« My Friends, You Have Nothing to Fear From Hillary's Googely-Goggely SpazzyEyes |
Main
|
Bloomberg "Reporter" To Hillary Clinton: Do You Fear the Russians Are Actually Behind this False-Flag Bombing to Try to Throw the Election to Trump? »
September 20, 2016
Must Read: The Intellectual-Yet-Idiot Class Can Barely Wipe Themselves After Shitting, Yet They Control Even the Most Intimate Parts of Our Lives
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of The Black Swan ( I haven't actually red the book, but the thesis is interesting and quickly understood in broad outline), seems to be a rather nasty traitor to his class of Intellectuals. (Though I'd imagine he'd say he's not among the class of "intellectuals" he's talking about.)
Coincidentally with this blog's own preoccupation, he keeps making an issue of the Medical Intellectual-Yet-Idiot class who told us to all stop eating fat and eat Healthy Energy-Boosting Carbohydrates instead.
One thing:
The Intellectual Yet Idiot
What we have been seeing worldwide, from India to the UK to the US, is the rebellion against the inner circle of no-skin-in-the-game policymaking
"clerks" and journalists-insiders, that class of paternalistic semi-intellectual experts with some Ivy league, Oxford-Cambridge, or similar label-driven education who are telling the rest of us 1) what to do, 2) what to eat, 3) how to speak, 4) how to think… and 5) who to vote for.
But the problem is the one-eyed following the blind: these self-described members of the "intelligenzi" can’t find a coconut in Coconut Island, meaning they aren't intelligent enough to define intelligence hence fall into circularities -- but their main skill is capacity to pass exams written by people like them. With psychology papers replicating less than 40%, dietary advice reversing after 30 years of fatphobia, macroeconomic analysis working worse than astrology, the appointment of Bernanke who was less than clueless of the risks, and pharmaceutical trials replicating at best only 1/3 of the time, people are perfectly entitled to rely on their own ancestral instinct and listen to their grandmothers (or Montaigne and such filtered classical knowledge) with a better track record than these policymaking goons.
Indeed one can see that these academico-bureaucrats who feel entitled to run our lives aren't even rigorous, whether in medical statistics or policymaking. They can't tell science from scientism — in fact in their eyes scientism looks more scientific than real science. (For instance it is trivial to show the following: much of what the Cass-Sunstein-Richard Thaler types — those who want to "nudge" us into some behavior — much of what they would classify as "rational" or "irrational" (or some such categories indicating deviation from a desired or prescribed protocol) comes from their misunderstanding of probability theory and cosmetic use of first-order models.)
...
The Intellectual Yet Idiot is a production of modernity hence has been accelerating since the mid twentieth century, to reach its local supremum today, along with the broad category of people without skin-in-the-game who have been invading many walks of life. Why? Simply, in most countries, the government's role is between five and ten times what it was a century ago (expressed in percentage of GDP). The IYI seems ubiquitous in our lives but is still a small minority and is rarely seen outside specialized outlets, think tanks, the media, and universities -- most people have proper jobs and there are not many openings for the IYI.
Beware the semi-erudite who thinks he is an erudite. He fails to naturally detect sophistry.
The IYI pathologizes others for doing things he doesn't understand without ever realizing it is his understanding that may be limited. He thinks people should act according to their best interests and he knows their interests, particularly if they are "red necks" or English non-crisp-vowel class who voted for Brexit. When plebeians do something that makes sense to them, but not to him, the IYI uses the term "uneducated". What we generally call participation in the political process, he calls by two distinct designations: "democracy" when it fits the IYI, and "populism" when the plebeians dare voting in a way that contradicts his preferences.
Okay I can't quote anymore because I'm coming all over myself.
He posted this GFY to the IYI's on twitter: