Conservative Group Releases "Confidential" Report on Sundown Joe's Shortlist of Supreme Court Nominees

Earlier today Trump mentioned Stacy Abrams being near the top of Sundown's list. He might have gotten it from this Article III Project report.

Sundown Joe is actually refusing to release his list of Supreme Court picks, surely because they're all radicals and all suspiciously Diverse.

This list is assembled from the names put forward by professional Democrats, leftwing 501(c)(3) organizations, and media reports about who Sundown is considering.

Sundown Joe hasn't released the names on this list -- he refuses to name any names -- but the Article III Project isn't just making this stuff up. All of these names have been put forward by members of the Inner Party.

The entries are amusingly written. I recommend giving it a twice-over.

Meanwhile, a group of hardcore Democrat activists pretending to be a nonpartisan professional society says that we must not allow a Supreme Court nomination so close to an election:

Would you be terribly shocked to learn that this rabidly partisan political front group masquerading as a nonpartisan professional organization said the exact opposite when Obama was trying to fill Scalia's seat in in 2016?

Would you be stunned to hear that brain-damaged madwoman and habitual drunkard Hillary Clinton demanded a Supreme Court justice been appointed in the election year of 2016?

If you watched Fox News on Friday, you heard several hundred tributes to the "great American" and "trailblazer" Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Would it surprise you to learn that the leftist outlets feel no such corresponding obligation to praise their enemies upon their deaths?

Would you say that if one group can command courtesies and tributes from another group, but that second group cannot reciprocally demand courtesies and tributes, what we have on our hands is a Caste system of Lords and Commoners?

Would you say you are sick and tired of our alleged representatives reifying and confirming this Jim Crow system by continuing to offer praise to the left when the left is quite open about wanting to formally enslave us?

Republicans always offer these courtesies, Chrissy. It's your own party that sings "Ding Dong the Witch is Dead."

Would you be shocked to learn that borderline-developmentally-disabled communist Donkey-Chompers is all in on the "dead woman's last wish" line?

Would you be further distressed to learn that rabid partisan and Female-Identifying Thumb Clare McCaskill is also attempting an emotional blackmail line, stating that her daughter (who is fully an adult ) cried upon hearing that Trump was replacing RGB?

This is an adult, not a #Woke8YearOld. What are we supposed to make of this? Are we supposed to sacrifice our values to keep this #Woke20YearOld from having an acute case of crybabitis?

Would it further cause you psychological befuckery to learn that swishy manlet George Stephanopolous confessed that his wife and daughters all sat in the car blubbering about RGB?

93 Holy jumping cats.

George Stephanopoulos' wife told Kelly Ripa that she, George, and their two daughters sat in their car and cried for 45 minutes over the death of RBG.

You'd have to have a heart of stone not to laugh your ass off.
Posted by: Jane D'Oh

Would it blow your fucking minds to hear that Dave Wiegel, a fake libertarian who was once the "conservative" reporter covering the conservative movement for the Washington Post (he was replaced by... Jen Rubin!), "reports" that until now, Democrats have not been "angry and organized" about Supreme Court nominations, but, fingers crossed!, maybe they'll finally start playing hardball?

Would you be befuddled and confounded to learn that a media liberal colleague of Dave Weigel threatened "more and bigger riots" if the Democrats are not permitted to stop this nomination?

And -- uh oh. We just got wind of new stirrings in Blowsey-Ford's Indelible Hippocampus:

Would it surprise you if this happened for real? Or would you just say, "Oh yes, of course"?

Some people did something about an ad:

Michael Malice makes a good point that I've long made myself.

The left has captured almost every taste-making, norms-creating, rules-enforcing institution in America.

This gives them a great advantage in that it's always their approval people must seek, if they seek approval from any institution at all.

But these institutions no longer represent excellence, or accomplishment, or virtue, or intelligence. They're just hardcore partisan shill organizations wearing the skin-suits of organizations that formerly had some bipartisan credibility.

Now they're saying: Do what we say, and maybe we'll show 8% less hatred and contempt for you. Maybe.

And they still expect this to work!

And sadly, it still will work with the Yuppie Karens (of both the male and female variety) who have sought Teacher's Approval in the form of Gold Stars all their lives, and would not know what to do with themselves if there was not some Prestige Institution out there that they could suck up to and give apples to.

The big split in what we formerly called the conservative movement is between the people who Know What Time It Is, and know that the approval of corrupted, vicious institutions is not worth having, and those who are still living in 2003 and cannot even imagine saying "I don't need the approval of these monsters, the approval of my family and friends and my own conscience is enough."

posted by Ace at 03:00 PM

| Access Comments