Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
The earlier 6700 non-XT slotted in neatly between the 8GB 128-bit 6600 XT and the 12GB 192-bit 6700 XT, with 10GB of RAM and a 160-bit bus. Since it was price to match, that was just fine.
We don't have a price on the 7700 yet, but we do have specs, and they're... Odd.
The 7800 XT (which I have) had 60 GPU cores and 16GB of VRAM on a 256-bit bus. The 7700 XT cut the cores by only 10% to 54, but the memory down to 12GB on a 192-bit bus.
The new, non-XT 7700 model cuts the cores all the way down to 40, but leaves the memory size at 16GB on a 256-bit bus. A lot of memory and a lot of memory bandwidth for a relatively modest GPU configuration.
AMD hasn't issued a press release yet so right now all of this is supported by just one link and one web page. Admittedly those are both on AMD's own site, but an actual product launch would be welcome confirmation.
Compared with the 32 core 7600 XT from the same range, it is clocked 20% lower, so compute performance is almost identical, but it has twice the memory and memory bandwidth.
Might be interesting to see the benchmarks on this - it would highlight which games and applications really need that bandwidth.
I'm just reading the blog article and I regret it too.
Even with ten small models running independently, the Pi cluster is slower than a single Framework Desktop costing around $2000.
And if you run a single large model across the whole cluster, things actually get worse; now the $2000 system is at least 5x faster than the $3000 cluster.
Because Threadripper and Threadripper Pro fit in the same socket even though Threadripper Pro has twice the memory channels and PCIe lanes.
You can fit a Threadripper Pro into a regular Threadripper motherboard like this one and it will work fine - just reduced from eight memory channels to four, and with half the PCIe lanes no longer wired up to anything.
Unless the board is exactly this one in which case all eight memory channels are still available and wired to eight slots.
Which means that if you're a regular user with a regular non-Pro Threadripper, there are four memory slots on the motherboard that you simply can't use.
Also, the fourth M.2 slot only works if you have a Threadripper Pro CPU.