« Barack Obama: Hey, Wanna Get High? |
Main
|
Boston Globe Takes a Tomahawk To Elizabeth Warren's Fauxcahontas Claims »
May 25, 2012
Leading Political Indicator: Debbie Wasserman Schultz Says Wisconsin Isn't Such A Big Deal; No Major Repercussions if Democrats Lose
No biggie.
“I think, honestly, there aren’t going to be any repercussions,” Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) said in a broad-ranging interview on C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers.”
“It’s an election that’s based in Wisconsin. It’s an election that I think is important nationally because Scott Walker is an example of how extreme the tea party has been when it comes to the policies that they have pushed the Republicans to adopt,” Wasserman Schultz said. “But I think it’ll be, at the end of the day, a Wisconsin-based election, and like I said, across the rest of the country and including in Wisconsin, President Obama is ahead.”
Not Such A Big Deal, and It's a Local Thing Anyway
Which is exactly what you say if you think it's going to be close and you need to energize voters by putting a bee in their bonnets.
Not.
Thanks to @drewmtips, making with the silly.
Update: New poll: Walker by... 12.
But as Woverhamshire Wolf (Winston Wolf's clam-digger great uncle) once observed, "Gentlemen, lets not start shucking each other's conchs just yet."