Sponsored Content

Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

« The Guardian: Mexico Tortures Illegal Immigrants To Make Them Admit They're In the Country Illegally | Main | Special Snowflakes, UK Edition: Student Hit With Complaint for "Showing Signs of Disagreement" During Another Student's Anti-Israel Rantings »
April 04, 2016

Judge Allows Case to Go Forward In Tough Decision Against Brandeis University

Universities continue putting students into rape courts for things which are plainly not rapes, and furthermore, continuing denying them the most basic due process during these kangaroo courts.

One ridiculous example of this is going on at Brandeis, where one gay guy looked askance at things that happened during their sexual relationship, post break-up, and decided they constituted unwanted sexual conduct.

The unwanted sexual contacts that "John Doe" was found guilty were:

* Putting his hand on the complainant "JC's" groin at a movie date, without verbal consent. (The two had consensual sex the next day.)

* Sometimes waking up JC during their relationship by kissing him, without consent. (As he was sleeping -- consent can't be had.)

* Sometimes looking at JC's private areas during their relationship, while showering. I assume without consent, though if you're showering with someone, well.

* Attempting to perform an act of oral sex on JC during their relationship, which JC didn't want. They fought about it, then later made up.

Take out the gay aspect of the relationship here, and this is pretty much what happens in every relationship. As far as the "putting the hand on the groin" -- at some point, someone initiates sexual contact.

Apparently at Brandeis, it's a crime to try to get to second base.

At some point, they broke up. JC began drinking a lot, and also attending -- I'm not kidding -- "sexual assault workshops," which apparently spurred him to look at their relationship in a whole new rapey light.

On this basis, while denying John Doe the right to know what the charges were against him, to question the complaining witness, etc:

Among other things, under the new procedure,

* the accused was not entitled to know the details of the charges;

* the accused was not entitled to see the evidence;

* the accused was not entitled to counsel;

* the accused was not entitled to confront and cross-examine the accuser;

* the accused was not entitled to cross-examine any other witnesses;

* the Special Examiner prepared a detailed report, which the accused was not
permitted to see until the entire process had concluded; and

* the Special Examiner’s decision as to the "responsibility" (that is, guilt) of the
accused was essentially final, with limited appellate review--among other things,
the decision could not be overturned on the ground that it was incorrect, unfair,
arbitrary, or unsupported by the evidence

Making this even worse was the litany of things the Special Examiner found could not be relevant and could not be admitted in the hearing:

Among other things, the Special Examiner based her findings on the following assumptions:

* that the long delay in reporting the alleged misconduct, and the failure to make
any contemporaneous complaint, had no bearing at all on J.C.'s credibility;

* that the existence of a 21-month-long relationship was irrelevant to any of the
issues in the case, including the issue of consent;

* that John's kissing of J.C. while he was asleep constituted sexual misconduct,
because a person who is sleeping is incapacitated and therefore not capable of
giving express consent; and

* that J.C.'s abuse of alcohol after the relationship ended bolstered his credibility,
on the ground that victims of sexual assault may abuse substances as a
consequence of the assault

Bolstered his credibility, rather than undermined it, because victims of a 21-month-long rape start hitting the sauce, I guess.

No mention of how the "sexual assault workshops" factored into JC's thinking.

Brandeis found John Doe guilty of violating the campus provisions against sexual assault.

John Doe is now suing Brandeis for, essentially, having branded him a sexual predator in a kangaroo court, and Brandeis moved for the court to dismiss the lawsuit for failure to state any claim.

The court refused to do so -- and furthermore seemed to tip its hand that it thinks John Doe's case is not only legally meritorious, but likely to prevail at trial.

KC Johnson -- the academic who uncovered the fraud in the Crystal Gayle Mangum hoax rape case -- is continuing to document these abuses, and has put up key sections of the ruling with some brief commentary.

One question I have is: Would the court have been so sympathetic to John Doe if JC were a woman? That is, is this just a case of the PC hierarchy of Preferred Persons being preferred? Had John Doe tried to get to second base with a girl on a date, and sometimes woken her up with kisses in the morning, would courts have been more sympathetic to poor JC's plight?

But even if that's the case, the ruling as written must be taken to apply to all similarly-situated persons. It could protect a man accused of touching a girl's tit during a make-out session, or even protect a girl accused of making a power move to the guy's junk during the same make-out session.

Who knows what our lunatic ruling class will actually do with it, though.

One thing to always keep in mind: Colleges are not just doing this on their own initiative. The Obama Administration effectively ordered them to do this with its notorious "Dear Colleague" letter, instructing colleges that they had better begin installing exciting new kangaroo court innovations unless they wanted to be found in violation of Title IX and lose their federal funding.

digg this
posted by Ace at 05:03 PM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
The_Hoser: "There are black women named Tiffany? ..."

Chuck Martel: "231 Hey Horde, you'll never guess who just sent me ..."

browndog controls his red rocket : "Unless you fail a lift and drop it on your neck or ..."

Duke Lowell : "I used to be a workout hound. Now when I get the u ..."

Ben Had: "Hi JT. ..."

BifBewalski: "Well, phuck. Reading content like a damned rookie ..."

redridinghood: "Regarding the new Fanni allegations- Gotta love J ..."

Ben Had: "Helena Handbasket, I thought you were gonna say m ..."

Dr. Pork Chops & Bacons: "People have died benching alone. And almost die ..."

Aetius451AD: "237 232 When you take a closer look at the food py ..."

bonhomme[/i][/i][/i][/b][/b][/b][/s][/s][/s][/u][/u][/u]: "> Hey Horde, you'll never guess who just sent me t ..."

JT: "Hiya BenHad ! ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64