Intermarkets' Privacy Policy

Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!

Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Wednesday Morning News Dump | Main | White House Officials Spin Politico Reporter, Pushing Two Contradictory Claims: The President Was Totally Engaged on and a Dilligent Manager, But Knew Absolutely Nothing About It At All
November 13, 2013

Should The GOP Be Trying To Pass Any ObamaCare Fix Or Remediation?

On Friday the House will take up a bill sponsored by Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Fred Upton (yes, he's Kate's uncle) that purports to let people who have health insurance polices keep them regardless of the ACA and HHS regulations. I say "purports" because it's unclear that the damage done by ObmaCare can be undone in time to prevent people from losing coverage on January 1st.

The question is, should the GOP try and do this at the risk of either "saving" ObamaCare or being seen as equally culpable in its failures. To date, the GOP has stayed mostly on the sidelines, keeping their fingerprints off the debacle (they helped pass a minor tweak in the original 1099 reporting requirements in the bill)?

Conn Carroll argues that Upton's, "Keep Your Health Plan" bill has a major makes the same promise Obama did and is just as unlikely to be able to deliver on it.

But unlike the competing Senate bill, sponsored Sens. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the Upton bill does not force insurance companies to offer the old plans. It only allows them to do so.

This, as Capretta points out, would take pressure off Obamcare and Democrats, and move it to evil insurance companies who are refusing to let people keep their insurance.

Why on earth would Republicans want to bail Democrats out on Obamacare by supplying them with a villain to scapegoat?

Liberals on the other hand worry that if Upton's bill becomes law it will kill the whole notion of the exchanges and take the entire system with it.

Nicholas Bagley, a professor of health law at the University of Michigan, pointed out that those who currently have policies on the individual market tend to be healthier than most -- if not, they'd probably be priced out or locked out due to a preexisting condition. "If those relatively healthy people can keep their current plans outside the exchanges, they won't enter the same risk pool as everyone else on the exchanges," he said. "That means the exchanges will have a higher proportion of unhealthy people shopping for insurance than anticipated."

"In the long run, that will drive up the cost of insurance on the exchanges," Bagley said. "In the short run, it could mean that the prices at which insurers are selling their plans are too low to cover the medical costs of those who enroll. Because the adoption of the Upton bill would wreak havoc with their actuarial models, insurers are likely to resist its adoption."

There's the rub...getting people out of the individual market and into the exchanges was a necessary part of the plan. It's why Obama had Health and Human Services write the rules to get as many people made ineligible for grandfathering in the first place, they need them to subsidize the poor and sick who are getting covered.

The bottom line is this is a political move masquerading as policy. The GOP has to be seen doing something. That's just reality. Millions of people who played by the rules are losing their insurance and quite possibly their doctors as well. It's simply not an option for a political party to say, "Wow, that sucks for you. Should have voted for us, huh?". Campaigns are about generating future support, not punishing voters for past lack of support.

The upside is that the GOP is doing this in a way that panders completely to the people who just, "want something done" but is also a poison pill to the Democrats. Obama doesn't want to "fix" what isn't a bug in the system but from his point of view, a necessary feature.

The risk in all of this is that the Democrats say "yes". I have my doubts that the Senate will take up the Landrieu bill let alone pass Upton's. And the odds of Obama signing any of them are zero (he never has to face voters and he cares more about his plan than some random Democrats).

Could this all go south and wind up with the GOP sharing blame for Obama's failure? Theoretically, yes. But doing nothing isn't risk free either. Lacking any attempt to help people who were lied to, voters are more likely to say "a pox upon both of you". On balance it seems trying to do something that won't actually happened seems to me to help spotlight the damage the Democrats have done.

Added: To be clear, personally I'd prefer full repeal or Let it Burn. I'm just looking at this from a real world political point of view. As I've written before, the interests of conservatives and the GOP have diverged.

digg this
posted by DrewM. at 11:15 AM

| Access Comments

Recent Comments
Piper: "293 I thought Progressives hated guns. So, why are ..."

Dr. T: "I don't claim any special expertise in the Baldwin ..."

neverenoughcaffeine: "I smell ozone. Thanks CBD. ..."

CharlieBrown'sDildo: "[i]Posted by: Erebus- ex-killer whale at July 12, ..."

nurse ratched : "I thought Progressives hated guns. So, why are th ..."

Kindltot: "It has gone down to 86, so I will go out and weed ..."

Tuna: "That sounds…lovely. It is hotter than satan& ..."

Piper: " Pickled okra is yummy. Posted by: Tuna at July ..."

Erebus- ex-killer whale: "Here we go. Clint Eastwood pointed all that shit v ..."

Ben Had: "Knee deep straw mixed with alfalfa hay . ..."

Pug Mahon, Nothing to Contribute to the Debate: "In high school I had a good friend who went bad. h ..."

Notorious BFD: "[i]There are certain nics I avoid addressing, or a ..."

Recent Entries

Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64