Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« Twitter Hires Disgraced FBI Lawyer James Baker, Key Actor in Coup Attempt | Main | Why Are Rick Wilson and His "Wife" Posting White Supremacist Iconography? »
June 16, 2020

NBC Goes After The Federalist, Demanding that Google (The Monopolist in Internet-Served Ads) No Longer Permit Advertisers to Advertise On It;
Google Eagerly Agrees

Update: the leftwing censorship group that pitched "Let's deplatform The Federalist to NBC" has a long, long list of right wing sites that need to be deplatformed.

Pretty much all of them.

Except for National Review, The Bulwark, and The Dispatch.

Who will soon win the ideological war on the right -- because they're the only three sites the leftwing tech monopolists have left standing.



The regular media and social media have been playing this game for a long, long time.

A leftwing activist brings a "problematic" comment to the attention of a media organization, inducing the media organization to begin putting pressure on a social media company to censor/suppress/deplatform the speaker.

This organization has often been CNN -- which has its own Deplatforming Unit working on no other stories except bird-dogging candidates for censorship to the Social Media Monopoly Hunters.

The media organization keeps up a campaign of negative PR on the social media company-- "Why is Twitter permitting Alex Jones to tweet?" -- until the social media company agrees to deplatform.

The media pretends that this is just "news gathering," "just asking questions," but that's a lie: they have a specific end in mind. They have a specific last paragraph of the story in mind: the person or site that they're targeting succumbs to CNN's negative PR pressure and deplatforms the target.

You can tell that the media seeks this goal because the negative stories stop the moment the deplatorming demand is agreed to: they do not go on, for example, to do a story about how Twitter gave in to cancel culture activists and thereby reduced free speech. That's a story they could write after a cancelation -- but they don't.

Because the game is that all negative PR will stop once you abide by CNN's decision that this person or this website no longer be permitted to speak freely.

Now leftwingers have gone after The Federalist for -- get this! -- Criticizing the media.

NBC wrote a story and demanded that Google do something about Google ads appearing on The Federalist.

"The Federalist published an article claiming the media had been lying about looting and violence during the protests, which were both included in the report sent to Google."

We can't have people on the right criticizing the media! That must not be permitted!

One of the outlets The Federalist criticized was, of course, NBC "News."

And now Google has given NBC the last paragraph of their story: The Federalist is now blacklisted from advertising with Google.

The monopolist that controls 90%+ of the internet advertising market.

I'm sure that won't reduce The Federalist's reach.

I'm sure the entire point of this exercise wasn't to reduce the Federalist's reach.

And National Review -- which takes Cash Money Donations from Google through the National Review Institute -- will be completely silent about their patron's destruction of yet another conservative voice (one that is, coincidentally, an ideological and market competitor to National Review), or, if forced to address this, will defend Google's deplatorming of a conservative rival as a Corporate Monopoly just using its own right to free speech.

I'm so sick of this. I'm sick of this.

Andrew Egger of the Dispatch -- one of the many pseudoright grifters who has been telling the right that "corporations can do whatever they want" and advising us to "let the market solve the problem" in, oh, say, 60-100 years -- is actually shocked by this.

Dude, they've been doing this forever. We've been telling you that the target was not Alex Jones.

Alex Jones was not their target. Alex Jones was their Proof of Concept.

Alex Jones was the first to be targeted for deplatforming because they knew that cucks like you would say nothing, thereby blessing the precendent.

Thereby validating their model of just deplatforming all right wing voices.

Is this shocking?

Where have you been?

Meawnwhile, this alleged "free speech advocate" is now teeing up the next deplatofrming target: Ben Shapiro.

Well, I intend to give Ben Shapiro the same level of support during his deplatorming as he's given every other conservative who's been deplatformed: None at all.

Hey Ben, "freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences."

"Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you can compel a monopoly to serve you with the same terms they serve everyone else."

"Natural market foces will solve this problem in 60-100 years. Hopefully."

I hope these words bring you solace as YouTube bans your channel and Google (which controls 90%+ of all internet advertising in the world) denies you advertising revenue.

Oh, update: The Federalist "may rememdy" and avoid demonitization.

I assume -- by deleting the articles which criticized the media and the protesters.

Can't wait for Charles C.W. Cooke's impassioned defense of his donor deplatforming yet antoher conservative voice that competes with National Review.

Update: Well, Baseball C*ck has sputtered on Twitter, which I suppose is something.

But what will they actually do about it? Will they advocate that a 90%+ market dominator (which is well above the threshhold to be declared a "monopoly" in a market) be sued by the Federal Government's anti-trust division until they agree to stop the illegal practice of "tying" or "leveraging," that is, using your monopoly power in one area (internet advertising) to control/reduce competition in another market (internet political publications)?

I doubt it. I expect more stalwart defenses of the Poor Little Megacorporatin Monopoly Google, and advice that anyone who doesn't like Google deplaforming everyone on the right (except the Pet Kitten Pseudoright), should just wait for "natural market forces" to produce a viable competitor to Google.

In 60-100 years. Maybe.

Until then... well you can just eat fucking sand, can't you?

Interesting point: If Google is deplatforming The Federalist over comments... doesn't that mean they're treating The Federalist's comments are as the work of a publisher, not just independent comments on a platform?

digg this
posted by Ace at 04:50 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
runner: "top 5! ..."

Oldcat: "I have a different view: this is probably prelude ..."

Skip: "There once was the Duke of Sussex He was lead by ..."

I am the Shadout Mapes, Royal Marketing Consultant: "Top of the post, ma! ..."

Tom Servo: "By all early accounts, Speaker Johnson stood stron ..."

[/i][/b]andycanuck (2yu8s)[/s][/u]: "Map here: Disclose.tv @disclosetv 9h JUST IN - B ..."

mnw: "Putin intends to envelop Moldova in a warm, embrac ..."

whig: "I used to play as a teenager a game on the War of ..."

I am the Shadout Mapes, Royal Marketing Consultant: "Nood. ..."

Jordan61: "Now I’m second guessing myself, did Charles ..."

JROD: "I thought the royals were nothing more than a tour ..."

Alizarin Crimson: "His uncle and father divorced so no big deal. ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64