Obergefell Is At It Again, With A Particularly Nonsensical Argument

Judicial activism is one of the foundations of the progressive method of societal destruction, and gay marriage is perhaps their biggest success. Inventing rights and then finding compliant judges to create legal justification for them is a tried and true technique, and one that has done incalculable damage to our republic. Gay authoritarianism

Jim Obergefell is the successful plaintiff in the case where the Supreme Court invented a constitutional right to same sex marriage. Eric Murphy is a lawyer who, in his capacity as Solicitor General of Ohio, argued against inventing such a right.

President Trump has nominated Murphy for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Sen. Rob Portman, one of Murphy’s home state Senators, backs the nomination, even though Portman supports same sex marriage.

The Washington Post has published an op-ed by Obergefell blasting Murphy and criticizing Portman for supporting him. The op-ed displays ignorance and arrogance in equal measure.

According to Obergefell, Murphy “argued that my marriage was unconstitutional.” Murphy made no such argument.

But that was never the purpose, because the goal of these activists was not homosexual marriage...it was, as is so obvious...the destruction of one of the underpinnings of Judeo-Christian society.

&topic=world_news"> posted by CBD at 03:00 PM

| Access Comments