Sponsored Content




Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!



Recent Entries
Absent Friends
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« "The Tea Party Would Rather Burn Than Submit To Washington" | Main | Open Thread »
July 01, 2014

C'mon Guys, Hobby Lobby Was A Victory For Religious Americans

I've been knocking down the low-hanging fruit from leftists and the news media for months on Hobby Lobby, and I suspect I'll have more opportunities to do that for months and maybe years (gulp) to come. Yesterday's decision was a victory for religious freedom, but I'm seeing a few commentators for the right, perhaps just out of a sense of contrarianism, suggest that it is not.

For example, I was startled to see this read on the decision from Forbes' Avik Roy:


Roy's linked column suggests:

Pro-life activists—and Obamacare opponents—are cheering today. But when they sit down and reflect, they’ll realize that they haven’t won a thing.

He points out that one of the alternatives Justice Alito suggested to forcing businesses run according to their owners' religious beliefs to provide contraception or abortifacient coverage would be for the government to provide it. Roy thinks that is no victory:

Ah, but who finances the government? Taxpayers. In other words, while the government can’t compel Hobby Lobby to finance abortifacients, it can compel taxpayers to do so. Isn’t that a distinction without a difference?

I objected to this blunt equivalence. There is a vast difference between forcing an individual company to act in a morally objectionable way and requiring all taxpayers to pay taxes that may in some fraction be used in a manner with which the payer disagrees. Roy doubled down:


But even this economic equivalence is wrong for obvious reasons. Forcing a business to bear the entire burden of providing contraception coverage for its employees is quite different than forcing the business-as-taxpayer to pay for a fraction of that contraception coverage. Notably, taxpayers as a group include people who both support, oppose, or are indifferent to contraception coverage. That's an economic distinction, and it's also the foundation of a moral and a legal one.

We do not as a society now believe that the actions of government are morally or legally or economically equivalent to the actions of individual taxpayers and never have. The funding of war, opposed for religious and moral reasons, is the obvious example, but this principle extends to other government actions of dubious moral and religious quality, like funding capital punishment, abortion, property seizures, you name it.

Does Roy or anyone really believe that I am morally or legally or economically culpable for the President's drone assassination program in which civilian bystanders are killed? Of course not. I don't direct the program or have any way of preventing it, and my financial contribution to it is de minimis. Roy's contrarian theory of equivalence would treat pushing the button to kill an anonymous civilian as the same as paying my taxes, an obviously silly claim and one not shared, so much as I can tell, by many others.

Moreover, even for people who believe that fractionally financing objectionable government action by paying taxes comes with an equivalent fractional moral culpability, not having to directly and fully finance the objectionable action has to be counted an improvement.

Thus, upon reflection, yes those of us who support religious freedom really "won a thing" in yesterday's Hobby Lobby decision. As I have written several times, the case was never going to knock down Obamacare, but that wasn't its object. The case, despite what you'll see in the news media, was about religious liberty. And on that basis, Justice Alito's decision was a clear victory.


digg this
posted by Gabriel Malor at 10:01 AM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Bulgaroctonus: "Article II states: “The electors shall meet ..."

Masturbatin' Pete: "322 Dude I don't know what to tell you. If you ..."

Archimedes: "[i]Posted by: Archimedes at February 21, 2024 03:2 ..."

Seems Legit: "410 Whoever Trump picks, he/she will be exponentia ..."

Tar Bae: "Who lost in a landslide. Posted by: TheJamesMadis ..."

Burnt Umber: "Jan 11, 2024 — Trump said on Wednesday he's ..."

Jaimo: "Youngkin is still a middle of the road maybe sligh ..."

ShainS -- Boycott New York & other Blue Shithole Cities #TruckersForTrump[/b][/i][/s][/u] : "Former pro cyclist disinvited from Women's Day eve ..."

McLurkerson: "YES No Maybe HELL NO YES No. ..."

Bulgaroctonus: "Youngkin can't run for Governor. Youngkin can run ..."

Seems Legit: "There are many misconceptions about the rules of a ..."

Dr. Pork Chops & Bacons: "Whoever Trump picks, he/she will be exponentially ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64