Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups


NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Registration Is Open!


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Top Headlines Comments | Main | Open Thread »
October 21, 2015

Paul Ryan: I'll Agree To Lead You Idiots But You're Going To Have To Kiss My Ring And Squawk Like A Chicken First

Paul Ryan finally made an announcement on his interest/intentions on being the next Speaker of the House. Basically, he's willing to accept the Freedom Caucuses surrender in exchange for...that's not very clear.

Here's the statement his office released about what he told members and what he wants to take the job.

First the good in Ryan's demands. He wants weekends off. Some people seem to think this is bad. They want the next Speaker out on the hustings fundraising all the time.

I don't.

The people Boehner has been out talking to and grabbing money from generally don't want things I want. And let's not pretend they don't want anything for the money they are coughing up. The less the next Speaker is out yucking it up with the "donor class" the better as far as I'm concerned.

After that things get....dicey.

Ryan says he wants unity in the caucus. Well, good luck with that. "Unity" sounds nice in theory but what would it mean in practice? What policies will Republicans be expected to unify around? Who exactly will be expected to give up the things they care about in order to achieve "unity"?

This is the sort of thing that gets settled in a campaign for a spot. Candidates call in favors or offer inducements for support but you get an idea of where they are going and what they are trading for votes.

Ryan wants to be installed without really going through that process. He hears the pleas for a White Knight to ride to the rescue and is simply telling people what they'll give him and not what he'll do in return. At least not publicly.

Ryan also wants conservatives to unilaterally disarm by getting rid of the chance to remove him through a motion to "Vacate the Chair".

And this is where things go off the rails.

Why do you want this Paul? If you're going to be a unifying figure, why exactly do you think this almost never used procedure that dates back almost to the establishment of the House itself needs to go? What exactly do you think you might be doing that would lead to such discontent that it would be used against you?

Ryan isn't a wild eyed conservative but he's not a RINO squish either. Still, there's nothing conservative about demanding power while getting rid of a centuries old check on power.

I'd be pretty meh on Ryan as Speaker under normal circumstances. Someone has to do the job, he's as good and bad as anyone the GOP can produce. What rankles me is this idea that it's so obvious that he is the Savior the GOP needs that disagreeing with him marks you as a krazy konservative kook.


Yes, his budget plan was a modest step in the right direction but he has plenty of faults too. He's aggressively pro-amnesty, he was underwhelming in the VP debate last time and oh yeah, he cut a terrible, no good, tax and spending hiking deal with the Democrats two years ago.

The biggest problem with this whole mess is the way the fix is in. Boehner called off the elections when Kevin McCarthy pulled out last time. Maybe neither of the other candidates who were running wold have gotten a majority but the vote should have been held.

At the least there should be a date for elections set and if Ryan wants to run fine, let's see if he gets the votes. There are other candidates who will run. Let the caucus vote on them. This clearing the field and special concession for a guy who isn't the Second Coming of Jesus is contemptuous of conservatives. None of these guys are owed deference based on past results.

Fun note, there was a time when the moderates who now insist that what Ryan wants, Ryan must get opposed his budgets because they cut too much and wouldn't vote for appropriation bills because they wanted to spend more than Ryan allowed.

I don't blame Ryan for trying to leverage the best terms he can get. The question is, does he really want the job? Some seem to think not and that's he just laying out unreasonable conditions he know won't be agreed to so he can say, "I'd have done it for the team" but then the "team" can blame those damn conservatives for stopping the last best hope for America from taking the job.

If Ryan doesn't get the job because the Freedom Caucus won't kiss his ass....well. My guess is the GOP moderates will freak out, call the conservatives traitors and cut a deal with the Democrats to install some super squish in the chair. And then the fun really begins.

digg this
posted by DrewM. at 09:53 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
JackStraw: ">>Do the women not understand what causes pregnanc ..."

TheJamesMadison, fighting kaiju with Ishiro Honda: "240 I wouldn't break bread with that lying sack of ..."

San Franpsycho: "I wouldn't break bread with that lying sack of sh* ..."

whig: "226 Men "trick women into having babies"? What? Mo ..."

Field Marshal Zhukov: "It was Insty and staff fucking autocorrect ..."

Adirondack Patriot: "Nina Jankowicz and Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. The ..."

Xi Jinping: "Ooh. Brinken tough guy ..."

BurtTC: "Blinken Threatens China Over Russia Ties, Warns Xi ..."

Marcotte-style feminist: "Do the women not understand what causes pregnancy? ..."

SMOD: "223 In the 60s, it was all Vietnam. Young men had ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks, I've Been Through the Desert On a Horse With No Shame [/s] [/b] [/i]: "Spork guy?? Posted by: tubal If we can invent ..."

Thomas Bender: "@222 >>Haven't I seen this movie before ? I ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64