Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















Mid-Morning Art Thread | Main | Sort Of Almost Working
June 19, 2020

The Morning Rant

talking ape.jpg

Another day, another SCOTUS betrayal. I am in a bad mood. I am about ready to write off our 30-year experiment to install constitutionalist judges as pretty much a waste of time.

Yes, I know plenty of decent judges have been appointed to the lower case, and I have been pleasantly surprised to read some hair-on-fire panic pieces in Slate and HuffPo about how Cocaine Mitch is confirming Trump's judicial appointments at an "alarming" rate. While I always enjoy progressives discomfited, I don't think they need to worry all that much. Because when they really, really want something, once they pust it to the SCOTUS level, they're pretty much assured of getting it.

And when they get what they want, whatever it is (Obergefell v. Hodges, Roe v. Wade), then the decision is set in stone, and precedent forever. Yay stare decisis.

This is true even in obvious bad decisions. I've even heard some liberals complain about how poorly Roe v. Wade was decided, not that they're disappointed with the outcome, but they can see the bad arguments. With that plus the advances in neonatology, you'd think that Roe v. Wade would be ripe for a revisit. But no, nobody seems to want to challenge it and so I doubt I will see any substantive challenge to it in my lifetime.

BAnd on the rare instances where the progressives lose (Masterpiece Cake v. Colorado), it is always decided on the narrowest grounds, leaving open endless possibilities for relitigatation, so much so that SCOTUS might just as well announce "THIS DECISION IS FOR THIS ONE INSTANCE ONLY AND CAN NEVER BE USED ANYWHERE ELSE FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER."

One aspect of the problem is that the terms 'progressive' and 'conservative' aren't quite symmetric terms. That is, the progressive agenda is fairly easy to define, i.e. anything that advances identity politics, more centalized government, and pisses on traditional moral values. But with conservatives, there's a lot of difference between the libertarians, the neocons, the socons, the CoC "country club" Republicans, so when we say we need more "conservative" judges, that word can havee different meanings.

Another aspect of this inherent asymmetry how the confirmation process plays out for both sides: Progressive candidates don't seem to have any problem telling the senate who they are and how they're going to vote, and usually the confirmation votes are pretty lopsided, like they used to be. On the other hand judges nominated by the GOP suddenly have to clam up and turn into stealth candidates to avoid being borked by the Democrats' allies in the hair-on-fire media. There's never any melodrama at the confirmation hearings for any Dem nomination, no matter how loony left they are, and so pretty much sail on through while GOP nomination hearings routinely get turned into shit shows.

And the DACA decision, which basically says it's OK for Obama to issue an EO but not OK for Trump to rescind it, is truly bizarre.

Again, I wonder whether it's all been worth it. Politics is downstream from culture, and we've been fighting this political battle for decades, and then suddenly a GOP nominated "originalist" decides to change the definition of a word to something not originally intended by the authors of the regulation in question.

Against these Alice-through-the-looking-glass inanities, there is no defense.



Stunning *And* Brave:




Wait, Isn't This Supposed To Be An "Autonomous" Zone?

chaz supplies needed 01.jpg



😂

chaz 20200619 01.jpg




masked looting 20200619.jpg



America Invented Slavery:



...And the Death Penalty:




riots 20200619 02.jpg

talking ape  03.jpg
"Flunk history we much?"




progressives ruin everything 20200619.jpg



See How Fast It Goes Sideways:



Who Dis:

who dis 20200619a1.jpg

Photo 2
Photo 3
Photo 4
Photo 5
Photo 6



For the 'Ettes:

who dis 20200619b1.jpg

Photo 2
Photo 3
Photo 4


Wednesday's who dis: I think Connie Sellecca must be an 'ette. Because, according to her imdb entry, when she was married to Gil Gerard, she was fond of playing bizarre practical jokes, usually involving faking her own suicide or death. Gerard reportedly got so used to coming home and finding her lying in a pool of fake blood that he developed a critiquing system for her pranks. She's been married to John Tesh since 1992 and I have to wonder if she's kept up the jokes. Ms. Selleca appeared with the ex-Mr. Jan Smithers and now current Mr. Barbara Streisand, AKA James Brolin, in the trashtastic prime time soap opera series Hotel.



Today's Edition Of The Morning Rant Is Brought To You By Loaded M&M Oreo Cookie Bars:

oreo mm cookie bars 01.jpg

Cookie Bar recipe here.

digg this
posted by OregonMuse at 11:14 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
fd: "The hacking group responsible for taking down Fult ..."

Don Black: "☕ is ready ..."

MAGA_Ken: "I bet Jenna Ellis and the other retards that coppe ..."

[/i][/b][/s][/u]I used to have a different nic: "Good morning horde! ..."

Warai-otoko : "If the junta had any sense, they'd make a big disg ..."

logprof: "I was discharged Friday but since then instead of ..."

Eeyore: "It's a bit early to sing "Ding Dong the Mitch is d ..."

San Franpsycho: "Eek, within half an hour of exactly one week since ..."

Heirloominati: "Good to see you back in form JJ. And a Leap Year ..."

Martini Farmer: "Yonder Horde Disqualification.... word of the y ..."

rhennigantx: "Happy Leap Day ..."

fd: "Here's a handy tip for you backpack wearers. To pr ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64