Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support





























































OH, NO: DEFENSE ASKS FOR A MISTRIAL -- WITHOUT PREJUDICE | Main | PolitiFact Issued a False Fact Check and Got a True Post about the Legality of Kyle's Gun Censored.
Now It Refuses to Correct.
November 17, 2021

Defense Moves for a Mistrial -- Without Prejudice

New thread.

videoqualityglitch.jpg

"Without prejudice" means a new trial. They base this on not having the best quality video. They say they would have prepared their defense differently.

This could just be setting up an "in case" situation if Rittenhouse is found guilty.

But this also means the defense thinks that Rittenhouse will be convicted.

If the prosecution agrees to this, then the judge is likely to grant a new trial. I suppose the judge COULD, MAYBE deny the motion, but it's hard if both defense and prosecution agree.

Prosecution opposes -- because they think that the jury, by asking to see the "raises gun" video, is thinking about convicting.

I disagree with that, actually. When a jury wants to see something, sometimes it's just to clear their last doubts. The OJ jury wanted to review the testimony of the chauffeur who said that he kept ringing OJ's doorbell and OJ didn't answer for a half hour (because he was showering after killing his wife), IIRC. People took that to mean they were going to convict. I, smartly, thought it meant they were reviewing it in order to dismiss it.

But this does not look good, my friends.

653 Is the judge trying to get a conviction so can be kicked to an appeals court so he can dodge responsibility? Because it sure does from here. Posted by: Beartooth

Yes. And that's what the prosecution wants. They will take a tainted conviction and chance the appeal over an acquittal. The appeal is someone else's problem.

The judge warns of a "reckoning" for the prosecution but he means on appeal. He warns "it could get ugly" but he means on appeal.

He doesn't want Joe Scarborough to say Mean Things about him!

BTW, the rumor is that the people who pushing for conviction are, as expected, the AWFLs (Affluent White Female Liberals). The worry that is hitting the defense is maybe that instead of being 9-3 of acquittals versus convictions, maybe it's split 3-9 acquittal vs. conviction. Robert Barnes says he doubts this last scenario.

Hung jury is looking likely. It would be the AWFLs requesting to see the video, or, who knows, the acquittal group requesting it to show the AWFLs that they're just wrong and that the video is Hocus Pocus Out of Focus.

The judge was completely wrong to let this bullshit "enhanced" video in, and he will not correct his error.

Appeals: appeals are made before an appeals court which is just judges not a court of laymen (citizens). They don't talk about the facts usually -- they accept the facts found by the trier of fact (the jury of the lower court) -- but about errors in law made by the judge of the lower court. If they find sufficient errors in law, they order a new trial.


If they also find that the facts are so overwhelming that no reasonable jury could convict, they will also just find for the defendant, but that is so rare it's hardly worth mentioning. It won't happen here.


Video here.


digg this
posted by Ace at 03:30 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Ben Had: "Waiter says there's no horsemeat today- That's OK ..."

kalel666: "Little known fact: the average Karen's snizz smell ..."

GnuBreed: "I've got a great sous vide recipe for uterus soup. ..."

18-1: "Are all "domesticated" foxes from that Russian exp ..."

runner: "Rangy dog appears in the open doorway. Posted by ..."

Taqiyyologist, Rickrolled by Jesus: "I've seen some vids of foxes that were more or les ..."

Bitter Clinger: "Interesting fact: The swan dive is named so aft ..."

Skip : "Should turn this off, been up last 2 days at 3am. ..."

Bertram Cabot, Jr.: "Can otters ride a unicycle? ..."

wth: "I don't see any polar bears.. GLOBAL WARMING ..."

gourmand du jour: "A pirate ship appeared on the horizon... ..."

Ben Had: "Duncanthrax, you just said that to someone that is ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64