Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

NoVaMoMe 2024: 06/08/2024
Arlington, VA
Details to follow


Texas MoMe 2024: 10/18/2024-10/19/2024 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Chris Christie: I Would Have Told That Questioner That Obama is a Christian, Then Maybe Hugged Xer for an Uncomfortably Long Period of Time | Main | Did Ahmad Really Build a DIY Clock, Or Did He Just Take a Commonly-Available Radio Shack Alarm Clock Out of Its Case and Stick It In a Pencil-Box? »
September 18, 2015

Here's An Argument I Just Had

I was arguing that we shouldn't jump to SJW mob up on Ann Coulter. I noted that Lee Harris wrote about this yesterday, and could find only one previous statement of Coulter's that was arguably, and I do mean arguably, "anti-semitic."

That was during a discussion with Donny Deutsch, specifically on religion, when Coulter ventured that Christians that Jews were just swell, but needed "to be perfected" -- that is needed, like all other people (per Christian doctrine), to accept Jesus Christ as Savior.

Some Jewish people on Twitter took offense at that. (Most, it should be said, did not.)

But I have heard this claim made before: That to be "tolerant" of Judaism, a Christian essentially must accept Judaism as an equally metaphysically correct religion. That is, the idea runs that it is dangerous and "anti-semitic" to not make an exception for Jews in Christian doctrine. This is based on the fact that Christians have committed terrible crimes against Jews in the past, and of course anti-semitism still exists among some Christian populations.

But this idea seems to me to be nonsense on stilts, as it has seemed to me since I first heard it, expressed vigorously (if not always explicitly) with regard to Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. Many Jews who I otherwise respect essentially made the case, to my ears at least, that to proselytize for Christianity was, de facto, a sort of anti-semitism, as it could lead (and yes, it could definitely so lead) to anti-Jewish persecution.

While fully admitting the latter possibility, all religion can, in some circumstances, lead to anger and violence against nonbelievers. That's a terrible thing, obviously, but it can hardly, to my mind, justify a sort of demand that Christians rewrite their religion to interject an asterisk that then reads: Christ is Lord, but Judaism is equally valid and it's cool if you want to believe that too.

I've never heard such a breathtaking claim in matters of theology, to claim that a particular religion must admit that another religion is equally valid. No religions do that, except for a small number of explicitly fusionist religions which intentionally attempt to claim that all religions are, somehow, equally kind of true.

But no religion apart from such fusionist religions does so. All other religions maintain that they are themselves the sole and exclusive True Version of the Word of God.

To claim that Christians must accept that Judaism is "just as valid" as Christianity is as absurd as claiming that Jews must accept that Christ just might be the Messiah.

It's preposterous, and no one would accept such a proposition when laid upon himself. But people, being people, lay such rules upon Others with terrific aplomb.

This is why I always come back to the simple, powerful brilliance of the Shoe on the Other Foot test: If you are proposing a rule for others, and you would not accept a similar or analogous rule for yourself, the rule you're advancing is invalid, and almost certainly a creature of poor thinking our outright bigotry.

I mean bigotry in the sense that many people are willing to say "Well you have to believe my thing but of course I don't have to believe yours -- because mine is obviously right." That's a bigoted statement, because it provides no reason for treating oneself more favorably than someone else, except for the claim that "I, myself, am right."

I just don't get this claim. I understand that Jews are, very understandably, worried by what Christians might do if they get possessed by an anti-Other sort of feeling. Certainly their concerns in this regard are not hallucinatory.

But I cannot see how any thinking person could possibly put forward the idea that another religion must rewrite itself (down to the very core of it) in order to guard against that.

I continued to be baffled by this sort of thinking, and I continue being baffled at how people can never, ever recognize when they are making an bigoted claim.



digg this
posted by Ace at 06:07 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
ShainS -- Blood-Bath-and-Beyond angel investor [/b][/i][/s][/u] : "I bought a MAGA hat from the Trumpster, I was gett ..."

Tamaa the Drongo Bird: "THE WEATHER STARTED GETTING ROUGH,THE TIN ..."

The Grammar Nazi Who's Bad At Grammar: "Yeah, but ranked choice voting and excuse-free/100 ..."

Catch Thirty-Thr33: "291 Have I mentioned voting straight ticket R like ..."

chatgpt: "221 [i]So "people aren't buying the lies" is now c ..."

Tamaa the Drongo Bird: "Florida is Not New York or California the ..."

Piper: "Speaking of things Biden has done, I am off to get ..."

old chick: "Who is saying that? Posted by: Archimedes 194 ..."

Lady Who Always Has a Burning Question: "Oops. Sorry. You said "this fall". ..."

Braenyard: "281 I liked the part where the Black man asked her ..."

mrp: "240 Go tell MA. Posted by: Axeman at March 28, 20 ..."

Wyatt Earp : "Philly will still try to avoid this. As always. ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64