Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Leftists: It's An Insult to Harriet Tubman to Put Her On Money, Because She Was an Anti-Property, Anti-Capitalism Pre-Marxist Radical | Main | Ted Cruz Rally in Towson, Md. [Weirddave] »
April 21, 2016

"But They're Only Changing the $20 Bill Because They Want a Woman and/or a Black On It"

I pulled an old and dishonest trick in the last post: I didn't address a key objection, not because I wasn't aware of it, but because I was lazy, and didn't feel like addressing it.

That is, it was easier to argue against arguments that weren't being made than to address the argument actually being made, so, dishonestly, I chose the easier path of pretending the argument was other than what it was.

Let me correct that cheap and lazy error now.

To the statement that what is being objected to is that they're only changing the bill to put a woman and/or a black (and preferably both) on our money, I respond:

Yes, obviously.

But so what?

Our official pantheon of national heroes is mostly limited to whites, and mostly to white men. Of course there's a reason for that: At the times of momentous consequence in our past, white men were mostly calling the shots.

But i certainly do understand if women and blacks (and other minorities) want their own folk included in the pantheon.

Hell, I got annoyed when they made Johnny Storm black.

And I don't even like the Fantastic Four.

I don't think people are being quite honest with themselves when they say "Why should we indulge this need to have People Who Look Like You?" in places of honor, when they themselves seem to be pretty annoyed that people that don't look like them are being added.

It's not racist to want to see people that remind you of yourself in positions of respect. People may be utterly indifferent as to the gender or race of their heroes and role models, but something tells me more little girls looked up to Clara Barton than little boys did.

I think sometimes we can get kind of silly about pretending that there is -- or should be -- absolutely no tribal feelings of any kind in the world.

They exist and they're never going away, ever.

And if we're being honest, we have them as well.

Larry Bird and Magic Johnson were two competitors created almost as if by fate to oppose each other, first in the NCAAs and then in the NBA.

They were both incredible.

Guess who I identified more with and rooted for?

I could not object to blacks falling more on Team Magic just because he was black.

I favored Larry Bird more, I'm sure, partly because, in some part of me, I could imagine myself being Larry Bird, but could not quite imagine myself being Magic Johnson.

Just a a little girl may be able to imagine herself as Amelia Earhardt, but not Chuck Yaegher.

Just as a black kid might be able to imagine himself as Colin Powell but not necessarily Dwight Eisenhower.

(Though why they'd want to be Colin Powell, I have no idea.)

I feel this is very leftist mode of thought: to assert that one is utterly, completely without a particular sin (which is silly from Jump Street), and then begin finding fault with others for not living up to this self-declared absolute sinless purity one claims to have.

Everyone is flawed, including ourselves. Let's kind of admit this and stop throwing Impossible Ideals around and charging and sentencing people for not meeting these Impossible Ideals (as we ourselves do not meet them).

Ideals should be used for aspiration and emulation -- not for vindictive punishment. They're ideals. They cannot be quite lived up to. And being ideals, it's really no one's place to harshly judge someone for not living up to an ideal.

I think it would be healthy to begin having a more reasonable and honest discussion about morality and ideals, beginning firstly with a confession of the ways we each fall short of them.



digg this
posted by Ace at 04:44 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Moron Robbie - If this is how Georgia hires attorneys, imagine how they manage elections: "I think it was grump928 who made an outstanding po ..."

Don Black: "is everyone over on the main page, slapping f5 lik ..."

JackStraw: ">>The long-shredded pretense to impartiality is su ..."

Moron Robbie - If this is how Georgia hires attorneys, imagine how they manage elections: "Wakandyass it is! ..."

Don Black: "NYR 0 COL 0 end 1st p 🏒 ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "If the Wakandians hadn't been isolationists then t ..."

Puddleglum at work: "[i]173 167 I’ve often speculated that the re ..."

Moron Robbie - If this is how Georgia hires attorneys, imagine how they manage elections: "If the Wakandians hadn't been isolationists then t ..."

Ciampino - Bloody 'experts' again ...: "158 For being the alleged "birthplace of civilizat ..."

sock_rat_eez - these lying bastardi e stronzi have been lying to us for decades [/b][/u][/i][/s]: "got to have a spread of alternatives, amirite? ..."

Bulgaroctonus : "167 I’ve often speculated that the reason th ..."

Hairyback Guy: "Anita Bryant > All Other Female Crooners ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64