Shock: Nikki Haley to Endorse Amnesty Candidate Marco Rubio

Here's the game: The Establishment pretends it's anti-Trump. They whip people up to support anybody but Trump.

But what they're trying to do is winnow the field so it's only their own hand-picked candidate, Amnesty Candidate Marco Rubio, against Trump.

It's very obvious. It was obvious to me, if not Allah, that when Nikki Haley gave her unprecedented attack-the-frontrunner-of-my-own-party SOTU rebuttal, she was boosting Rubio, even if she then rushed out to deny that and claim that she could support anybody except Trump.

Well, here you go: she's endorsing Amnesty Candidate Marco Rubio.

Amnesty candidate Marco Rubio has been the candidate of amnesty as far back as 1998, when he urged amnesty for Honduran refugees.

While serving as a city commissioner in West Miami, Marco Rubio voted in favor of a city resolution urging the federal government to give Honduran illegal immigrants permanent resident status and free them from risk of deportation, according to documents obtained by The Daily Caller.

The 2012 post-mortem claimed it could make no policy recommendations, as that wasn't its job. But then it put that to one side and made a single recommendation: It urged the GOP to become another party of amnesty.

Some of you support amnesty -- that's fine. That's your opinion. If you're in favor of amnesty, of course it makes perfect sense to support the Amnesty Candidate Marco Rubio.

But many of you do not support amnesty. And the Establishment is attempting to manipulate you into supporting their amnesty policy by selling you on Rubio, the only candidate, supposedly, that can beat Hillary. (A claim which gets more and more false everytime they make it: Cruz polls better than Hillary, and even Trump now has an inside-the-MOE one point lead on Hillary.)

They have been attempting to trick you, bully you, and weary you into accepting amnesty for ten f***ing years.

This is but their latest gambit -- we're not telling you to support Amnesty this time.

We're just saying that, by happenstance, it turns out the only candidate who can win supports Amnesty.

Just sort of worked out that way!

Again, if you support amnesty, then by all means support the declared amnesty candidate Marco Rubio.

But if you don't support amnesty, then for God's sake stop letting the same crooked clutch of donors, insiders, and establishment toadies piss in your mouth and tell you it's Zima.

For my own part, they may think that if they manipulate the chess board and leave me no other options, I'll get behind amnesty candidate Marco Rubio.

Nope. At that point I'll knock over the chessboard.

I'm as good as my word, Establishment. Many of us are.

I'm not a fan of Trump, who I agree is completely unsuitable for the job of president, but if you get your wish and force me into a choice between Rubio and Trump: I vote for Trump.

You don't get to win this one. You don't get to keep forcing this shit down our throats and keep profiting on your deceits.

I may lose, but as I've said before: You will lose too.

They continue, by the way, in their own fervent opposition to Ted Cruz, because 1, he's anti-amnesty and 2 he's anti-establishment.

This isn't really them being all-in for anyone but Trump; this is them, once again, demanding that their political feathers be preened before all others.

Once again they're demanding that their candidate, and only their candidate, is acceptable.

Well, we'll see about that.

But I for one am not voting for an amnesty candidate. Period.

posted by Ace at 04:25 PM

| Access Comments