Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« National Divorce: A Solution Attracting More and More Support | Main | Open Borders Fallout - Tejano South Texas Is Abandoning The Democrats »
October 01, 2021

What You Notice By Looking In The Wrong Place: The SAR Limit [Joe Mannix]

With the new (proposed, at the time of writing) $600 electronic transaction reporting threshold the IRS is planning as a part of new legislation, many have brought up the outrageous assumptions and problems with the scheme: the fact that it’s a panopticon, the fact that it represents an egregious violation of privacy, the fact that it will require gigantic expansions in the federal workforce, etc. It has also, as is perfectly reasonable, brought up the “$10,000 IRS reporting limit” as it exists today, and how it is different from what is being proposed.

That $10,000 limit is called the SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) limit. It was enabled by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) in 1970. The purpose of the BSA was to prevent money laundering, and included a lot more than the SAR provisions. It is also the source of various “know your customer” laws and requirements for banks. When the BSA was passed, the SAR was set at $10,000 and it is still, fifty years later, the same $10,000. It requires cash transactions above that limit to be reported to the IRS.

When the comparison between the SAR and the new $600 electronic reporting thresholds started, it got me to thinking: how big is the SAR and more importantly, how big was the SAR? To answer that, we can look in a few dimensions. I chose three of those and something interesting surfaced. For what it is worth, both 1970 and 2020 were recession years.


I chose the FDIC limit, median household income and per-capita GDP.
• FDIC Limit (per FDIC)
1970: $20,000
2020: $250,000
• Median household income (per Census Bureau; FRED/St. Louis Fed)
1970: $9,870
2020: $67,521
• Per-capita GDP (per FRED/St. Louis Fed)
◦ 1970: $5,233
◦ 2020: $63,285

So, how big is the SAR limit then and now? How big should the SAR limit be if it had kept pace? It’s pretty astounding, and it shows some interesting large economic disconnects of which we’re all intuitively aware.
• SAR limit in terms of FDIC Limit
◦ 1970: 50%
◦ 2020: 4%
▪ The SAR limit, if it kept pace with FDIC limits: $125,000
• SAR limit in terms of median household income
◦ 1970: 101.3%
◦ 2020: 14.8%
▪ The SAR limit, if it had kept pace with median income: $68,410
• SAR limit in terms of per-capita GDP
◦ 1970: 191%
◦ 2020: 15.8%
▪ The SAR limit, if it had kept pace with per-capita GDP: $120,934

So what can we learn from this exercise? First, the SAR limit is laughably small already and it really gives some perspective to $600. It should be, depending on which measure you choose, at least 7x bigger than it is and perhaps as much as 13x bigger than it is (assuming, of course, that you think it should exist at all). The specifics may be interesting, but this isn’t very important because everyone knows it is laughably small and thus dishonest.

More interesting in my mind is what it implies about the wider economy, which I wouldn’t have noticed if not for doing this exercise. The FDIC limit, as it turns out, more or less has kept pace with GDP growth. That is somewhat surprising. Household income has not. Inflation, as we have been lamenting off and on for decades is very real indeed, and we can see it bright as day. You used to be able to take out more than the median income before hitting the limit. Now it is a mere 15%. That’s your inflation, and it’s astounding.

But even more astounding is the direct comparison between median household income and per-capita GDP in same-year nominal terms. In 1970, the median household income was 188.6% of per-capita GDP. In 2020, it was just 106.7%. The overall share of GDP represented by median income has collapsed. This, right here, is your middle-class squeeze - the declining relative income of most households even as the economy has soared for half a century. On average each year, incomes fall against the gross size of the economy. Want your middle-class squeeze? Want your income inequality? Here it is, in all it’s staggering glory. Want to know why (other than social considerations) women were able and then more or less compelled to enter the workforce? Here it is: households needed the money.

This also puts some additional perspective on America’s last gasp from 2017-2019. The Trump era, for the first time in decades, saw median household incomes grow against the wider economy. The middle class and especially the working class started doing materially better for the first time in living memory. And now it is over, and we are back to the original status quo. The only difference is that now it is on steroids.

digg this
posted by Open Blogger at 03:32 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b]: "'Bout time for me to shave and shower. We are sup ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: Ciampino - Zap Zap at December 05, 2024 ..."

FenelonSpoke: "I didn't know this song, but I like it: "No more n ..."

Ciampino - Zap Zap: "23 Posted by: FenelonSpoke at December 05, 2024 0 ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "Also, support for Windows 10 will end next week. ..."

free amatuer cams: "Long affiliated with lower pay out and a regular t ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Genesis 25:32 Faith based decisions . Reflectio ..."

free Home video porn: "A selection of protected-sexual intercourse proced ..."

IRONGRAMPA: "Good morning, good people, from the Adirondacks, r ..."

Notorious BFD: "G'nite, everybody. Much love to you all. ..."

Pixy Misa: "Found some cheese and some news. The day us saved ..."

Full Sex Hd Video: "There are hundreds of particular genres to pick ou ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64