« Schumer-Toomey Gun Control Gets Cloture with 68 Votes | Main | A Question For @SenToomey »
April 11, 2013

Amazing: Immigration Bill States That If Border-Security Goals Aren't Met In Five Years, They'll Convene a Bipartisan Commission to Deal With the Problem Then

All along people willing to entertain the prospect of a compromise have insisted on one, and only one, thing: No more. We'll consider a compromise provided that border security is improved. We'll consider an amnesty, so long as this is the last amnesty we ever have to entertain.

But the left will simply not agree to this, under any circumstances.

The current bill establishes goals for border security. What happens if those goals aren't met? Which, by the way, they won't be?

Well then we'll have a "bipartisan commission" to advise DHS on how to straighten it all out.

Allah asks:

If there’s one thing you can count on in Washington, it’s a bipartisan commission succeeding where all else has failed. Question one: If the Gang thinks DHS is so likely to fail at enforcement (which, in fairness, it is) that they’re already providing money for an emergency commission to help rescue it after five years, why not just establish the commission now? Or better yet, why not hold a bunch of hearings right now to pick the brains of “officials from border states and other experts” so that DHS has the expertise it needs before a bill is passed? You know why: The longer the process drags out, the more skittish key constituencies will get about the bill and the greater the risk will be that it’ll fail. (That’s why Pat Leahy and Democrats don’t want more than a single token hearing after the recess in early May.) Installing a commission after five more years of security failures sounds to me like something designed to take political heat off of DHS rather than something that’ll help significantly with border improvements. Without the commission, the public would grow restless after five years and demand explanations from Homeland Security on why they can’t tighten the border even with a bipartisan congressional mandate. The Gang’s anticipating that and, to head off the restlessness, providing a preemptive “solution.” No need to panic if DHS is dragging its feet. There’ll be a commission by 2018 to “help” them out, i.e. buy them another five years of public patience to see if they can make any headway at the border.

There is no compromise at all here -- the left gets what it wants, and agrees to entertain our concerns five years hence. Why would they be more amenable to border security in five years, when they've gotten all they wanted out of us, than they are now, when they haven't yet?

If they were going to agree to these things then, why can't they agree to them now?

Simple answer: They have no intention of agreeing to them five years from now. This is a con.

The Democrats are conning the Republicans, but that's business-as-usual and I can't even call it that objectionable. They're supposed to con Republicans into laws.

But what of the Republican office-holders conning their constituents that genuine border security is provided for in this bill? That is objectionable.

This sort of mechanism -- putting off discussion into the future while proposing some kind of "bipartisan commission" to resolve issues -- may be a useful ploy to paper over minor complaints that are holding up a deal in which all major disagreements have been resolved, but not for putting off discussion of the major disagreements themselves.

But this is an issue we require firm answers on, now. We should not leave it to five years hence to decide if we're going to enforce the border or not. (We won't, by the way.)

The left -- and the political elite generally -- are fond of saying "we have to be willing to discuss issues."

Well, let's discuss the issue of border security, then. And discuss it now, not five years from now in a toothless bipartisan commission empowered to do nothing more than advise.


digg this
posted by Ace at 12:19 PM

| Access Comments




Recent Comments
Eli Cash: "Wait until Ginsberg croaks. Then we will see some ..."

Hrothgar [/i][/u][/b][/s]: "[i]Why doesn't what [b]other[/b] people want matte ..."

Jane D'oh: "[i]BTW... that info on ZeroHedge came from the Sou ..."

JackStraw: "Well would you look at that. Imran Awan and his wi ..."

Kay: "have to admit, I know people from movies or tv, an ..."

JPS: "When the WaPo writer urges political violence, I t ..."

ScoggDog: "[i]Send us some dispatches from the front lines yo ..."

kallisto: "if we had a free press that reported the truth the ..."

Hairyback Guy: "sure as hell need people like me, that's had enoug ..."

Hrothgar [/i][/u][/b][/s]: "[i]Incitement to riot is a crime. Its not just ..."

The Gipper Lives: "btw, in addition to being an Obamanoid and Occupy- ..."

Banana Splits Guy: ">>>Is that the deal ? I needed some commas? I t ..."

Recent Entries
Search


MuNuvians
Polls! Polls! Polls!
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)
News/Chat
Archives
Powered by
Movable Type 2.64