footage, Hyman can be heard shouting, "Stay out of the women's locker room, we don't want it!"

The person she confronted has not been identified, and there's no indication that any crime or violation occurred. Hyman says the situation escalated during a confrontation.

"He said to me, verbatim, 'Straight women like to see D (genitals) so if anything, they're looking at me more than you,'" she recalled. "I was in complete shock."

You got that right? "D" stands, of course, for "Genitals."

Obviously.

Following the confrontation, both were removed from the gym, and Hyman says her membership was revoked because of her outburst. She insists her reaction wasn't about discrimination but about boundaries.

"Trans people have a right to exist," she said. "They need their own locker rooms and their own spaces. It doesn't make sense to put them in the same room with women."

And now... the rest of the story.

The black lesbian woman victim of the transgender -- who for some reason grabbed his "lubricant" as he left the gym (why? hot date?) -- confronted Scott Wiener, yes, Scott Penis, the very same guy pushing groomer laws and reducing penalties for having sex with underaged children -- about why he's letting "The D" (standing for "Genitals") invade black lesbian women's spaces.

She says she supports everything this unconcionable pervert does, except, she insists, that he mus protect women, and then adds that she means real women, and that transwomen are -- get this -- "not women."

Well! That causes the room to erupt in shock and horror.

I usually find a clean copy of video without commentary by YouTube talkers, but I'm linking Black Conservative Perspective because it's fun watching him appreciate the "black lesbian woman" wielding "three Infinity Stones of Wokeness."

As he says, this black lesbian woman is competing with Latrine John-Pissoir (or "Cringe" Jean-Pierre, as he calls her) for maximum identity name-drops.

Foreman points out almost all of the shocked people are, get this, white liberals.

Tone policing a black lesbian woman! Can you even?!

Still -- she's right. Just not based on her "identity. Except for one: Yes, women's bathrooms are for Birthing Persons with the actual identity of "real woman."

So that's another crossover and connection in the Transgender Cinematic Universe.

Except there's one more: If you go back about thirty seconds from where I have the video cued up, you'll see Scott Wiener bragging about his efforts to ban "forced outings."

Also known as "keeping parents in the loop when a child tells everyone except his parents that he's adopted a Fashion Gender." The very policy mentioned in the first item in this post.

It's alllllll connected, as Producer Guy would say.

posted by Ace at 03:15 PM

| Access Comments