Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups






















« Saturday Afternoon Chess Thread 06-05-2021 | Main | Saturday Overnight Open Thread (6/5/21) I'm Lazy Edition »
June 05, 2021

"Non-judgmentalism" by Your Raving Roving Science Correspondent [Jay Guevara]

judgement33.jpg

Rome existed as a republic and then as an empire for 700 years, in no small measure because of virtues espoused by Roman culture. In fairness, Romans did not uniformly cleave unto those virtues, but that doesn't matter: they held up those virtues as ideals to which all Romans should strive, and which was the basis of Rome's success.

What were those virtues? The personal (as opposed to the public) ones were:

  • Auctoritas "Spiritual Authority" The sense of one's social standing, built up through experience, Pietas, and Industria.
  • "Humour" Ease of manner, courtesy, openness, and friendliness.
  • "Mercy" Mildness and gentleness.
  • "Dignity" A sense of self-worth, personal pride.
  • "Tenacity" Strength of mind, the ability to stick to one's purpose.
  • "Frugalness" Economy and simplicity of style, without being miserly.
  • Gravitas "Gravity" A sense of the importance of the matter at hand, responsibility and earnestness.
  • "Respectibility" The image that one presents as a respectable member of society.
  • "Humanity" Refinement, civilization, learning, and being cultured.
  • "Industriousness" Hard work.
  • "Dutifulness" More than religious piety; a respect for the natural order socially, politically, and religiously. Includes the ideas of patriotism and devotion to others.
  • "Prudence" Foresight, wisdom, and personal discretion.
  • Salubritas "Wholesomeness" Health and cleanliness.
  • "Sternness" Gravity, self-control.
  • "Truthfulness" Honesty in dealing with others.


A sobering list for us, isn't it? Every one of those virtues is now more honored in the breach than observance in our society. Our report card would be a solid "F." In the place of these (real) virtues, we have substituted (much against the will of the AoS readership, I know) the pathetically meretricious weak sauce "virtues" of "diversity, inclusion, and equity" (i.e., D.I.E.). Indeed, espousing any of the Roman virtues would be an excellent way to be "canceled" as a racist, sexist, homophobic, [insert other slurs here to taste] member or fellow traveler of the oppressive white patriarchy.

But D.I.E. are secondary virtues in our society now. The Ur-virtue in 21st century America, from which all the others derive, is "non-judgmentalism." On its face non-judgmentalism is ridiculous. Adults render judgment every day. "This is good, that's bad, this in between." We hold elections which used to be a poll of the judgment of the electorate (now being reduced to a poll of the judgment of Dominion, but never mind; a judgment is still rendered).

Yet the highest virtue of the soi-disant "progressives" is bleating about being non-judgmental, while on the same breath excoriating in the vilest terms anyone and everyone who does not uniformly share every one of their opinions. Apparently that doesn't count in the Non-judgmentalism Derby. For example, as Jonathan Turley reports, recently Dr. Aruna Khilanani spoke at the Yale School of Medicine, where she imparted this little nugget of non-judgmentalism:

Khilanani then gives a chilling observation. After noting that she stopped watching news because it upset her too much, she noted “I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a f–king favor.

She seems nice.

Turley also cites a seminary professor who prayed for God to help him hate white people, and others who advocated
detonating white people,” denouncing police, calling for Republicans to suffer, strangling police officers, celebrating the death of conservatives, calling for the killing of Trump supporters, supporting the murder of conservative protesters and other outrageous statements.

all of which sound just a tad on the judgmental side (not to mention the psychopathic side).
The estimable Theodore Dalrymple has written extensively (and with an erudition I could only dream of approaching) on non-judgmentalism

Whence comes this non-judgmentalism? And to what purpose? Comparison of the Prime Directive of "progressive" thought (pardon the oxymoron) with the Roman virtues listed above suggests that non-judgmentalism was consciously promulgated to undermine Western culture generally and American culture in particular.

Consider, for example, the treatment of vagrants today with that of vagrants of yesteryear, where they were reviled and shunned. Today anyone addressing the vagrancy problem in public will invariably preface his comments with a bow toward "compassion" and "humanity." Society is blamed for all individual faults and failings. Didn't succeed at something? Society prevented you from succeeding. Became addicted to drugs? Committed a crime? Society made you do it. It's as though the philosopher of our time is jailed con man Kevin Trudeau, whose tagline used to be "it ain't your fault," and who asserted to the faithful that their problems or shortcomings arose because "they" had stacked the deck against the faithful, and they/society was to blame. Oddly, however, if the faithful succeeded at something, that was 100% their doing, and they/society had nothing to do with it.

Any suggestion that an individual has any responsibility whatsoever for his faults and problems is castigated as "blaming the victim."

It's a fundamentally unhealthy and pernicious perspective that resonates with people of poor character, because it excuses them from blame and the need to take a personal inventory and assume responsibility for their own lives. It's a perspective that is now widely extant, and one that has as its centerpiece the doctrine of non-judgmentalism.





Recent Comments
[i]Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM)[/b][/i][/s][/u]: " James Earl Carter was a meddlesome twat ... The ..."

scampydog: "June Lockhart in Lassie. What the hell is wrong ..."

Citizen Cake: ">>>The natural gas thing was among the regionally ..."

SMOD: "On July 15, 1979, then president Jimmy Carter went ..."

blake - semi lurker in marginal standing (tT6L1): "Young gals in pj's at the store I sort of get. Guy ..."

The ARC of History!: "[i]What kind of mean shit can the executive branch ..."

Thomas Bender: "@311 >>For details, see the Law & Order episode ..."

TheJamesMadison, trying to figure out Joel Schumacher: "332 Decency, yet Biden fingerbanged a staffer. Po ..."

naturalfake: "[i]Airline deregulation gave us people wearing paj ..."

Quarter Twenty : "268 Why do I suspect Biden's "eulogy" will involve ..."

eleven: "They'll try to rub the Carter funeral ball sack i ..."

Sponge - F*ck Joe Biden: "Decency, yet Biden fingerbanged a staffer. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64