ę Tucker Carlson: A Former Senior Operative at the Podesta Group Came Forward to Tell Us That There Was Russian Collusion -- But with the Podesta Group and the Hillary Clinton Camp, Not Trump | Main | Report: Bill Clinton Ditched Secret Service Protective Detail Multiple Times to Take the Lolita Express to Pedo Isle Ľ
October 25, 2017

#FusionCollusion: 10 Facts About the Steele Dossier That Liberal Reporters Must Finally Acquaint Themselves With

Actually, they probably are acquainted with much of this. The problem is, they're all great chums of FusionGPS head Glenn Simpson, as Mollie Hemingway notes, and perhaps are compromised as far as reporting the whole truth about the information op their buddy ran against Trump on behalf of Hillary Clinton (and perhaps a foreign client to be named later...?).

7) Fusion GPS' ties to media are problematic

The principals at Fusion GPS are well connected to mainstream media reporters. They are former journalists themselves, and know how to package stories and provide information to push narratives. They are, in fact, close friends with some of the top reporters who have covered the Russia-Trump collusion story.

Fusion GPS has placed stories with friendly reporters while fighting Congressional investigatorsí attempts to find out the groupís sources of funding. Fusion GPS leaders have taken the 5th and fought subpoenas for information about the group's involvement with Russia. Their close friendships with key reporters on these stories have paid huge dividends for the firm, although these friendships and cooperative relationships have not served the public well.


Fusion GPS was responsible for the dossier. But the group's larger narrative push to reporters is even more influential, and a difficult story to unpack due to defensiveness, embarrassment, and outright media complicity.

Have any of the people working on this recused themselves from reporting on it due to their compromised position with respect to their great friend Glenn Simpson? Or have they decided to chuck that part of journalistic ethics out the window, too?

Must read piece that re-capitulates the most important points about this affair.

There's so much in here (all ten points, actually) worth excerpting, but I'll just quote one more: My old hobbyhorse.

Why did Comey "brief" Trump on the dossier?

As I've long suggested: This was a fake briefing to give the dossier a "news hook" so that CNN could and would report it. The dossier was unverified, which is why no one would touch it; but then Comey "briefed" Trump about it, giving CNN an excuse to talk about a document which was itself unverified and in places provably false.

Was this entire point of the briefing? Just so Comey and Clapper could get CNN to report on this?

8) Jim Comey personally briefed Trump on the dossier, shortly before CNN reported it

As confirmed by the Washington Post, the Russia-Trump collusion narrative was a Clinton campaign political operation. The dossier itself was shopped around by Fusion GPS a year ago to the New York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo News, the New Yorker, and CNN, according to lawyers for the ex-spy who worked on the dossier. The dossier was so unverifiable that the only reporter to bite was from Mother Jones.

What really got the ball rolling on the last year's Russia-Trump conspiracy theory, then, was not the dossier itself but the briefing of it by Obama intelligence chiefs to President-elect Trump in January. Jim Comey admitted under oath that DNI Clapper asked him to personally brief President Trump about this dossier. The fact of that meeting was quickly leaked to CNN.

Given the dossier's many problems, was the entire purpose of the meeting to produce the leak that the meeting happened? No one was biting on the dossier and it needed legitimization by opponents of Trump. If the dossier was so shoddy that it was debunked in hours after BuzzFeed posted it in all its salacious glory, why brief the president and president-elect on it, much less leak it? What was the real purpose of that meeting, and that leak to CNN?

Someone on Twitter, I think Sean Davis, asked: Did Comey tell Trump that the dossier itself came from Hillary Clinton's camp? If not, why not?

I'll answer his question for him: No, Comey hid this from Trump.

I'm 99.99% sure of that. How am I sure of it?

Because if Comey had told Trump "This dossier came from a rival candidate's oppo research efforts," is it even faintly plausible Trump would have refrained from Tweeting that out immediately?!

No, that's not plausible.

So Comey "briefed" the president without telling him it was a Clinton document.

Here's why I speculate he withheld that:

Precisely because he didn't want the planned leak to CNN to be tainted by the "Clinton paid for this garbage" storyline. He wanted the leak out there standing on its own. So he deliberately withheld highly-relevant information from the president he was supposedly "briefing" so that he could have all important knowledge about a dossier he claimed was important.

Comey has previously shown a low animal cunning when it comes to planting stories in the press.

Was this entire "briefing" of Trump a fiction to conceal its real purpose, which was to "brief" CNN with a document that was otherwise untouchable?

All signs point to Yes.

Investigate. Appoint a special counsel.

Update: Earlier, Jake Tapper claimed another reporter was "correct" to say the "Russian dossier' started as Republican funded effort. Sean Davis quickly corrected him, saying, No, the Republican-funded file was about Trump's business interests, and that effort went nowhere (and I'm not sure that even was Republican funded-- no on-the-record source for that); the Russia part of the FusionCollusion only began when Hillary and the DNC started paying Fusion.

Jake Tapper then began a series of angry tweets telling Sean Davis why his apple was really a banana and even though he was wrong, in a Bigger Sense, he was right.

Anyway, Tapper then said something snarky like "I hope you'll apply the same standards at The Federalist."

Sean Davis replied:

Yes, about that.

Evan Perez has been on the byline of just about every story CNN has run about the "Russia Collusion." These stories feature "sources" with knowledge of the dossier.

Would it surprise you terribly to hear that Evan Perez, who reports on Fusion's files, and Glenn Simpson, who created Fusion's files, used to write a heck of a lot of stories together, sharing a byline at the Wall Street Journal a whole heck of alot?

Is Evan Perez a friend of Simpson's? Is he a close friend? If he is, why is he acting as a reporter on a story he's compromised on, rather than directing Glenn Simpson to talk to a non-compromised-by-friendship reporter at CNN?

Is that why CNN speaks no evil about FusionGPS and Glenn Simpson?

Is that ethical?

Is the rule that you shouldn't play "objective reporter" about a source you're close to now a Banana Rule and no longer an Apple Rule?

digg this
posted by Ace at 02:00 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Huck Follywood: "I hope someone can mash up the Olbermann video wit ..."

Chuck Martel: "Just started posting - thought I'd introduce mysel ..."

f'd: "What kind of notes did that kid have on his parent ..."

browndog Official Mascot of Team Gizzard: "389 I confess I like the remake of The Italian Job ..."

steevy: "Of course the McCabe thing is enraging but I won't ..."

Skip : "Anyone else think if it's %36 it's really %18? ..."

steevy: "I think Daphne Zuniga is the one that went lesbo. ..."

Huck Follywood: "I'm sending that wart hog video to about ten peopl ..."

Working for Peanuts: "[i]A Bridge Too Far has an amazing cast. Man there ..."

Caliban: "My favorite thing about Bully Olbermann is the way ..."

steevy: "412 Oh, it is some other 80's hottie that came out ..."

Blake - semi lurker at large: "So, a discussion about US debt came up, and someon ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64