Useful Idiot Carol Costello Pleads With Jeffery Toobin to Say Obama Didn't Really Lose at the Supreme Court

He can't have lost, he just can't have! Please say he didn't lose!

She questioned whether Obama had really lost in the NLRB decision.

But Costello couldn't accept the defeat. "So as usual, Jeffrey Toobin, this is a more complicated decision," she said. "It's just not black and white. Cause I guess you could say the president lost . . . but did he?"

"Yeah, he lost," Toobin replied quickly. "There's no doubt."

"Well he lost in this particular case," she admitted plaintively. "But overall, right?"

"Well . . . no, he lost overall," Toobin insisted.

At the end, obviously defeated and struggling to find some upside to this, she asks Toobin if this means the Supreme Court is the bad guy -- specifically, she asks if those Supreme Court stupid-heads have "increased gridlock" by their decision. You know, "gridlock," the thing progressive media people hate when Congress is slowing down a progressive president, but which they're more of a fan of when Congress is slowing down a conservative.

Video at the link.

The most amusing thing yesterday was hundreds of Outraged! progressives tweeting their venom at SCOTUSblog, under the utterly-mistaken assumption that SCOTUSblog was actually Antonin Scalia's personal blog, or at least the official blog of the Supreme Court.

SCOTUSblog -- which has no actual relationship to the Supreme Court, just as Instapundit has no true relationship with things which are Insta -- retweeted these outraged comments all day, adding their own snarky responses, playing along with the stupidity of the crowd.

Funny stuff:

Or:

Here, one dummy insists that the Justices of the Supreme Court sign their tweets. You know, when the Justices tweet. That they should sign their tweets. Like Obama signs his tweets "-BO" when he actually writes them. (Allegedly.)

posted by Ace at 01:38 PM

| Access Comments