Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups


NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Registration Is Open!


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« AoSHQ Podcast #145: Kurt Schlichter | Main | Oceans 21: BJ Novak's Fake ID Was Much, Much Better Than Yours »
June 10, 2016

Poll: Exactly Half of Voters Found Trump's Judge Statements "Racist"

And yet nearly 100% of the media, the GOP establishment, and the conservative intellectual class found them "racist."

So what can we determine based on this?

Well, here are the possibilities:

1. That the media, the GOP establishment, and the conservative intellectual class are simply better -- smarter, more perceptive, more moral -- than the stupid fucking American voters they hover above on their gossamer thrones of cloudwisp and starshine.

2. That the media, GOP establishment, and conservative intellectual class share similar cultural/class inputs which lead them to think in exactly the same way, and the lack of intellectual diversity among them tends to make them miss things that other people know, and furthermore, their intellectual insularity -- forever talking only to each other, and carefully curating out of their timelines anyone from any different sort of background -- then hardens them in their unchallenged opinion.

For example, Ginch Bangwell (Kurt Schlichter), who is a practicing lawyer, said the first thing every lawyer does when he gets a judge assigned to a case is check his background.

But, to hear the professional middle class/media/conservative intellectual class tell it, such calculations and guesses are wholly inappropriate and are textbook racism and no one who is involved in a legal matter should ever make guesses about judge behavior based on "profiling."

Or, as a commenter put it here: Certainly, it is not the case that every prosecutor tries to stirke as many black women from a jury as the constitution will permit, and every defense attorney definitely does not try to strike every middle-aged white man from the jury.

I mean -- it's ideologically forbidden. And Theory is all that matters in the real world.

Theory's all that matters, guys. And certainly an Intellectual Class should be proud and even arrogant about its utter lack of contact with the real world.


Unchallenged unanimity of opinion is healthy in any intellectual tradition!

Once upon a time, conservatives prided themselves on being more practically-minded than their ideologically-possessed liberal brethren. They'd roll their eyes at the most strident, Strong Form, Politically Correct and Pure claims about the absolute inappropriateness of ever taking race or background into account -- whether choosing who to give additional screenings to on TSA lines, or who to pat down for contraband or guns, or even who to cross the street to avoid late at night.

No more. The conservative intellectual class has now embraced the most airy-fairy disconnected-from-any-tangible-reality Strong Form of political correctness long urged by the left, and it all took to get them to agree to this was to have it be momentarily convenient in making the case against Trump.

By the Way: On Trump's comments, you could claim he said one of two different things:

1. That every Hispanic must be "unable to do his job" due to his "heritage," as the intellectuals and the media prefer to claim.

2. That Trump guessed that the judge probably didn't like his position on the Wall -- something the media usually agrees with (when they put up their polls showing 85% of Hispanics disapproving of Trump and the Wall), and which Hillary agrees with -- or else why would she use Trump's wall comments to attempt to sway Hispanic opinion?

When Hillary's surrogates say they're going to tie the Wall around every Republican's neck -- I assume there's a reason for doing that, right? I assume Hispanics are not up in the air about it. I assume they sort of have an opinion, right?

But the intellectuals find that there's a little too much nuance in the last formulation of the charge, and intellectuals like moving around words to make ideological steel traps out of nothing at all, and they also like making things easy for themselves (they're kind of lazy, and prefer to argue against the most absurd version of an opponent's claim they can imagine rather than the strongest version of an opponent's claim they can imagine), so they all naturally chose Version One.

Or, let me adjust that claim: It may be that intellectuals like mental exertion and considering difficult questions.

Ideologues, however, do not enjoy this, and prefer things to be as simple and Beyond Any Possible Question and The Science is Settled as possible.

digg this
posted by Ace at 06:25 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Deplorable Ian Galt: "As usual, the world is in nearly complete Clown Sh ..."

Redenzo: "Four more years (pause) ..."

[/i][/b]andycanuck (vtyCZ)[/s][/u]: "Mmm. Yellow cake. . . Doh! ..."

old chick: "And it didn't actually mean Obama?? Posted by: an ..."

[/b][/s][/u][/i]Muldoon: "History does not move in a smooth arc that beds th ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "The thing with the Junta wanting to openly install ..."

Ignoramus: "It saddens me to see Rudy being treated so badly. ..."

LinusVanPelt : "He lives in a trailer down by the beach Posted by ..."

Truck Monkey Report: "105 Ninety miles WNW of Chicago. Posted by: gp In ..."

Martini Farmer: "> Republicans indicted in Arizona. ________ I th ..."

Ignoramus: "The thing with the Junta wanting to openly install ..."

And: "Either Mike Johnson is a fucking idiot, or he thin ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64