Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
In the ongoing legal dispute between Apple and Epic Games over Apple's theft of 30% of everything, Apple was ordered to produce a million documents relating to changes to the App Store.
As Epic constantly points out, this document production is all downside for Apple because it relates to Apple's alleged lack of compliance with the Court's injunction. It is not in Apple's interest to do any of this quickly. This is a classic moral hazard, and the way Apple announced out of the blue four days before the substantial completion deadline that it would not make that deadline because of a document count that it had surely been aware of for weeks hardly creates the impression that Apple is behaving responsibly.
Apple's request for an extension of time is DENIED. The deadline for the substantial completion of document production is Monday, September 30. It's up to Apple to figure out how to meet that deadline, but Monday is indeed the deadline.
Good to see. I have no particular love for Epic Games, but Apple acts like a classic monopolist, constantly skirting the edge of open illegality.
The N305 (and the other option, the four core N100) don't have a lot of PCIe lanes so those four SSDs all run at PCIe 3.0 x1 - a maximum speed of 1GB per second each.
But this is designed to run as a simple NAS, and the two 2.5Gb Ethernet ports combine to about 0.5GB per second, so that bandwidth is unlikely to be the limiting factor.
Apart from that there are two HDMI ports and two USB ports. A pretty spartan selection but just fine for a mini-NAS.
They previously used Cassandra, which is written in Java, and which I have used myself. ScyllaDB is compatible but written in C++, and they have found it to be far more robust on this scale than Cassandra.
They've also cut the number of database servers needed in half, now having 72 servers each with 9TB of storage. Which is a lot of servers, but not a lot of disk; you could easily fit that much storage in a single 2U rackmount system. And it would only cost about $100k - a lot for you or me, but nothing for even a modestly successful company.
So if you are stuck with a Cassandra database and it is causing you pain, ScyllaDB might be the way out.
Disclaimer: No, there is no CharybdisDB. I checked.