Rolling Stone's New Celebrity Icon | Main | Overnight Open Thread (7-16-2013)
July 16, 2013

Are You Ready for the "iWatch"?

titre-1706755-jpg_1576501.JPG
Mock-up of what the iWatch might look like,
by outside speculators at ADR Studios, via http://www.lepoint.fr

Apple's hiring vigorously for a special project that may be the iWatch. It could be that they've run into tough engineering problems and are scrambling to solve them, which could delay the rumored 2013 release until next year.

Or maybe Tim Cook has decided to scrap the project and he needs bodies to wind it down and pack it up and put it in the basement.

But maybe it's a silly Dick Tracy idea whose time has come.

[A]pplications from Apple to trademark the iWatch name in Mexico, Taiwan, and Turkey, as well as Japan and Russia, have added to the speculation, with one analyst predicting the decision to move ahead with production may have already been made.

Still, the success of smartwatches this time around is by no means guaranteed, as among other things tech companies will need to convince consumers that they need to start wearing watches again (a market, ironically, killed by the clock on a mobile phone). And other form factors, such as Google Glass, are being tested out by vendors too.

But if they do take off, businesses that ignore the potential of wearable computing devices will kick themselves for missing a big opportunity said Richard Holway, chairman of analyst firm TechMarketView, who warned enterprises not to dismiss wearable devices in the same way that they may have dismissed tablets previously.

"Wearable computing will infect every part of corporate IT from financial services (think mobile payments) to airlines (think e-tickets) through to healthcare (in my view its biggest market). You can ignore it. But, much more importantly, you could start to take real advantage of it. You probably have a year to get your plans into production," he said.

If I had to guess about the technical challenge holding up the iWatch: battery. It has no room for anything other than a microscopic battery. Smart phones conserve battery life by mostly being in sleep mode, with the power-eating screen turned off. Anything calling itself a "watch" will have to have a screen on at all (or most) times. There's probably just no way to keep this thing running short of charging it every several hours.

Even assuming they got the thing to work, I have a mixed take on this.


First take: There is no way I will ever wear that stupid-looking thing. It's the timekeeping equivalent of a Razor scooter. It's not an age-appropriate accoutrement for anyone older than 14, or 25 if you're liberal. They should just go ahead and sell the iWatch with a complimentary pair of Zany Zappers.

Second take: I've complained about smart phones before. I think they're too big and too obtrusive.

After smart phones got big (literally big, too), the next innovation was the tablet, which was... a very large smart-phone type device.

It seems to me you don't really need both, do you? If you have a big tablet for consuming media, why do you need a large smartphone too? Does anyone really need a small computer (smart phone), a medium sized computer (tablet), and a full sized computer (a computer)?

I could see that this is where the "smart watch" winds up gaining market: It could be that people like the idea of a small, unobtrusive phone/browser/data manager/storage device they can wear on the wrist, and they might use that in combination with a tablet. The watch would provide the cell reception for the tablet via a Bluetooth link (or just a direct wired connection).

In a market with three similar devices:

1. one of which is very small an obtrusive and can be worn like a watch,

2. one of which is too big for a pocket and yet too small to watch movies on, and

3. a third which is too big to be casually portable but is a better size for watching movies on,

I could see the combination of 1 + 3 replacing 2, which, at its size and capability, does a great number of things but loses in one important way: You now have to carry around an electronic device with you at all times, which no one did up until six years ago.

The watch + tablet combination would work, maybe. When you want pure portability and unobtrusiveness and a phone and a tiny computer link, you just wear the watch and skip the tablet; when you have time to kill and want to watch a movie or read a book, you bring the tablet too.

I just think the smart phone, as it is, is an awkward and unsatisfying middle position. It's too big for a phone and too small for a computer.

I know I'm alone on this. I know that I am isolated in my skepticism-verging-on-antipathy towards the smart phone. I know that most of you still think that smart phones are a pretty neat idea (much like the pre-destruction Earthlings in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy still thought digital watches were a pretty neat idea).

But a man with the truth is a majority of one. And my anti-smart-phone position will prevail.

Then again, based on the mock-ups, there is no way this iWatch is looking anything less than completely stupid. So, back to my First Take.


digg this
posted by Ace at 07:54 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
dantesed: "727 The DC bike cops are funneling the line. I won ..."

Widespread Pepe: "Q was a 4chan op that Jared and his friends took o ..."

Whitmer-Weight Boxing Champion Jaydon Hayden: "He's not retarded, lunatic, stupid, insane, etc. ..."

Grump928(C) : "[i]Last night some dimwit on MSLSD said the US Arm ..."

Bert G: "Correction, they're descending, but still too high ..."

Moron Robbie - the left is burning black areas but only looting white ones: "Not sure how high he went. - I'm guessing "a ..."

Sjg: "The DC bike cops are funneling the line. I wonder ..."

NaCly Dog[/i][/b][/s]: "Gref What an idiot. We've used US cities for M ..."

Moron Robbie - the left is burning black areas but only looting white ones: "GOP has to find another city for the convention. ..."

AlaBAMA: "714 I stopped listening for a bit are you joking a ..."

Jordan61: "685 Quick OT: watched Reign of Fire - dragons come ..."

t-bird: "[i]I'm sort of surprised the left decided to press ..."

Recent Entries
Search


Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64