Update on Illegal Alien Nudist Hemp Jeweler BLM-Flag-Flying Ultra MAGA Mega Republican

"You know, that old saw." -- Dr. Evil

Wait, can't you see that? That's right, because, as Thinkfluencer John Ekdahl tells me, NBC is now deleting that from their website and Twitter feed.

Why would they do that? Why would they hide their own report?

Well watch this cop The Blaze captured and guess.

I don't think there's enough evidence to establish the speculation that's going around. But, there are reasons why people are asking questions, and you can see how The Regime reacts to facts that provoke questions to The Official Regime Narrative -- they hide the facts.

Which is, of course, the main reason people don't believe anything The Regime says and are forced, like Kremlinologists, to speculate about what's really going on inside the Kremlin based on the tenor and flavor of the lies they're telling today.

By the way, it's officially Illegal to speculate baselessly about a Democrat. You can, of course, speculate baselessly about a Republican -- Trump paid prostitutes to go pee-pee; Trump had those documents at Mar-a-Lago because he planned to sell them to the highest bidder among hostile foreign regimes (a real claim made by lefties on Twitter, which was not accompanied by a Twitter "fact" check) -- so if you are going to speculate baselessly, use the name of a Republican instead of P.P. here. Call him "Jeb!" or something.

That will make everything Regime Compliant (TM).

Update! NBC now "clarifies" that they're suppressing the report because it did not meet "NBC 'News' reporting standards," by which they mean: It does not further the Democrats' political agenda or electoral chances.

I denounce... whatever Election Denialist Mega MAGA extremely extreme extremist who created this toxic meme of Russian disinformation.

It is only the credentialed liars of the corporate propaganda media who are educated and intelligent enough to speculate beyond the officially-claimed facts -- everyone else is required to only repeat the officially-claimed facts, or the evidence-free speculations and rumors "reported" by our Enlightened News Professionals.

Remember, you're permitted -- encouraged, actually -- to say things like "Rand Paul's neighbor was right," as Paul Pelosi's daughter said, but you're not allowed to ever speculate about a Democrat's unfortunate encounter with a "neighbor."

I think it really was a break in for the simple fact that the glass door was smashed in. I doubt very much it was "faked" after the fact. Who would have done that? Not Jeb!, who was beaten almost to death.

So who then? The cops? Are they *that* invested in Jeb! that they're going to start counterfeiting a crime scene before they even know what or why they're covering anything up?

It's a lot like my objection to those who claimed the cops "framed OJ:" how could they even know they could frame OJ minutes after the murder? How could they run the risk that the real murderer wouldn't just turn up walking down the street, bloody knife in hand, and high on crack?

And then their "framing of OJ" would look pretty damn suspicious, wouldn't it?

So I don't know how cops suddenly act together, each agreeing that "we must fake this crime scene to make it appear the attacker broke his way in," without even knowing there's something in need of being covered up here. This all happened within moments of the attack. How could they act that quickly and in mutual agreement about a major crime (faking evidence) when they didn't even know if there was any reason to fake evidence at all?

That said, the way you answer questions is by... answering questions, not by attempting to shout down and smear anyone asking the questions.

posted by Ace at 01:18 PM

| Access Comments