Quick Tips

Here's the Deep State Panic Op, the BREAKING RUSSIAN THREAT they're announcing to pressure Speaker Johnson to call a vote on the treasonous Ukraine aid bill: the Russians might put nuclear weapons... IN SPAAAAAACE.

You know, the way both the US and Soviet Union have played with the idea of putting nuclear weapons IN SPAAAAACE since the 1970s.

But it's a breaking threat that threatens us RIGHT NOW because the Deep State needs an op to pressure their opposition with.

These weapons aren't even ground-striking nukes -- they're designed to... blow up satellites.

Again, this is shit we've been talking about since 1975.

Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) sparked national concern on Wednesday when he released an urgent notice warning of a "serious national security threat." Members of Congress are now being briefed on the matter. Multiple sources tell me that CNN’s original reporting on the threat being Russia-related is accurate. Two sources further tell me that this is a space-based nuclear weapons threat.

Top line: It appears that Russia is in the process of deploying (via multiple recent satellite launches), or is preparing to deploy, an anti-satellite-based nuclear weapons system into space. Concerns have escalated amid Russian military-related satellite launches, the most recent of which occurred last week.

Um... how does funding Ukraine stop Russia from doing this?

It doesn't. Op failed.

Is there such a thing as "Anxiety Nostalgia"?

We're going to have to prosecute and imprison the Deep Staters. There is no other way. They will not stop their Permanent Coup against the people of the United States until they are stopped.

@TheInsidePaper

JUST IN - Putin says he would prefer Joe Biden to win US election rather than Donald Trump - FT

Via JackStraw.

@MailOnline 13m

Disgraced politician Anthony Weiner's ex-wife Huma Abedin, 47, reveals she is dating George Soros' billionaire playboy son Alex, 38

Via weft-cut loop.

Christopher F. Rufo @realchrisrufo

In 1970, 10% of Americans had a college degree. Today, 40% of Americans have a college degree.

This means, by simple math, that the average intelligence of college graduates has plummeted and, simultaneously, creates a large cohort of Americans who feel entitled to "college-worthy professions" without the intellectual aptitude for them.

They call this "the overproduction of elites" but that's a bad way to frame it. These people are not elites. They think they have elite credentials, but they actually don't. What they are are elite aspirants who have been sold a much-devalued credential and a lie for $200,000.

Hence, the explosion of email jobs, DEI offices, and administrative positions--which are the most susceptible to capture by resentment ideology.

Meanwhile, the cost of this college-degree bubble is shifted onto taxpayers, as the $1.6 trillion student loan scheme is funded, subsidized, and guaranteed by the federal government.

This won't end well. Conservatives should be ready for the bubble to eventually pop, and work to privatize student loans, put immense pressure on the system, and put state-backed higher ed into contraction.

An ideal might be 20% of Americans with a college degree--meaning a reduction of slots by approximately half. Job training, technical schools, and community colleges are much better options for the 60th-80th percentile: faster, cost-efficient, and oriented toward productive work, rather than ideology.

Biden's "defense" of his failure to remember when Beau died was that he was so angry and incensed that the special counsel would ask him such a thing about an Official State Secret That Joe Biden Has Vowed Never To Talk About (except in every other speech), that he silently fumed to himself, "How dare you bring that up."

Supposedly, then, Biden wasn't having "lost time" when asked this question, but smoldering with manly, virile, and quite youthful rage.

Via Chuck Ross: You're not going to believe this, but that was a lie.

All of those of you who said "I bet Biden brought up Beau, just likes he brings up Beau whenever he's in trouble," head to the Ace of Spades Casino Cashier to collect $1000 in Ace Chips.

A Politico hack ruthlessly interrogates Pete Bootyjudge about Biden's mental acuity, and gets this powerful admission:

Yeah... and Ruth Bader Ginsberg was running circles around her 25-year-old physical trainer! He was exhausted trying to keep up with her inexhaustible energy!

Until... she died. Then it became relatively easier to keep up

with her.

Good article about former science journals like Nature and the New England Journal of Medicine deciding that the world can't do without their Expert Opinions on Politics, throwing away their reputations to shift approximately zero votes.

Confirmed: Catherine Herridge was fired by CBS "News" for breaking the wrong kind of news. Like, actual news, not just barely-rewritten DNC propaganda.

Well, not confirmed, exactly.

But well evidenced.

Collin Rugg @CollinRugg

JUST IN: CBS News reporter Catherine Herridge fired in company wide layoffs conducted by Paramount Global.

Herridge was one of 800 people who got axed on Tuesday in Paramount Global's massive cost-cutting operation.

Herridge was fired just hours after she reported on how Biden may have "retained sensitive documents related to specific countries involving his family's foreign business dealings."

"The Committees require this (Biden/Hur interview) transcript... there is concern that President Biden may have retained sensitive documents related to specific countries involving his family's foreign business dealings..." she posted on X yesterday.

Wild.

Megyn Kelly mentioned that CBS "News" intended to give Biden a powderpuff fellacioius interview for the Super Bowl, conducted by leftwing racialist hack... Gayle King.

And he still wasn't confident in his ability to answer easy questions from an open Democrat partisan.

A Valentine's Day card from Robert:

It refers to The Trolley Problem, a hypothetical intended to illuminate someone's preference for utilitarianism or moral imperatives. The trolley problem goes like this: a runaway train is approaching a switch. If it stays on the track it's on, it will run over and kill five people. If you throw the switch to change tracks, it will miss the five people, but kill the one person on that track.

So less people will be killed if you throw the switch. But, if you throw the switch, you will be directly responsible for intentionally killing the one person. You won't be directly responsible for the deaths of the five people, if you choose to do nothing.

So do you throw the switch?

I guess you can say "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice (ba-dum-dum)," so not throwing the switch is equally directly and intentionally killing the five people, and either way, you're making a choice of who lives and who dies, so you might as well save more people.

I think that's how I see it. Rush Rules.

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 06:37 PM

| Access Comments