Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Recent Entries
Former Clinton Advisor Mark Penn: ABC "News" Should Submit to a Full Third-Party Investigation to Determine If They Schemed to Fact-Check Only Trump
The New Yorker Refuse to Correct Russian Misinformation, Still Claiming That Kamala Harris Never Endorsed Using US Taxpayer Money to Pay for Sex Changes for Illegal Alien Teenagers THE MORNING RANT: Harvard Launches “Introductory” Math Course for its Students Who Can’t Do 9th Grade Math Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 9/13/24 Daily Tech News 13 September 2024 That Night On The Marge Of Lake Lebarg, I Cremated The ONT Freaky Deaky Cafe Quick Hits Trump Rules Out Further Debates, Declaring "I Won" Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« "The Economics of Sex" |
Main
| I Love You, Government, Part II: The Official Weather Forecast Failed to Predict a Tough Winter »
February 19, 2014
On Maximalist DemandsI had an exchange with Emperor of Icecream. Because this idea is central, in my opinion, to the mechanism by which we lose elections we could and should win, I'm popping it out as a main post. Below, the exchange. Emperor's comments signaled by my ">>>" idiosyncratic quotations. >>>OK, fine, but what's your solution? I'm willing to let you do whatever the hell if it doesn't affect my kids. But I won't accept that my kids welfare and well-being is secondary to you getting your rocks off. Let's be frank. A country made up of Aces is doomed. No kids, no future. Indeed, s'true. >>>So why should you getting what you want trump me getting what I want? Because you will not get what you want. You will continue making outsized demands on the public that they consider completely unreasonable and they will not only tune you out, but outright reject you as "extreme." By making outsized demands you are poisoning the well for achievable goals. This is part and parcel of this madness that has taken over the party that "We get more of what we want by having a starting position that is not only maximalist, but, according to public opinion polls, extremist, and outside the overton window." This theory makes no sense. I have been in negotiations in contracts where the opposite party demanded what I thought were unreasonable things. This did not result in my "giving them more." What it resulted in was my walking away from the contract entirely. You know why? because they had telegraphed their desire to make unreasonable demands on me. I saw into the future, and I saw a future in which my counter-party would routinely invoke contractual clauses to control me, despite the fact I was specifically rejecting the specific controls sought. And yet every day I sit here and read that the way to "win" is to make Big Huge Demands on the public. And every day I say "that's not how the left does it, the left engages in incrementalism and slowly raising the temperature of the water so the frog does not realize it's boiling," and every single day I hear people reject this and just insist, again and again, despite all available evidence and personal experience and logic, that we "win" by making the demands we actually seek ten or 20 years down the road, upfront, as our *starting offer,* our opening bid. >>>If that's your bottom line, all that happens is that you are building up an interest group of parents who are gonna hate libertarianism. As the pornification of the very young becomes more and more apparent, the pressure to do something about it will also grow. So if your bottom line is that in practice sexual libertarianism is opposed to children's welfare, you are making it inevitable that sexual libertarianism will be deeply curtailed. Yeah well it's not happened yet, has it? Your entire argument is that this gets worse and worse by the day. Ergo, there is no evidence for this Uprising you speak of, and quite a bit of evidence against it. >>>But most parents are OK with adults doing their thing, so long as the experience of growing up isn't cheapened and sexualized by it. So you should try to appeal to them by trying to find a way to make that work. That is what I am trying to do. And I am trying to tell you that while most adults will find it quite reasonable to agitate agaisnt the sexualization of children, they will vote against you, with hostility, for extending that reasonable impulse into an unreasonable one -- patrolling their own sexual choices. Added Thought: One of the ways in which we lose on a perfectly reasonable position is this: The public hears us talking about children, but, as with Hillary Clinton, they strongly suspect that "children" are simply the most attractive faces for this policy, and that what is really meant, and ultimately sought, is laws and controls on adults. And then they say: No thank you. And I cannot say that the public's suspicion about this is invalid, given that many people do in fact make the case that it's "all connected," and that adult behavior does in fact influence children's behavior, and that, therefore, adult behavior needs to be restrained "for the children." You can't sell this argument -- this is only about the children -- because it's not true. And you can't get angry at the public or "LIVs" for realizing it's not true, when in fact it's not true. The LIVs are right. The "children" are but the opening bid, the tip of the icebreaker's blade, for a much more extensive agenda that ultimately reaches adults. On the other hand: What if the argument actually were true, and people internalized the idea that they ought not push for political/legal restraints on adults, but only on children? In that case the argument could work -- because, you know, it would have the benefit of being true from the outset, rather than false. | Recent Comments
BlackOrchid:
"it was a setup and a pile on and he kept fighting ..."
Don Black- resupplied now & rolling like a juggernaut: " Y'all know this effort is going nowhere, right? ..." San Franpsycho: "Megyn's rant was righteous. ..." Bertram Cabot, Jr.: " [i]A cousin of Davis set up a prayer meeting on ..." Boron Cobbie - Men say they prefer this, women say no you are wrong: "Ace, it was posted below. We very well may live i ..." Divide by Zero [/i]: " Trump: "She's a Marxist!" Fact Checkers Huddl ..." JackStraw: "I still say it's way too early to claim Trump doin ..." Polliwog the 'Ette: "A lot of weird asides in that article on Davis. Pa ..." The Central Scrutinizer: "28 By third party, I believe they mean a firm owne ..." kallisto: "[i]Odd that a former Clinton guy would come out so ..." Boron Cobbie - Men say they prefer this, women say no you are wrong: "nood ..." TheJamesMadison, going full throttle with Tony Scott: "By third party, I believe they mean a firm owned b ..." Recent Entries
Former Clinton Advisor Mark Penn: ABC "News" Should Submit to a Full Third-Party Investigation to Determine If They Schemed to Fact-Check Only Trump
The New Yorker Refuse to Correct Russian Misinformation, Still Claiming That Kamala Harris Never Endorsed Using US Taxpayer Money to Pay for Sex Changes for Illegal Alien Teenagers THE MORNING RANT: Harvard Launches “Introductory” Math Course for its Students Who Can’t Do 9th Grade Math Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 9/13/24 Daily Tech News 13 September 2024 That Night On The Marge Of Lake Lebarg, I Cremated The ONT Freaky Deaky Cafe Quick Hits Trump Rules Out Further Debates, Declaring "I Won" Search
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Primary Document: The Audio
Paul Anka Haiku Contest Announcement Integrity SAT's: Entrance Exam for Paul Anka's Band AllahPundit's Paul Anka 45's Collection AnkaPundit: Paul Anka Takes Over the Site for a Weekend (Continues through to Monday's postings) George Bush Slices Don Rumsfeld Like an F*ckin' Hammer Top Top Tens
Democratic Forays into Erotica New Shows On Gore's DNC/MTV Network Nicknames for Potatoes, By People Who Really Hate Potatoes Star Wars Euphemisms for Self-Abuse Signs You're at an Iraqi "Wedding Party" Signs Your Clown Has Gone Bad Signs That You, Geroge Michael, Should Probably Just Give It Up Signs of Hip-Hop Influence on John Kerry NYT Headlines Spinning Bush's Jobs Boom Things People Are More Likely to Say Than "Did You Hear What Al Franken Said Yesterday?" Signs that Paul Krugman Has Lost His Frickin' Mind All-Time Best NBA Players, According to Senator Robert Byrd Other Bad Things About the Jews, According to the Koran Signs That David Letterman Just Doesn't Care Anymore Examples of Bob Kerrey's Insufferable Racial Jackassery Signs Andy Rooney Is Going Senile Other Judgments Dick Clarke Made About Condi Rice Based on Her Appearance Collective Names for Groups of People John Kerry's Other Vietnam Super-Pets Cool Things About the XM8 Assault Rifle Media-Approved Facts About the Democrat Spy Changes to Make Christianity More "Inclusive" Secret John Kerry Senatorial Accomplishments John Edwards Campaign Excuses John Kerry Pick-Up Lines Changes Liberal Senator George Michell Will Make at Disney Torments in Dog-Hell Greatest Hitjobs
The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny More Margaret Cho Abuse Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed" Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means Wonkette's Stand-Up Act Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report! Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet The House of Love: Paul Krugman A Michael Moore Mystery (TM) The Dowd-O-Matic! Liberal Consistency and Other Myths Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate "Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long) The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) |