Kamala Harris in 2019: Why Yes, I Believe There Should Be a Separate Legal Code for Black People Only

Thanks to Shain S. relaying a tip by Anonysaurus Wrecks, Kamala Harris race-pandered in her usual clumsy, grasping, extremist way by agreeing with a black voter that yes, Black People Need Their Own Separate-But-Unequal Legal System.

And remember, she's a super-duper prosecutor who's really Tough On Crime.

She was campaigning in a black barbershop. Because Kamala doesn't do subtle pandering.

Man: We're talking about things that specifically happened to black people. So we have to be specifically targeting those people ... America you did this to THESE (black) people. You should write laws for THESE people. Don't group us in with everybody ... Let's be fair, we're playing from behind the 8 ball, we're way back there. 400 years back there ...

Kamala: That's right. That's right.

NotTheBee comments:

Literally, this man in the nice suit is saying "Black people need their own special laws to help them get ahead because we are 400 years behind due to slavery."

Do you think this man read the 1619 Project before this interview?

Peter Doocy asked Latrine John-Pissoir where Kamala Harris got her newly-discovered black southern drawl from. Did this Canadian-San-Franciscan also grow up in Georgia?

Latrine John-Pissoir laughs at the question. She almost says "We should be talking about policy," but then remembers: Kamala Harris doesn't want to talk about policy. CNN's leftwing anchor Abby Phillip remarks that Trump hasn't been able to define Kamala Harris, permitting her to not break with Biden and continue playing to both leftwing audiences, those who love the woke disaster of the Biden-Harris Regime and those who are leftwing but want to turn the page from those disasters.

On Tuesday's broadcast of "CNN NewsNight," anchor Abby Phillip stated that 2024 Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris made "a very clear, concerted choice" to avoid breaking with President Joe Biden during her interview with CNN last week and argued that "Trump's inability to make the case against her...has allowed her to not actually really break with Biden, in a lot of ways."

Phillip said, "I feel like, at this table, we've been talking about exactly that...basically, since Kamala Harris came into this race as the top of the ticket, Trump's inability to make the case against her is the biggest thing. And it also has allowed her to not actually really break with Biden, in a lot of ways. She -- in her interview with CNN last week, she outlined what she was running on, but she didn't break with Joe Biden, and that seemed to me to be a very clear, concerted choice on her part."

I bring this up because Latrine John-Pissoir laughs at bringing up this Style Point about Kamala's fake new pander-accent, but what else is there we're allowed to ask about? Kamala Harris won't say what her policies are; she wants to run on "vibes."

So, okay: What about the "vibe" of the inauthentic fake accents she's putting on like costumes?

I think Doocy missed an opportunity here. When Latrine John-Pissoir attempted to shame him for asking a question about a frivolous matter, he should have responded: "Okay, then, if you want a more substantive question-- can you answer this on her behalf: Does Kamala Harris stand with Biden's economic policies, or not?"

So: what's the answer?

Quick Hit: Amid skyrocketing energy prices, more Americans are facing the harsh reality of choosing between basic necessities like food, rent, and electricity. The Biden-Harris administration's energy policies are under scrutiny as extreme weather exacerbates energy poverty, particularly in underserved communities.

Many Americans, like Stacey Freeman, are struggling to afford energy bills, often forced to choose between utilities and essential needs.

Energy poverty disproportionately impacts low-income households and communities of color, with 16% of U.S. households now classified as energy-poor.

Rising temperatures and extreme weather conditions are increasing the burden on those already facing financial hardship.

Meanwhile, even ultra-lefty CNBC is breaking with Kamala Harris over her latest Commutard proposal to tax unrealized GAINZZZ.

What does that mean? That means if you buy an asset, like a stock or piece of property, it may rise in value -- theoretically, because you don't know the actual value until you sell it to a real live buyer offering a real live price -- during your period of ownership. When you sell it, those GAINZZZ become "realized" -- made real -- and then you pay taxes on the increase in value.

She wants to tax assets that aren't sold -- she wants to tax what the government appraises their hypothetical, guestimated, phantom value if you were to sell them.

Does the government give you back money when the value of your assets decrease?

Of course not. And you're racist for even asking, Bigot.

Note that Mark Cuban says he hears secretly from Kamala Harris's Policy Whisperers that this will never happen, but the female CNBC host says this is bullshit, either she can say these things publicly, or they don't count. She asks, "How do you know that the people telling you this story are telling you the truth, and what Kamala is saying publicly is the lie?"

This is Kamala's entire strategy: Yasser Arafat campaigning. Telling one thing to one group in Arabic -- we're going to tax the shit out of the rich -- and then telling a more moderate thing, in English, to the less-radical audience -- we're not going to tax the shit out of the rich, we're just telling the dum-dums that.

And few in the media are willing to demand she tell ONE story to ALL listeners.

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 05:33 PM

| Access Comments